Posted on 08/21/2005 2:01:27 AM PDT by Brit_Guy
I would double check that source. I'm 5-8, 154 lbs, and most would consider me somewhat slim. To be another 7 inches taller and have only an extra 30 pounds, one would have to be quite skinny.
that wasn't the government, that was Philo.
1. Multiply your weight, in pounds, by 0.45 (example: 130 pounds x 0.45 = 58.5).
2. Multiply your height, in inches, by 0.025 (example: 5¹6' or 66' x 0.25 = 1.65).
3. Multiply the answer from step 2 by itself (example: 1.65 x 1.65 = 2.7225).
4. Divide the answer from step 1 by the answer from step 3 (example: 58.5 ÷ 1.65 = 21.48).
5. If your body mass index rates below 21, you are underweight.
6. If your body mass index rates above 27, you are overweight.
7. A BMI of more than 40 indicates that you are obese.
that wasn't the government, that was Philo.
http://weightloss.about.com/c/ht/00/07/How_Calculate_Body_Mass0962933779.htm You were sayin?
I'm pretty close to it according to those calculations... I rate a 23 on that scale.
Condolences to his family and his teammates.
"There are many causes for SCD. Below age 35 the problem is usually a structural abnormality in the heart muscle, valves, or coronary arteries. These conditions are usually congenital and are difficult to detect. Gross abnormalities are identified at birth or in early childhood (e.g.., the child who gets very short of breath and turns blue running across the playground and is then found to have a heart murmur). However, more subtle abnormalities may not cause any symptoms, allow full athletic development and then suddenly cause death during exercise. One famous example is Pete Maravich (sp?) who had a completely successful NBA career, retired, and then fell dead while playing a recreational B-Ball game. He was found to have an anomalous origin of one of his coronary arteries -- an exceptionally rare congenital abnormality that if triggered just right completely shuts off blood flow to the majority of the heart muscle. No physical exam or routine testing would have identified this."
exactly. Now do the BMI at 6'3" 315
The problem is that the formula is bad. Mass increases with the cube of volume; height/mass is an unsatisfactory substitute for volume.
I agree they tightened this index a few years ago for some apparent reason. Now know one agrees with it. Imagine what
body builders think of this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.