Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid Warns of Filibuster Over Owen
Political Wire ^ | September 17, 2005

Posted on 09/18/2005 12:56:52 AM PDT by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: RWR8189

NOMINATE MAURA CORRIGAN!!!


41 posted on 09/18/2005 9:16:19 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; California Patriot

Maura Corrigan of the Michigan Supreme Court would be the ideal candidate.


42 posted on 09/18/2005 9:18:33 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

But, save from being limited to a wheelchair, Abbott is a fully-functioning person. He has travelled statewide campaigning for public office. He does not have brain damage or any other infirmity. He has already been on a state Supreme Court and being on SCOTUS is not a physically taxing job. Heck, we have had octogenarians on the bench in all sorts of levels of health. If the Court hasn't been modified for wheelchair access then they are in violation of their own federal law (ADA).

You are right that the Dems are champions of the double-standard but I would think they wouldn't want to touch his disability as an issue. Unlike FDR and JFK where the press hid serious health issues, they can't hide this - not without the elephant in the room becoming obvious. The media would not ignore it - especially if Bush trots him out for the big introduction the way he did for John Roberts. So if the Dems go into their typical baseless hysteria, it will be seen to many as if they are attacking a man in a wheelchair.

Some of the Dem-friendly media may try to keep that appearance away using tricky camera angles but it will be difficult to hide, especially if Bush introduces him as the first handicapped American nominated for the Supreme Court.


43 posted on 09/18/2005 9:35:23 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (RIP New Orleans 1718-2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

True


44 posted on 09/18/2005 10:11:54 AM PDT by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

I have an Aunt Shirley, and you're no Shirley.

Nobody should be a Shirley. She's pretty mean.

Nevertheless, I am certain Bush should be scared by Harry.

And yet somehow, strangely, he just continues to lead.

Like a bulldozer over New Orleanian garbage.


45 posted on 09/18/2005 10:15:41 AM PDT by GretchenM (Hooked on porn and hating it? Visit http://www.theophostic.com .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

No, because we can't let the Rats take over a state supreme court.


46 posted on 09/18/2005 12:40:12 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy

You're right that the President should nominate a Constitutionalist conservative. But he needs to nominate a Constitutionalist conservative who has no paper trail on controversial issues.


47 posted on 09/18/2005 5:47:57 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Harry Reid can take his Searchlight and shove it up his a$$.


48 posted on 09/18/2005 11:59:23 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Do the Dems want Bush to nominate another woman for SCOTUS or not? It shouldn't matter what her beliefs are, she's a woman, surely NOW should be supportive....


49 posted on 09/19/2005 12:02:29 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

So make them filibuster her already. These are the pro-Hillary folks who, three years hence, will be sneering that the Republicans are "afraid of strong women." Let them explain that one away.


50 posted on 09/19/2005 12:07:31 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson