Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Feinstein Hints at John Roberts Rejection
NewsMax ^ | Aug. 24, 2005 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 08/25/2005 8:56:27 AM PDT by TBP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: You Dirty Rats

I don't think we do. Kennedy may be outrageous and Kerry may be a traitor, but neither of them has displayed the amount of mind-numbing ignorance I've seen so often from the CA gang.


21 posted on 08/25/2005 9:38:57 AM PDT by fluffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Certainly Bill Clinton tried to balance the court by nominating Ginsberg. </sarcasm


22 posted on 08/25/2005 9:46:28 AM PDT by IamConservative (The true character of a man is revealed in what he does when no one is looking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OESY

He looks like a "Claymation" character in that pic. LOL


23 posted on 08/25/2005 9:49:13 AM PDT by headstamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fluffy

Well, if it's mind-numbing ignorance that you want, how about Washington State? Osama-mama Murray vs. Box-O-Rox and Cantwell vs. DiFi?


24 posted on 08/25/2005 9:57:02 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Forget Cindy; The Problem Is The Left and MSM Who Use Her to Attack Bush AND Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Ralph Neas is the wackiest looking person in public life. The "doll-hair" that resulted from a hair plug job gone terribly wrong is so distracting to me I can't concentrate on what he's saying (maybe that's a good thing). He makes Joe Biden's nest look natural.


25 posted on 08/25/2005 9:57:41 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Inwoodian
Ralph Neas is the wackiest looking person in public life.

Have you never seen Rep. Henry Waxman?

26 posted on 08/25/2005 10:34:45 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TBP

In other breaking news, the sun rose again this morning...


27 posted on 08/25/2005 10:54:20 AM PDT by talleyman (Treason is as treason does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
They need to shut the hell up, or risk looking like they are 1) smearing a good man, or 2) pandering for votes.

They WILL look like they are smearing a good man and pandering for votes.

They are helpless on Roberts. He is cool as a cucumber, he is good as good, and will make the Democrats look like fools to the discerning eyes of American citizens.

28 posted on 08/25/2005 11:17:20 AM PDT by beyond the sea ("I was just the spark the universe chose ....." --- Cindy Sheehan (barf alert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Neas and Waxman separated at birth???
29 posted on 08/25/2005 11:24:12 AM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
if Mass beats Cal for stupid Senators then I think NY may be top dog with Hitlery and scum bag chucky. Amen.
30 posted on 08/25/2005 11:38:08 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Jeez. Neas looks almost as non-human as this sex offender.
31 posted on 08/25/2005 11:43:25 AM PDT by Sloth (Archaeologists test for intelligent design all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Ralph Neas is the wackiest looking person in public life. Have you never seen Rep. Henry Waxman?

How about Dennis Kucinich or Jim Traficant? Box-O-Rox doesn't look too normal, either.

32 posted on 08/25/2005 12:01:36 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Forget Cindy; The Problem Is The Left and MSM Who Use Her to Attack Bush AND Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
I doubt they will filibuster but the most we'll get from their side is maybe 3-4 votes.

If we get a single Dim vote fro Roberts I'll keel over in shock.

33 posted on 08/25/2005 2:07:22 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
I think we'll get Nelson & Lieberman... and just maybe, Landrieu. But like I said, they might just take a long, hard look at what's on the other side of the aisle and say;

“These turds ain't got the guts to go nuclear... lets call their bluff!”

34 posted on 08/25/2005 2:26:47 PM PDT by johnny7 (“What now? Let me tell you what now.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I expect Reid (and Hillary) will make this a party loyalty vote, with all sorts of dire reprisals agaianst any Dim who breaks ranks over Roberts. They'll have the full support and backing of MoveOn and the other leftist groups in making the "traitors'" lives miserable.

My fear is that the Dims won't even need to filibuster, that they'll be able to count on enough RINOs jumping the GOP ship to defeat the Roberts nomination on an up-an-down floor vote. Snowe and Specter are already slipping away, and that means they'll take Collins and Chafee with them for certain. And that leaves lots of room for mischief for the likes of Voinovich and Hagel. The Rats then get to have their cake and eat it too - they shoot down Roberts and keep the filibuster for another day.


35 posted on 08/25/2005 2:51:46 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

I don't know if you ever noticed this, but... It appears to others (who I have talked to) and myself, that liberals have a distinctly stupid look about them. I can usually pick liberals out of a crowd with uncanny accuracy to the amazement of friends.

Liberals do have a certain personae that is physically manifest. We need to come up with a term for it (sarcasm on - - a-hole-us-gigantis??? - - /sarcasm off).


36 posted on 08/25/2005 6:28:45 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson