Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Tom Campbell campaigns for Prop. 76 (threatening tax increases)
Contra Costa Times, CA ^ | Sep. 15, 2005 | Elise Ackerman

Posted on 09/15/2005 8:21:41 AM PDT by calcowgirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: calcowgirl; newzjunkey
"BTW, given your past posting history, I find you trying to use Tom McClintock as a selling point is pretty disingenuous. You trashed him at every opportunity."

Oh my. It seems we have the ugly specter of hypocrisy raising it's head.

How about it, newzjunkey?

21 posted on 09/16/2005 12:45:44 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Well, Tom is running for Lt. Governor and will hopefully get some support from the CAGOP this time around. I suppose he is trying to look at the bright side and bite his tongue a bit on the negatives.

To fund last years budget, in addition to the huge Prop 57/58 borrowing, Arnold borrowed a bunch of money from education, transportation, and local governments. Ordinarily, these dollars would have to be paid back over the next couple of years. What this Prop does is to authorize bonds for repayment to the respective funds and then provides for the bonds to be paid back over the next 15 years. As such, more near-term budget revenue is freed up to spend on other things (avoiding cuts and/or tax increases).

I don't think Arnold has any intent of making deep cuts. He is just looking for an excuse to raise taxes. If Prop 76 doesn't pass, he can use that as an excuse.


22 posted on 09/16/2005 12:57:00 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
"What this Prop does is to authorize bonds for repayment to the respective funds and then provides for the bonds to be paid back over the next 15 years. As such, more near-term budget revenue is freed up to spend on other things (avoiding cuts and/or tax increases)."

I keep looking for a reason to say YES on Prop. 76 and you continue to give me reasons for voting NO.

So far it's a NO.

23 posted on 09/16/2005 1:13:27 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Czar
Funny how the stories change over time. I suppose "save" really meant "defer":

CA: Schwarzenegger takes reform agenda on the road to San Diego ,
Associated Press, April 11, 2005

"We're going to save, I guarantee you, $5 billion for the state because of this election we're going to hold," the governor said, later asking for SAIC employees to sign his initiative petitions. He did not explain how the money would be saved.

24 posted on 09/16/2005 1:21:50 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
"Funny how the stories change over time. I suppose "save" really meant 'defer'"

No doubt...

25 posted on 09/16/2005 3:16:41 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson