Skip to comments.
Kill Saddam! U.S. journalists agree: If you can't beat him, assassinate him. (1997 of course)
Mother Jones.com ^
| 25 November 1997
| Eric Umansky
Posted on 08/29/2005 6:21:35 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Freepers might want to copy this and send it to the editors of local and nation fishwraps to remind them what they wanted to do to Saddam in 1997.
To: Grampa Dave
Why was it OK to get rid of terrorists the easy way under Clintoon and forbidden under Bush?
2
posted on
08/29/2005 6:23:14 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(“You love life, while we love death.” - Al-Qaeda / Democratic Party)
To: Grampa Dave
Thomas Friedman, foreign affairs columnist, New York Times, Nov. 6: "Saddam Hussein is the reason God created cruise missiles. ...So if and when Saddam pushes beyond the brink, and we get that one good shot, let's make sure it's a head shot."FRIEDMAN: "I was taken out of context by the neo-cons...What I meant to say was that this is only valid when a Democrat is in the Oval Office."
3
posted on
08/29/2005 6:25:27 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: Dallas59
Anything the Killer Klintoons did was wonderful in the eyes of the left wing lunatics who controlled the MSM.
Anything that GW wants to do to protect Americans in the WOT is terrible in the eyes of thee lunatic lefty mediots in control of the MSM today.
4
posted on
08/29/2005 6:26:01 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
To: Dallas59
Why was it OK to get rid of terrorists the easy way under Clintoon and forbidden under Bush?Because Klinton is GOD to the left and could never do any wrong.
5
posted on
08/29/2005 6:26:35 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: frogjerk
Wow, you are good. You could be an editor for the NY Slimes:
"FRIEDMAN: "I was taken out of context by the neo-cons...What I meant to say was that this is only valid when a Democrat is in the Oval Office."
6
posted on
08/29/2005 6:27:30 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
To: backhoe; Peach; kcvl; Cindy; Ernest_at_the_Beach
7
posted on
08/29/2005 6:29:00 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
To: frogjerk
"Because Klinton is GOD to the left and could never do any wrong."
Amazing isn't it?
8
posted on
08/29/2005 6:30:05 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
To: Dallas59
Just like when Clinton ordered the execution of that retarded inmate when he ran for election and the media didn't say nothing but Bush caught hell over his executions (never mind that Ma Richards oversaw more executions than he did)
To: mhking; nutmeg; King Prout; MeekOneGOP
10
posted on
08/29/2005 6:32:08 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
To: Grampa Dave
Were there attempts from 1992-2000 to kill Saddam, and, if so , what evidence is there?
11
posted on
08/29/2005 6:32:13 AM PDT
by
uscabjd
( a)
To: Grampa Dave
> Executive Order 12333 ...
> Neither Bush nor Clinton has rescinded it.
But the EO notwithstanding, the first bombs of Operation
Iraqi Freedom were aimed at Saddam personally (based on
faulty intel, as it turned out).
To: Grampa Dave
I wrote a letter to the editor the other day about this. And also JFK's administration trying to kill Castro.
13
posted on
08/29/2005 6:33:33 AM PDT
by
Peach
(South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
To: frogjerk
FRIEDMAN: "I was taken out of context by the neo-cons...What I meant to say was that this is only valid when a Democrat is in the Oval Office."MoonbatLand: Somehow, Karl Rove is behind this.... < /Leftist paranoia>
To: Grampa Dave
Excellent! Thanks for posting this.
15
posted on
08/29/2005 6:34:44 AM PDT
by
Finny
(God continue to Bless President G.W. Bush with wisdom, popularity, safety and success.)
To: Grampa Dave
16
posted on
08/29/2005 6:35:49 AM PDT
by
TBP
To: Grampa Dave
Excellent post! Bump for great justice! MSM, make your time!
17
posted on
08/29/2005 6:40:16 AM PDT
by
GBA
To: Grampa Dave
I don't think that is true. Clinton got just as much, if not more flack from the press for all the stuff done in his presidency. It just seems like less, because it was from FR, instead of against FR.
18
posted on
08/29/2005 6:40:43 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: Grampa Dave
To: stuartcr
I don't think that is true. Clinton got just as much, if not more flack from the press for all the stuff done in his presidency. It just seems like less, because it was from FR, instead of against FR.So you are saying Clinton got more flack from the press than W does?
20
posted on
08/29/2005 6:43:20 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson