Skip to comments.
FED'L MENTAL HEALTH TESTING FOR SCHOOL CHILDREN
Cong. Ron Paul - www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2004/tst091304.htm
| 8-22-05
| American Spirit
Posted on 08/22/2005 2:55:20 PM PDT by american spirit
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: american spirit
Are they going to test the administrators and teachers too? Maybe they should START THERE!!!
2
posted on
08/22/2005 2:56:19 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Our military......the world's HEROES!)
To: american spirit
Haven't heard a peep!
Shudders for public school parents and kids!
3
posted on
08/22/2005 2:57:01 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: american spirit
You don't think that POLITICS will influence the test, do you?????
4
posted on
08/22/2005 2:58:04 PM PDT
by
SteveMcKing
("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
To: american spirit
Just thinking about it ... didn't Bush pass something that took the teeth out of school systems medicating kids with out the knowledge and permission of the parent? I thought I heard something about that - about a month ago.
Haven't heard anything about coerced mental testing.
5
posted on
08/22/2005 2:59:12 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: american spirit
I'd say the group most in need of mental health screening is public officials, and most specifically Senators.
To: american spirit
Both last year and this year we were given a form where we had to identify the areas where our children would most benefit from counseling. We were to rank them based on order of importance (things like grief counseling to anger management to study habits).
I would suspect that these forms represent a sort of soft launch of this program. But there has been no notification for us of screenings ... yet.
7
posted on
08/22/2005 3:00:55 PM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(Nemo me impune lacessit)
To: thoughtomator
Here's a new tagline to illustrate:
8
posted on
08/22/2005 3:01:16 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Hey Senator! Leave those kids alone!)
To: american spirit
Don't listen to him!
Ron Paul is just another Constitution-quoting, book-reading losertarian!!!
It's all being done for the future of the children, don't you know!
9
posted on
08/22/2005 3:07:37 PM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
To: american spirit
God I'm glad I don't have kids to have to subject to our public school system.
To: thoughtomator
Let's see. Johnny asks too many questions the teacher can't answer, so they call him ADD. They call in a counselor working with the school, who agrees. They require Johnny to see a doctor, who also works with the school. Doctor recommends medication. Parents disagree, try to protest, are charged by DHS with neglect, and Johnny is medicated and taken away to a foster home.
This isn't a crazy future. This has already happened in some districts.
11
posted on
08/22/2005 3:11:13 PM PDT
by
Bhrian
To: nmh
...Haven't heard anything about coerced mental testing....
I heard about it. Thought it was a bad idea. Don't know if it went forward or not.
I think if a kid has real problems it would be evident to a lay person. I don't see any need for screening all kids, since most kids are normal. Something like this kind of assumes that mental illness in children is an epidemic of such proportion as to compare it to mandatory vacinations for disease.
Granted, I don't work in the CYA world of the public school system, nor do I send my kids there for their educations.
It is a fact though that if the school wants to test your kids mental health, and you refuse, they can test them anyway without your approval.
That I think is enough power, maybe even too much.
12
posted on
08/22/2005 3:11:21 PM PDT
by
planekT
(No fence, no vote.)
To: Bhrian
I was a few short years too old to be a prime candidate for that... I asked a LOT of questions.
13
posted on
08/22/2005 3:12:52 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Hey Senator! Leave those kids alone!)
To: thoughtomator
Hey Senator! Leave those kids alone
We don't need nooooo mental testinggggg.....
14
posted on
08/22/2005 3:14:15 PM PDT
by
Stellar Dendrite
( Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. -Churchill)
To: Bhrian
I figure being conservative, especially if you are also religous, will be deemed a mental illness. That way they get to medicate the "bigots" and the "homophobes."
To: planekT
Good info.......I just figure as sneaky as these politicians and pharmaceutical companies are they're working overtime behind the scenes to force this on school age kids without the knowledge of most parents.
To: american spirit
I need to dust off my soap box, it's been a while since I made one of my speeches.
Mental illnesses are serious conditions that need to be treated. One of the best treatments for a lot of conditions are the various medications that we've heard so much about.
Brain scans of kids with ADD or ADHD show brains that are severely distorted. Putting those same brains on medications results in scans being more "normal". (Actually the brain scans of people with ADD/ADHD tend to look like brain scans of people on illicit drugs.) If your doctor recommends that your child would do better on a medication, then for Heaven's sake, try it. Don't send your child up the river just because the med has a bad PR.
All that being said -- I don't think forced mental evaluation of all school children is a good thing. But I do think the teacher MAY have an idea (and in some families, unfortunately a BETTER idea) than the parents may have about the child in question.
It's a different world now than when we were kids. Students are subject to a lot different types of stressors than they were 20 years ago. It's only natural to see more cases of depression and anxiety. And, from personal experience, it's better to get treatment at a younger age than it is when it flares up for real in your 20s.
But I can appreciate the concerns.
17
posted on
08/22/2005 3:24:10 PM PDT
by
birbear
(Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
To: SittinYonder
Yeah, I'd agree on the "soft launch" idea.......I'm quite sure the local school officials didn't dream up a form like that on their own volition. Could've been a premature "shot across the bow" just to see where the opposition might come from.
To: diverteach
God I'm glad I don't have kids to have to subject to our public school system.Same here!
My youngest graduated in 1987....
I have 2 grandsons in a Christian Academy..Thank God!
They have never (nor will they ever) set foot in a public school.
19
posted on
08/22/2005 3:28:36 PM PDT
by
the Deejay
(THE LADY DEEJAY)
To: american spirit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson