Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kristol: Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory? (Will Bush nominate a conservative?)
The Weekly Standard ^ | September 6, 2005 | William Kristol

Posted on 09/06/2005 4:14:43 PM PDT by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: California Patriot
Is [Bush] willing to fill the O'Connor seat with a conservative, and can he then make an effective case for that nominee to the Senate and the country?

Was Kristol overseas when Roberts was first nominated?

If Bush was prepared to nominate a conservative for the O'Connor seat then, there is no reason to believe he won't nominate a conservative now.

What a stupid question...

21 posted on 09/06/2005 4:30:00 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
I'm not personally a big fan of Bill Kristol, but he is a good political analyst.

He is good at what he does. And to err is human.

22 posted on 09/06/2005 4:31:04 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Kristol wouldn't know a real conservative if he/she kicked him in the ass. He was McLame's buddy as I recall. And his record of being wrong on things is immense. I trust Dubya a lot more than Kristol and other Weekly Standard lites.


23 posted on 09/06/2005 4:34:32 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Billy Crystal is a more on the money political pundit than William Kristol. Bush seized the opportunity to grab the CJ and did it. Kristol is playing checkers Bush is playing chess.


24 posted on 09/06/2005 4:37:32 PM PDT by hflynn ( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

"Kristol wouldn't know a real conservative if he/she kicked him in the ass."

He certainly isn't daddy's boy. Bill is out to make headlines and he doesn't care about ideology if he gets his name in the papers and his face on TV.

Just IMO, of course!


25 posted on 09/06/2005 4:38:32 PM PDT by Prost1 (New AG, Berger is still free, copped a plea! I still get my news from FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
Oh yeah, well....

If it isn't Edith Jones I'm taking my vote and going home!

26 posted on 09/06/2005 4:39:56 PM PDT by skimbell (Now in its 42nd year and still no Exit Strategy for the War on Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Not sure where all the hostility to Kristol is coming from...!! Anyway, what I am wondering about is whether Bush can nominate and get confirmed an O'Connor replacement (hopefully a conservative) in time for that person to participate in the partial-birth abortion and parental notification cases now on the Court's docket. Dems will be motivated to keep O'Connor on the Court as long as possible!!!! I think they will hold their fire and concentrate on the O'Connor replacement, particularly if that person is a true conservative.


27 posted on 09/06/2005 4:42:20 PM PDT by jkoenig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
" If it isn't Edith Jones I'm taking my vote and going home!"

Janice Rogers Brown wouldn't be good enough for you?

28 posted on 09/06/2005 4:45:20 PM PDT by el_texicano (Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

"the president deprived himself and his supporters of the easiest argument for his next nominee: that surely a reelected conservative president is entitled to replace a conservative justice--Rehnquist--with another conservative."

There is no argument that will assuage the clamor of the left in selecting Supreme Court justices. What would be a huge mistake would be for Bush to acknowledge that a nominee has ANY political leaning, left or right, and that it is relevant to the nominee's confirmation. That reduces the process to a quid pro quo compromise that the Democrats would never observe with a Democratic president.


29 posted on 09/06/2005 4:45:38 PM PDT by Spok (Est omnis de civilitate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Amen


30 posted on 09/06/2005 4:49:56 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Kristol is not in the President's inner circle.

No one that is speaking is in the President's inner circle.

Everyone was wrong about who he would pick last time.

Ergo, all people spreading these doomsday scenarios are nothing more than rumor mongers.

Kristol WAS the person to report on O'Connor's resignation, but O'Connor is a 'moderate". It is not a stretch to imagine kristol is well connected to the 'moderates' in D.C. If he reports on kennedy or Stevens leaving, I'd pay him attention. Otherwise, no.


31 posted on 09/06/2005 4:53:11 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Barbour/Honore in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jkoenig

Bush can nominate someone to be on the Court in time. The question is Congress and rule of thumb is to expect disappointment from them.

Kristol is the mouthpiece of McCain. This is where hostility arises.


32 posted on 09/06/2005 4:54:38 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Barbour/Honore in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
I think you hit it. Kristol owes his--very good--living to being a Beltway-buzz boy. Sitting in the green room is how he makes his green. Of course he has a huge ego and like all talking heads wants his views accepted by the Washington pols. Personally, I can barely stomach him.
33 posted on 09/06/2005 4:55:12 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

Isn't Ted 68?
Advantage to placing the youngerst possible man on the bench to consider.
What about James Rogan, previously rep from California?
Awesome conservative.


34 posted on 09/06/2005 4:58:37 PM PDT by oreolady (arrest blanko and druggie mayor nagin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano
Oh she'd be fine, but she's a bit to the right of Jones I think.

I would enjoy the confirmation of Brown though. The damn dims just about hyperventilate at the mention of Browns name, that would be fun.

Yeah, OK,

" If it isn't Edith Jones, or Janice Rogers Brown, I'm taking my vote and going home!"

35 posted on 09/06/2005 4:59:44 PM PDT by skimbell (Now in its 42nd year and still no Exit Strategy for the War on Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
Oops, of course that should be "to the left of Jones".
36 posted on 09/06/2005 5:01:06 PM PDT by skimbell (Now in its 42nd year and still no Exit Strategy for the War on Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

I was thinking about Olsen as well. Truly. I think he deserves consideration for sure.


37 posted on 09/06/2005 5:20:36 PM PDT by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for our country than anyone can ever imagine. He is solid as a rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

In governing Bush has show all the political skill of a wet noodle.


38 posted on 09/06/2005 5:21:42 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Cindy Sheehan: "All You Are Saying Is Give APPEASEMENT A Chance!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You *assume* Roberts is a conservative. That's up for debate.
39 posted on 09/06/2005 5:26:35 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Cindy Sheehan: "All You Are Saying Is Give APPEASEMENT A Chance!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

Yeah, GW tried so hard to reach out to the other side, but then 911 - boom - he showed his oats. For years now, the Libs have been tring to tear him down - can you imagine what it must be like? - vilified every day by all major newspapers, TV networks, Hollywood, etc, ect. The temptation to appease must be overwhelming. I sure hope he understands, that we, the red states will take care of his legacy, if he will remain the conservative CEO for just two more years. He might outshine Reagan by 7 years to 5.


40 posted on 09/06/2005 5:27:13 PM PDT by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson