Skip to comments.
ABC: Harry Reid will vote against Roberts
(none) ^
| 9/20/2005
| ABC news - radio
Posted on 09/20/2005 11:05:25 AM PDT by TChris
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-250 next last
To: .cnI redruM
Harry Reid must think he's important, or something. Harry Reid thinks?
21
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:00 AM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: TChris
So is this his clever way of revealing that Roberts will not be filibustered?
22
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:07 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: kellynla
Committee vote is Thursday I believe.
23
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:11 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(FOOTBALL REFEREES: Best seat in the house, and we're paid to be there.)
To: silverleaf
Yes. President Bush, in the spirit of bipartisanship, should choose someone all the Dems can get behind.
24
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:17 AM PDT
by
babaloo
To: TChris
25
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:19 AM PDT
by
jw777
To: TChris
26
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:21 AM PDT
by
Wombat101
(Islam: Turning everything it touches to Sh*t since 632 AD...)
To: TChris
I'd love to hear his reasons. Perhaps he can claim Roberts is too smart? Or maybe Roberts knows what the Constitution says (and we cannot have a Justice who possesses such dangerous knowledge.)
To: theDentist
28
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:29 AM PDT
by
sofaman
("Get off the phone, you big dope!" Mark Levin.)
To: TChris
I am not sure what I am going to do now. I am sure that the President really counted on Nancy Reid voting for Judge Roberts </sar>
29
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:34 AM PDT
by
Sthitch
To: TChris
What a pathetic old coot! I'm surprised Upchuck Schumer didn't beat him to the microphone!
30
posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:45 AM PDT
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: TChris
If there are a significant amount of Democrat "No's". Then appointing a Janice Rogers Brown will be that much easier. It will look like the Dems are crying wolf for anyone Bush appoints
To: TChris
I think this is the first of many. The Democrats will oppose any nominee. I predicted 59-40-1 on the Senate floor with a straight party line vote out of committee. You know who will not be able to find the Senate floor.
Hope I'm proven wrong. Bush's poll numbers have given the Democrats new life and they consider him vulnerable on ALL fronts, even Supreme Court nominees.
32
posted on
09/20/2005 11:10:24 AM PDT
by
Chuck54
(Confirm justice Roberts!)
To: Lunkhead_01
33
posted on
09/20/2005 11:10:39 AM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: .cnI redruM
Harry Reid must think he's important, or something. LMAO! No kidding. Amazing what pissant Senators will do to get attention.
34
posted on
09/20/2005 11:10:43 AM PDT
by
demkicker
((Life has many choices. Eternity has only two. Which one have you chosen?))
To: TChris
I'm glad they cleared that up...I was losing sleep over it.
35
posted on
09/20/2005 11:10:54 AM PDT
by
Dog
(Fed up with weak in the knee Freepers.....who whine the sky is falling when it's NOT!!!)
To: TChris
Ask me if I care...I don't......Reid is inconsequential and an obstructionist like 90% of the rest of his party.
To: dts32041
Would some one send him back to New Zealand.
37
posted on
09/20/2005 11:11:25 AM PDT
by
dts32041
( Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
To: b4its2late
Actually, I am surprised. I didn't think even he could be that stupid. Now Bush shouldn't feel bound to nominate a "moderate". If they can't vote for Roberts they won't vote for anyone he nominates, so why try to placate them. Come on Janice Rogers Brown.
To: TChris
To: Chuck54
The L.A. Times doesn't share your pessimism. :-) I wonder if the editors will now run a story blasting Harry Reid for petty partisanship? :-)
40
posted on
09/20/2005 11:11:46 AM PDT
by
Coop
(FR= a lotta talk, but little action)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-250 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
