Skip to comments.
Russia to build the world's first floating nuclear power plant(mini-nuke station for arctic area)
Novosti ^
| 09/08/05
| Tatiana Sinitsyna
Posted on 09/13/2005 4:47:52 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; neverdem; spetznaz
To: TigerLikesRooster; All
OH MAN I think some Alaska residents wouldn't want this especially Enviormentlist wacko
3
posted on
09/13/2005 4:49:25 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
("Not everybody in, it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"= Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: SevenofNine
Re #3
If Russians cut the station loose from their shore, it could drift to Alaska. Could it become an useful blackmail tool for impoverished Russians living in Arctic region? "Give us 10 million dollars this year, or you will have our mini nuke station!":)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Then it would start up its reactors and - let there be light!"
So, are we talking about really long cables over water, microwave transmission, what? I must've missed something in the article.
5
posted on
09/13/2005 4:52:50 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This has disaster written all over it. I hope the 200k price tag was a typo.
6
posted on
09/13/2005 4:53:10 PM PDT
by
satchmodog9
(Murder and weather are our only news)
To: TigerLikesRooster; Kathy in Alaska; All
OH MAN I going get one of Alaska freepers on this LOL!
Hey Tiger actually I have better idea have one of Alaska resident hold this nuke plant hostage
Kathy are you game????
7
posted on
09/13/2005 4:54:53 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
("Not everybody in, it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"= Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: satchmodog9
I hope the 200k price tag was a typo.
Yeah, there's no way. The underground mini version that some Alaskan communities have expressed interest in ran into the millions, obviously.
8
posted on
09/13/2005 4:55:36 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This is sure to make the envirowackos nuts!
They want to stop the drilling in Alaska but, just a few hundred miles away a nuke plant producing more juice than the oil!
9
posted on
09/13/2005 4:56:56 PM PDT
by
WakeUpAndVote
(Member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1992!)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: fr695
Katrina nothing. Titanic.
11
posted on
09/13/2005 4:58:56 PM PDT
by
satchmodog9
(Murder and weather are our only news)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Can anyone say "Nuclear Meltdown" without the containment?
Oh...I forgot.
Tbey tried that one already!
12
posted on
09/13/2005 4:59:25 PM PDT
by
montomike
(Gay means happy and carefree...not an abomination against nature's check valve.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Given Russia's record with their nuke sub fleet rotting and sinking in port with the nuke power plants still aoard this does not bode well.
13
posted on
09/13/2005 5:00:38 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(Mega super duper moose, whine, cheese, series, zot, viking kitties, barf alert!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The Greens will love this.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Almost like Chernobyl on wheels!
15
posted on
09/13/2005 5:03:27 PM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(Saddam's family were WMD's - He's behind bars & his sons are DEAD!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
16
posted on
09/13/2005 5:04:29 PM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Your papers please.)
To: RasterMaster
Re #15
As I said earlier, it could be more useful as an extortion scheme.
To: TigerLikesRooster
You should have seen the screw up in Thule Greenland. We built a nuke power plant on the glacier. When it was started.The ice started to melt. They put refrigeration cooling tubes under the plant. It not only melted more ice. But started to melt the threm-o-frost. It was shut down then moved to a naval ship anchored in the harbor. Then electricity for the base was now supplied from the ship. This was back in the 60s.
18
posted on
09/13/2005 5:08:48 PM PDT
by
Don_Ret_USAF
(Don_Ret_USAF"If you are losing talk out of your @$$. If you are winning sit down and SHUT UP.")
To: toddlintown
Re #16
Gamble your money away sitting next to a potentially leaky nuke reactor? Sounds too risky even for high risk takers.:)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Um guys, everybody has been running nuclear powered naval vessels for 50 years. Big deal.
20
posted on
09/13/2005 5:10:48 PM PDT
by
JasonC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson