Skip to comments.
NYT: Where's the Governator Now? (Froth alert!)
New York Times ^
| September 9, 2005
| Editorial
Posted on 09/09/2005 6:00:22 AM PDT by OESY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
09/09/2005 6:00:23 AM PDT
by
OESY
To: OESY
In Sacramento vetoing gay marriage laws. Next question, where's Gray Davis now? (subtext: Who's your Daddy?)
2
posted on
09/09/2005 6:02:07 AM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
("No wonder [Bob Denver's] dead. Bush left him on that island." -NRO)
To: OESY
Yes in 5 years the people have flipped and now don't mind 2 guys getting married....
3
posted on
09/09/2005 6:03:25 AM PDT
by
petercooper
(Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice.)
To: OESY
If a ballot initiative is 'stale' after 5 years then I guess there should be no problem revisiting Roe v Wade, right?
If they think the people want SSM, let them have another ballot initiative and prove it.
4
posted on
09/09/2005 6:05:42 AM PDT
by
Grig
To: OESY
NYT: "We're for whatever option gets us what we want."
5
posted on
09/09/2005 6:07:45 AM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: OESY
Why isn't the Times asking where is Gov Blanco now? They are focusing on the wrong governor.
6
posted on
09/09/2005 6:09:27 AM PDT
by
sydbas
To: Grig
ROE was NEVER an initiative that the majority of Americans ever wanted - in fact prpbably over 75% of oral Americans felt then and still feel that abortion = MURDER.
7
posted on
09/09/2005 6:13:15 AM PDT
by
hombre_sincero
(www.sigmaitsys.com)
To: OESY
Leave it to the NYT to think that saying yes takes courage.
8
posted on
09/09/2005 6:13:56 AM PDT
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: hombre_sincero
Damneable fumble-fingers!
"...75% of oral Americans..." = "...75% of MORAL Americans..."
Do you know what's bad? - having the need to placate the whinny crybaby spelling police on this board and having to post "Mea Cuplpas"
9
posted on
09/09/2005 6:15:19 AM PDT
by
hombre_sincero
(www.sigmaitsys.com)
To: hombre_sincero
Hombre,
Personally, I was wondering if that was some kind of Freudian slip ;-)
Seriously, with the 'moral' qualification included, your percentage that believe abortion is murder may well be low.
FReegards!
Reb
10
posted on
09/09/2005 6:27:52 AM PDT
by
RebelBanker
(To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!)
To: numberonepal
No kidding! I think vetoing the Gay Marriage Bill in CA takes incredible courage. To stand for the people?? To take a stand against the Gay Agenda, the Gay Lobby, the screaming 'I wanna's' and say, "This is not right." THAT is true courage. Go Arnold!!
11
posted on
09/09/2005 6:31:14 AM PDT
by
bboop
(Facts are your friend.)
To: Grig
If a ballot initiative is 'stale' after 5 years then I guess there should be no problem revisiting Roe v Wade, right?
Yeah, it looks the NYT has once again stepped in it. Leaky Leahy, Chucky and Fat Teddy will not be pleased.
12
posted on
09/09/2005 6:36:34 AM PDT
by
Commander Salamander
(Some attain greatness going through what you're going through)
To: RebelBanker
oral vs moral ?
No Comment.
;>)
To: OESY
Arnie did just what I voted for him to do.
14
posted on
09/09/2005 6:48:19 AM PDT
by
BIGZ
To: OESY
"That ignores the fact that five years is an eternity in the fast-moving arena of gay rights."
Ummm, OK.
"Even though 61 percent of the voters approved the ballot measure, recent polls show that the electorate is now evenly split, with Democrats and independents favoring same-sex marriage and Republicans strongly opposed."
Well then, why even bother with elections. Why not just conduct a poll? Preferably an NYT-sponsored poll?
To: hombre_sincero
"whinny crybaby spelling police"
Is that the spelling police that cries while sounding like a horse?
To: OESY
This country has thing bass ackwards. in a Republic, it is Majority rule, not protection of the minority.
17
posted on
09/09/2005 6:57:29 AM PDT
by
television is just wrong
(http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
To: OESY
Scharzenegger is ALL we have RIGHT NOW.
18
posted on
09/09/2005 6:58:24 AM PDT
by
television is just wrong
(http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
To: OESY
The 'Governator' is supporting the statewide referendum where the people of California voted overwhelmingly against legalizing gay marriage. There also is the problem of the legislature passing a such bill because such an action arguably violates the state constitution. Schwarzenegger is doing the right thing. The NY Slimes is just showing its true rainbow colors.
19
posted on
09/09/2005 7:02:36 AM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(Mathew 7:1 through 6)
To: OESY
Oh, and for some of our fellow FReepers:
Some RINO, huh? I'll bet there was a ton of pressure on Arnold to let this sail through. And he didn't. Didn't even waffle or equivocate.
20
posted on
09/09/2005 7:05:31 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(Join the AmishDude fan club: "Great point." -- AliVertias; ":-) Very clever" -- MJY1288)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson