Posted on 08/27/2005 3:30:22 PM PDT by Mark Felton
Let them take over, Talibanize the population and then take them out once and for all.
To get an understanding of what they believe is the justification for their actions, you need to understand the terms:
Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb
This forms the basis for Hamas, Islamic Jihad, (all created by backing from the Muslim brotherhood by the way...) of why so much of the middle-east craves and funds the destruction of Israel. Israel creates a major problem with the concept of Dar al-Islam. Its blocks its contiguous flow from North Africa and the middle-east into its main target, Europe.
Dar al-Islam [House of Islam] includes any land, which is, or WAS IN THE PAST (thats a big one because at one time, the muslim hordes where knocking on Vienna's city gates and occupied major portions of southern europe), was under Muslim political and legal control. Dar al-Islam will forever remain the domain of Islam and there is an eternal obligation incumbent upon Muslims to liberate those lands from the yoke of the non-Muslims who gained control over them and to restore the rule of Islam as it was in its days of glory.
Dar al-Harb [House of War or House of the Infidels – those who are not Muslims] includes all of the lands, which have not yet been conquered by Islam and regarding which there is an obligation to convert them to Islam as the ultimate objective is Islamic political control over the entire world.
The Islamic studies scholar, Duncan McDonald, provided a comprehensive synopsis of this, “For them, the world is divided into two parts, the one is Dar al-Islam (abode of Islam), and the other is Dar al-Harb (abode of War). In the end, Dar al-Harb must disappear into Dar al-Islam and the whole world be Muslim.”
To these two parts, one has to add a third. Until the late 1980s, France was considered Dar al-Ahd, something in the middle, between Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam, a type of place where one could stay on a temporary basis; authorization based on the fact that there one can freely practice Islam. In the late 1980s the strategy undergoes a complete change, and in a UOIF convention, it was decided that France is becoming Dar al-Islam!
From a theoretical point of view, the Islamists interpret the law this way,
...and the jihad will remain an individual obligation until all other lands which formerly were Muslim come back to us and Islam reigns within them once again. Before us lies Palestine, Bukhara, Lebanon, Chad, Erythrea, Somalia, the Philippines, Burma, South Yemen, Tashkent, Andalusia...
Following this logic, it becomes clear that France, at least up to Poitiers, conquered in the eighth century, will remain forever a part of Dar al-Islam, that every Muslim has to free from the “Unbelievers’” yoke.
The coordination of the means involved is clear for the specialists. Thus, the Stasi Commission reports, “Today the state is to give room to new religions while succeeding in their integration and fighting the political-religious instrumentalizations.”
And Yves Bertand, head of the French Renseignements Généraux (intelligence services) stated,
I noticed 15 or 20 years ago, the rise to power of the Brothers (Muslim brotherhood) through a recognized organization nowadays, the UOIF, part of a European, and maybe world-wide structure...When I say “worldwide”, it is because of the link existing with Egypt and Saudi Arabia through the European Islamic Organizations Union and the so called BOLIM (World Islamic League Bureau), the UOIF executive. We have seen the UOIF weaving a real web on all the French territory.
The analysis of some of the resources used makes it possible to understand the nature and the extent of the problem.
There are areas in France characterized as Zones de non droit – “areas without law”. In those areas, the law of the land is, for all intents and purposes, not in effect and gangs intimidate the population. The rate of growth of these areas is astounding: From 106 in 1991 to 818 in 1999 and to more than 1,100 in 2001. Muslims reside in many of these areas.
The everyday life in these Zones de Non Droit is a nightmare:
...the only criteria are power, money and fear...violence is the pivot of the Zone...Threatening maintains the Law of Secrecy... Doctors do not get in for long... Letterboxes are smashed, garbage cans are regularly burnt...fire has become the main tool for threatening youth in these zones. From January to November 1999, not less than 10,985 cases of fire have been recorded, willingly lit by “young” people... In Trappes, Marseilles or Lyons, synagogues are the object of these criminal fires. Many men rape the same woman. In the newspapers, they call her a “turning one”. This practice has become frequent in these quarters...everyday teachers and students are insulted or attacked... In my school, I have noticed a virulent anti-Semitism among students mainly originating from the Maghreb... Firemen are attacked by 100 overexcited malefactors. A fireman is often injured. A polceman says: “Here it’s the Bronx and everybody gives up...” On September 1, 2003, in Beziers, a police van is attacked with rockets... On October 4, 2003, the police tried to save Sohane, a 17 year-old girl at the Balzac quarter in Vitry-sur-Seine near Paris, that Djamel was burning alive in a local garbage dumpster. Youth groups attacked the policemen and only after special police forces came to help, did the attack stop.
The policemen did not succeed in saving Sohane, who perished – burned alive!
These areas are fertile ground for Muslim activity: Initially, they employ violence in order to restore order and expel the drug and crime gangs. In Nanterre, a suburb of Paris, Muslims destroyed a café controlled by drug dealers, and the same is true of Lille in northern France:
In March 1991, during the first month of Ramadan after the Gulf War, young people identifying themselves with the cause of Islam wrecked a café in Nanterre which had been the center of the drug trade. It was the first “anti-drug action” associated with Islamism; others followed, notably in the Biscottes project in the south of Lille, in 1993”
The next step is extensive social activity, while complaining about French democratic values:
The French youth places education high on his list of priorities…however he estimates that French education has failed and that its objective is to brainwash young Muslims in an attempt to suppress Islam.
Taking advantage of the law allowing children of immigrants to study the language of their ancestral land, Muslims are at times successful in introducing their representatives into the French educational system and teach values opposed to the values of the Republic:
The curriculum teaching the language and culture of their countries of origin provides the non-French-born students with the opportunity to be educated in their mother tongue in their schools... In the 1980s, with the rise of the re-Islamization movements, the teachers would sometimes serve as religious educators providing an education, which runs counter to the values of the secular, tolerant Republic.
The incidents of violence and rebellion against the law have taken place in the French capital as well. This is what happened during a raid by tax authorities on stalls in the 18th quarter in Paris:
Only the arrival of reinforcements saved our colleagues from tragedy; they were on the verge of being lynched...not far from the police station in Paris’ 18th quarter. The police repaid the debt and began systematically checking 150 people... After 15 minutes, agitation increased and dozens of residents, men, women and children crowded around the police barrier... The police roadblock collapsed under the pressure of the crowd, some threw shoes at the security forces, others threw rocks and bottles, the more restive among them roared: “Long live bin Laden, Allahu Akbar...” The number of assaults against security forces in France rose 14% last year and totaled 19,740 incidents.
The French Muslim students movement, associated with the UIOF and consequently close to the Muslim Brotherhood, has successfully infiltrated the national level of French student representatives by aligning themselves with the large student movements. This student movement is the only religious student movement running in student elections, and although in 200 it received less than 1.5% of the votes, in 2002 it received 8% of the votes. French politicians, among them the Interior Ministry, are aware of this and are not indifferent to the might of the Muslim electorate. They are beginning to attempt to woo that electorate.
The Methods to Achieve the Objective
Achieving the objective is accomplished through varied means, undermining the foundations of democracy by means of a veil on the heads of the women and introducing religious-Muslim values to the schools in the guise of language studies, violent and open anti-Semitism, dominance of Muslim gangs in “no-man’s land”, etc.
Several examples follow:
A pronounced feature of that path is challenging the foundations of FrenchRepublic, taking advantage of that same democracy in order to change it substantially.
The first topic is the veil for women, which does not reflect any popular pressure. These veil cases are only symbols, tiny matters the media deals with because the UOIF and other organizations want it.
In 1989, the debate on the topic began, when two high school students who wore veils were expelled in violation of the neutrality rules in effect in French schools. UIOF representatives acted vigorously on behalf of those girls, which led to an increase in the movement’s prestige in France. Today, that topic is at the center of a public debate, when President Chirac appointed a committee to redefine neutrality (a translation of the word laïcité – meaning willful avoidance by the authorities from expressing positions regarding political or religious opinions, especially in schools and the administration).
This is an astonishing step in light of a 200 year tradition of absolute separation of church and state. It is interesting that while in the Arab countries the argument proffered in favor of the veils is religious, in France, the argument is based on individual freedom and democratic ideals. It is specifically those Muslims who oppose the Muslim Brotherhood’s domination of Islamic life in France, who deciphered what was going on: Thus Djida Tazdaït, who was a delegate in the European Parliament, compared the veil to the “Islamic political flag”, and Vassila Themzali, a lawyer and former director of the UNESCO program for the advancement of women: “The veil has many meanings, but it least of all expresses an act of spiritual faith. The first reason that women wear them today in France is political, and that is extremely dangerous.” The expert, Yves Lacoste, director of the Center for Geopolitical Studies of the University of Paris VII analyzes the topic in the following manner: “Ostensibly religious, however the topic of the veil has a political and even geopolitical aspect, because by means of the behavior of those girls, a manifestation of their Muslim identity symbolized by the veil, the question of control arises: Control over the French Muslim world and perhaps even genuine Muslim control in those quarters cut off from the French Government.”
Additional related cases arise on a daily basis. Thus, at the beginning of the 2003 school year, two girls who arrived with veils on their heads were suspended from their school. Despite their claim that they acted independently, the French intelligence services discovered that they were directed by the UOIF.
Similarly, immediately after the publication of The Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie in England, the UOIF and FNMF (National Federation of Muslims in France) and the Mosque of Paris representatives convened with the demand to prevent the translation and publication of the book in France.
After the French Government approved submission of legislation, which would prohibit wearing veils in schools,58 numerous demonstrations were organized throughout France, in some of which harsh anti-Semitic, anti-Democracy slogans were sounded.
You have a point. LOL
It's such a big "kill box".
Kill A Commie For Mommie
Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes
They didn't mention 'the Muslim Brotherhood' at all in the 9/11 report. maybe they thought it might be too helpful in understanding terrorism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.