Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There is no bubble
Free Republic | 8/24/05 | Self

Posted on 08/24/2005 6:58:33 AM PDT by austinite

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: irishjuggler

"montly" = "monthly"


61 posted on 09/12/2005 5:12:25 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh
But also diversifying by building a storage business.

That's not exactly diversification since storage is connected to RE and is based on RE. But for now storage should do pretty well as people sell, store their furniture and rent. You can probably get them for a few years while they wait for the RE market to shake out. But after that, lots of luck.

62 posted on 09/12/2005 5:25:23 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
How quickly we forget that rates were higher than 10% as recently as 15 years ago. Why can't that happen again?

Short term rates (which ARMs are based on) will be held as low as possible while maintaining the "strong dollar" rhetoric. But long term rates could shoot up if the Asians decide to stop the gravy train. Ironically they could do that if they see such low short term rates that they lose long term confidence in the dollar.

63 posted on 09/12/2005 5:33:48 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: austinite

We tried to buy a house in Austin and were basically priced out. We found a great deal in a neighboring county that was well within our budget. If our house was in Austin city limits it would be worth 3 to 4 times as much. I think I'd rather just have a home I can afford NOW and not woory about trying to make it our nest-egg.


64 posted on 09/12/2005 5:57:56 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Here's a question: Could higher fuel costs this winter push a lot of folks over the financial edge?


65 posted on 09/12/2005 6:01:43 AM PDT by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: durasell

People around here (northern VA) with modest homes and heat pumps should do ok since our electricity comes mostly from coal, nuclear and hydro. But speculators who bought tract mansions in Loudoun county hoping to flip them might be surprised at their natural gas bills. I don't see any signs of panic yet, but the inventory is very high for this time of year (about 500 new or pretty new tract mansions for sale).


66 posted on 09/12/2005 6:07:07 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: palmer

I've looked at blue prints and design drawings for those types of houses (haven't been in one, yet)and they seem horribly inefficient. For instance, all of them have a fetish for large entranceways/foyers leading to the second floor. Also, gigantic master suites etc. If you look at the drawings long enough, you're reminded of the old Caddies with tailfins.


67 posted on 09/12/2005 6:13:53 AM PDT by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: austinite

And yet home ownership goes up every year.


68 posted on 09/12/2005 6:15:28 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinite

Only one lesson here, don't be the last guy in.


69 posted on 09/12/2005 6:19:33 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinite
Per the WH

"The US homeownership rate reached a record 69.2 percent in the second quarter of 2004. The number of homeowners in the United States reached 73.4 million, the most ever. And for the first time, the majority of minority Americans own their own homes."

Increasing Homeownership

70 posted on 09/12/2005 6:20:26 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

What's your point?


71 posted on 09/12/2005 6:21:30 AM PDT by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: durasell

I was responding to austinite's comments, particularly "Who cares if the average income family can no longer afford the average home." The facts don't seem to support that contention. Homeownership is at an all-time high and for the first time, the majority of minorities own their homes. There are federal programs to make home ownership more accessible to the average family (see the link).


72 posted on 09/12/2005 6:27:45 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: kabar

That's true and in many cases it's a good thing.

However, being of gloomy disposition, I see the dark side. A lot of people have taken out screwy mortgages and a lot of people for reasons of ego or temporary insanity, have bought more home than they can reasonably expect to maintain.


73 posted on 09/12/2005 6:31:14 AM PDT by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: All

74 posted on 09/12/2005 6:31:18 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Facts are stubborn things, anecdotal information or emotions (gloomy disposition) aside. An uninformed opinion is just that.


75 posted on 09/12/2005 6:33:29 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Record levels of home ownership and a bubble are not mutually exclusive. There was, if I recall correctly, record numbers of people buying stocks in the run up to the dot com debacle.

I have read reports indicating that a record number of people are buying homes using interest only loans. Wages haven't increased appreciably to keep up with the rise in cost of the homes. And many of the homes themselves being built are just plain nuts.


76 posted on 09/12/2005 6:40:10 AM PDT by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: durasell; kabar
have bought more home than they can reasonably expect to maintain

See my tagline. I call them homeholders because they don't own anything. The government issues them a "title" that enables the government to collect rent on the property. Many of the newer homeholders that the WH brags about are bagholders in the recent property price runup ponzi scheme. Even inner city prices here (Washington DC) are unbelievable.

77 posted on 09/12/2005 6:46:48 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: palmer

I blame television.


78 posted on 09/12/2005 6:50:00 AM PDT by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Record levels of home ownership and a bubble are not mutually exclusive. There was, if I recall correctly, record numbers of people buying stocks in the run up to the dot com debacle.

Who said they were? Market forces will prevail in the long run.

I have read reports indicating that a record number of people are buying homes using interest only loans. Wages haven't increased appreciably to keep up with the rise in cost of the homes. And many of the homes themselves being built are just plain nuts.

There are various kinds of interest only loans. You can get an interest only conventional fixed rate loan, which has the first ten years interest only and the next 20 principle/interest. If home costs exceed the ability of people to afford them, the prices will go down. That's the way the market works.

And many of the homes themselves being built are just plain nuts.

You are entitled to your opinion. You are not required to buy them.

79 posted on 09/12/2005 7:04:27 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: palmer
See my tagline. I call them homeholders because they don't own anything. The government issues them a "title" that enables the government to collect rent on the property.

Government, banks, etc. provide the mortgage loans and guarantees with the houses being used as collateral. It is a business decision. What's wrong with that? Most people move several times during their lives so who cares whether you pay off the house or not?

Many of the newer homeholders that the WH brags about are bagholders in the recent property price runup ponzi scheme.

The government and the banks are the ultimate "bagholders" if the buyers walk away. Frankly, I don't understand what the fuss is all about. People buy stocks, bonds, jewelry, antiques, etc. as investments. There is a risk involved. I bought my house in 1979 and it has increased in value almost six times. Another investment property in a different market has only increased three times its value since 1984. If I had it to do over again, I would have bought in a different market.

Even inner city prices here (Washington DC) are unbelievable.

Not really. They will continue to go up with the gentrification of the city and the increased commuting times involved in living in the suburbs. Housing values in DC will continue to rise along with those inside the Beltway. The further out you go, the cheaper the prices. Montgomery (Maryland) and Fairfax (Virginia)counties are among the top ten in the country in terms of household income. Unemployment is very low and the USG makes the area almost recession proof.

80 posted on 09/12/2005 7:22:19 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson