Posted on 08/23/2005 9:22:32 AM PDT by knighthawk
If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
I hope Bush has the balls to tell the UN where to shove it.
Get us and mainly our money out of the UN.
ON, please
Variant(s): also sovran
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English soverain, from Middle French, from Old French, from (assumed) Vulgar Latin superanus, from Latin super over, above -- more at OVER
1 a : superlative in quality : EXCELLENT b : of the most exalted kind : SUPREME c : having generalized curative powers d : of an unqualified nature : UNMITIGATED e : having undisputed ascendancy : PARAMOUNT
2 a : possessed of supreme power b : unlimited in extent : ABSOLUTE c : enjoying autonomy : INDEPENDENT
3 : relating to, characteristic of, or befitting a sovereign
synonym see FREE
- sov·er·eign·ly adverb
Source: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
Me too, but I don't think he'll do anything. We are getting "sustainable development" now from the local planners via HUD via the UN. Lets not forget the UN Agenda 21 protocol that is being adopted nationwide.
We've got to stand up to these UN observers and let our local politicians know they will be voted out of office for even allowing them in the meetings.
ON, unfortunately. They reallly want to sneak in that bit of nastiness, don't they? Just D*mn.
Don't believe me? Whatch what happens to McMainiac as he attempts to become president.
Even many brain dead Democrats will balk at that one.
Build their gallows gallows high
http://www.eco.freedom.org/el/20050801/cosman.shtml
The ultimate purpose of Agenda 21's Sustainable Development is to create one classless global society, living under global budgets in a series of human settlements in harmony with the environment. There, all people, all generations, and all species are equal. There, no disparities exist in the grand global biodiversity. Economically, there are no rich and no poor. Ecologically, human life is not predator against other life forms. Intellectually, mind and reason are not more powerful than urge and appetite. Politically, calm, quiet, dull stasis replaces rapacious, creative progress.
What a crock!
Absolutely!
Read this; http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1466663/posts
DITTO, DITTO, DITTO
I'm glad we aren't waiting around for Senate Obstructionists to finally approve a UN Ambassador.
So, if I read this right, the UN is picking up from where Joe Stalin left off?
Thanks for the ping.
3. The section on human rights calls for "equal participation and representation of men and women in government decision-making bodies." Again, a very nice sentiment but one with a problem. To implement it as the U.N. expects, governments would have to nominate members of Congress. In democracies, however, it is voters rather than governments who choose their representatives -- and they are statistically unlikely to choose a cross section of the population.In other words, the most sensitive and vital political questions are removed from democratic parliaments and the voters and handed over to an international committee nominated by foreign and often despotic regimes.
If the European Union wants to surrender to the UN so be it, but GW must oppose to the UN document. We don't need foreign committees to govern ourselves.
Too bad its well underway in the United States, and it is in every "free trade" agreement we sign with other "member states".
The Iraqi constitution is a prime example of a UN government.
No American should be dying in a foreign country in order to implement the UN's version of a governmental system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.