Skip to comments.
Watchmen stand vigil in city’s wealthiest homes
MSNBC/Wash Post ^
| Ariana Eunjung Cha
Posted on 09/10/2005 7:54:06 AM PDT by mtrott
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: mtrott
"Ariana Eunjung Cha"
WTF?
21
posted on
09/10/2005 9:56:53 AM PDT
by
verity
(Don't let your children grow up to be mainstream media maggots.)
To: cajungirl
When I was poor and putting myself through college, I had an emergency $100 (5-$20 bills) stashed. I put it away and forced myself to forget that it was there even when I was hungry.
To: TaxRelief
yep, that is what most of us do.
23
posted on
09/10/2005 10:05:59 AM PDT
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: stopem
This rich/poor garbage is getting ridiculous, like it's a crime to have money and not be poor. And if you aren't mooching off everyone and the govt that's a bad, bad thing. It is attitude that separates the doers from the takers. The doers are not resentful of the rich. They want to be like them and when they are they want it to mean something.
The takers never intend to be rich, they don't have they drive or energy, so they resent them.
And there you have it.
24
posted on
09/10/2005 10:59:03 AM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
To: mtrott
Guzman was on the sidewalk talking to a SWAT team from Texas when his father [82] walked out with his gun in a holster around his waist. Someone yelled: "Gun! We see a gun!" The entire team -- eight young men -- immediately cocked and aimed their weapons at Ernesto Guzman, who is a bony 5-foot-2.
So when the cops shoot him do you think we'll read about it, and if we do how will the story read?
25
posted on
09/10/2005 11:50:54 AM PDT
by
StACase
To: Ursus arctos horribilis
That guy was a lawyer? I figured he was asking for trouble with what he was saying. The police aren't going to forget about him, that's for sure.
26
posted on
09/10/2005 11:53:26 AM PDT
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: EDINVA
They may or may not be rich b/c they worked their arses off... but they have a right to have what they have without being persecuted for that. At least the NO rich isn't whining that gov't isn't doing enough for them. God bless them for paying for their own armed guards.
To: Lx
Hey, lawyers can be self sufficient people too.
28
posted on
09/10/2005 1:37:33 PM PDT
by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
To: MsWrite_CA
God bless them for paying for their own armed guards. Nobody, except maybe the touchy feely stripe of gun grabbers gives a rat's patootie if they pay for armed guards, in lieu of being armed themselves. What we object to is folks not being able to function as their own armed guards, without a license from the state (or even with a license to carry concealed). That's the problem. The violation of both the Second Amendment and it's counterpart in the Louisiana constitution, is what we object to.
29
posted on
09/11/2005 1:02:06 PM PDT
by
El Gato
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson