Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

YES, EVOLUTION STILL HAS UNANSWERED QUESTIONS; THAT'S HOW SCIENCE IS
WSJ ^ | June 3, 2005 | Sharon Begley

Posted on 08/21/2005 1:18:04 AM PDT by MRMEAN

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-511 next last
To: spunkets
"Gen 3:2-3 The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.'"

Blows that claim don't it. "

That shows they were told what not to do, but they didn't have an understanding of what was right and wrong until they ate of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of right and wrong. When my niece was 1 I could tell her not to do something, that it was wrong, but she had no comprehension of right and wrong. She knew what I was saying, just not the depth of it. Adam and Eve were like my niece at 1 morally.

If they already had knowledge of right and wrong, what was the big deal of eating a fruit off the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil? God KNEW they were going to eat that fruit, yet he made Adam and Eve imperfect and unable to follow his commands. Punishing them for His mistake is evil. If it wasn't a mistake, that makes it worse. The whole Genesis story is a crock anyway, but even on the face of it it makes no sense.
461 posted on 08/22/2005 1:14:52 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

"Were you born with a regenerated spirit? If so, you are only the third person in all humanity to have done so and have made God a liar. I suspect you might not have as righteous a spirit naturally within you as one might think."

I was born innocent, as were you, as were all who have lived. The concept of original sin is evil because it puts the sin of the parents on the children. Anybody who can look at a newborn baby and say, "This one is stained with sin* is either a monster or belongs in a mental ward. There can be no sin without choice. A newborn has made no choices. All newborns are without sin.


462 posted on 08/22/2005 1:19:31 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: BMCDA

I'm not certain "granted" is the right word. Maybe "recognized?"


463 posted on 08/22/2005 1:22:02 PM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

If you have no knowledge of right an wrong, how do you know it is wrong to disobey? What would "wrong" even mean?

And if you have never seen death, how do yo know it is bad?


464 posted on 08/22/2005 1:23:42 PM PDT by js1138 (Science has it all: the fun of being still, paying attention, writing down numbers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
"We have been made so that we cannot avoid sin."

Nonsense.

Why then is the avoidance of sin never offered as a path to heaven? If sin is avoidable then we should avoid it, not commit it and then repent it.

You don't end up in hell for committing finite sin. Rejecting the Holy Spirit is not a finite sin. It's a lifestyle choice. It indicates exactly where your heart is.

So you don't end up in hell for sin? You end up in hell for making a lifestyle choice? Infinite punishment for an incorrect choice that isn't even sinful! Wow.

465 posted on 08/22/2005 1:29:19 PM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
"When my niece was 1 I could tell her not to do something, that it was wrong, but she had no comprehension of right and wrong.

LOL! ...one. They were adults made in the image and likeness of God. They knew the score.

"what was the big deal of eating a fruit off the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil?

Says right there. Satan tempted them to be like God. To take a short cut to eternal life.

"God KNEW they were going to eat that fruit, yet he made Adam and Eve imperfect and unable to follow his commands."

He made them in His image and likeness. What more could they ask for.

"Punishing them for His mistake is evil. If it wasn't a mistake, that makes it worse. "

Right, He should have made folks better than Himself, because He should have known how hard it would be to work and make the right choices on their own like He did. After all, children are always entitled to more than their parents have, especially the miscreant children.

466 posted on 08/22/2005 1:33:18 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
We are made so we do not avoid sin, not so that was can not avoid sin.

Your distinction evades me. A semantic difference that makes no difference.

Who is blaming us?

God, apparently, or does God punish those who are not blameworthy in His eyes?

How is giving someone what they expect a punishment

What has expectation got to do with it? If a bank-robber is caught he'll expect to be sent to the pen. By your logic that is not a punishment because he expected it. And what of those who make the mistake of worshipping the wrong deity? They may be expecting a different infinite reward and they get nothing, just the same as the atheist.

When you can create a universe, you can create it with the rules you think are more fair.

Ah, the "might is right" school of theology.

Why would anyone want an eternity with someone they don't want in their life now?

How smug can you get in your good fortune at having picked the right deity. Maybe they were misled into not wanting that person in their life. An eternity of punishment for making a mistake, and picking the same deity to worship as their friends and neighbours for most people in the world, rather than realising that the Christian God of which they are barely aware is the true one to recognise.

467 posted on 08/22/2005 1:37:57 PM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I'm not certain "granted" is the right word. Maybe "recognized?"

Uhm... not really. "Recognized" might be the first step but ultimately rights have to be granted in order to exist in any meaningful way.
And it doesn't always have to be some higher authority which grants rights but it can also be a group of peers who grant certain rights to each others. So while those within this group have certain rights wrt each other, those outside the group don't.

468 posted on 08/22/2005 1:40:29 PM PDT by BMCDA (Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must be silent. -- L. Wittgenstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite
"If sin is avoidable then we should avoid it, not commit it and then repent it."

How hard is it to keep the commandments?

"Infinite punishment for an incorrect choice that isn't even sinful! Wow."

The only "Wow" that's justified is your blowing over and ignoring the words of Matt 12:32 I posted in bold in #454.

469 posted on 08/22/2005 1:41:38 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

Non-answers and non-sequiturs noted.


470 posted on 08/22/2005 1:42:55 PM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

You didn't answer the question. Were you born with a regenerated spirit when you came out of the womb?

(BTW, a person who drives 22 in a 20mph school zone is also guilty of a sin. That doesn't make that person the most heinous thing imaginable, but God the Father only has fellowship with things that are holy, righteous and just. Unless you inately possess something that is spiritually righteous in terms of divine righteousness, it will be counted as good for nothingness and placed with other things that are good for nothingness upon the Great White Throne Judgment.)


471 posted on 08/22/2005 1:43:05 PM PDT by Cvengr (<;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
"LOL! ...one. They were adults made in the image and likeness of God. They knew the score."

Except he forgot to give them the knowledge of good and evil, or else their eating the fruit of said tree would have had no affect.

"Says right there. Satan tempted them to be like God. To take a short cut to eternal life."

They didn't eat of the Tree of Life, they ate of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. They didn't choose eternal life, they wanted knowledge. The search for knowledge became the original sin. It's still under attack today.

"He made them in His image and likeness. What more could they ask for"

They could have asked for the knowledge of good and evil. Then they would have known that disobeying God was a sin, and they would have known what a sin was.

"He should have made folks better than Himself, because He should have known how hard it would be to work and make the right choices on their own like He did. After all, children are always entitled to more than their parents have, especially the miscreant children."

Now you're losing it. Where did I say that He should have made them BETTER then Himself? They were not given the knowledge of Good and Evil and were punished for it. It was God's mistake or God's cruelty.

"He should have known how hard it would be to work and make the right choices on their own like He did." God can be tempted to do wrong? How is that reconciled with his alleged perfection?
Again, the whole story is nonsense, but the eternal logic of it is immoral on the face of it. "
472 posted on 08/22/2005 1:47:10 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Says right there. Satan tempted them to be like God. To take a short cut to eternal life.

Where is Satan mentioned in Genesis? I must have missed that part in Hebrew school.

473 posted on 08/22/2005 1:48:58 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Where is Satan mentioned in Genesis? I must have missed that part in Hebrew school.

Apparently the talking snake? Created by God, presumably.

474 posted on 08/22/2005 1:50:39 PM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

"You didn't answer the question. Were you born with a regenerated spirit when you came out of the womb? "

I don't believe in souls and other spirits. I was born innocent, as everybody is. The idea that we are guilty of sin at birth is a monstrosity made up by people who want to crush Man's spirit and make him think he is a born degenerate. A great way to keep the masses obedient and quiet.

How can a person commit a sin before they can make any choices? It's an impossibility.


475 posted on 08/22/2005 1:53:16 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
" Where did I say that He should have made them BETTER then Himself?

Right here: "They could have asked for the knowledge of good and evil. Then they would have known that disobeying God was a sin, and they would have known what a sin was."Where'd God get His instructions and apples from? It's a story and they took what did not belong to them.

"God can be tempted to do wrong?

Yes.

" How is that reconciled with his alleged perfection?"

His perfection comes, because He made the right choices. He even forgives some of those that don't. The ones He doesn't forgive decided God's choices and moral code are undesireable.

"The search for knowledge became the original sin."

There's no such thing as original sin. Neither the Jews, or Jesus recognized it. It's a doctrine created by Augustine and the council of Orange.

476 posted on 08/22/2005 2:03:36 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
"Where is Satan mentioned in Genesis? I must have missed that part in Hebrew school."

Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, "Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?"

Unless of course you think animals talk and conspire to corrupt man.

Also, Gen 3:15
And I will put enmity
between you and the woman,
and between your offspring and hers;
he will crush your head,
and you will strike his heel."

The woman is Mary and her offspring is Jesus. The serpent's offspring is anyone that is wicked. I wouldn't expect that to be taught in Hebrew school though.

477 posted on 08/22/2005 2:17:20 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

"" Where did I say that He should have made them BETTER then Himself?"



Right here: "They could have asked for the knowledge of good and evil. Then they would have known that disobeying God was a sin, and they would have known what a sin was."Where'd God get His instructions and apples from? It's a story and they took what did not belong to them. "


So having the knowledge of Good and Evil and knowing what sin is would have made Adam and Eve BETTER than God? How? Yes, they took what didn't belong to them, but they had no knowledge of Good and Evil so it couldn't be a sin.

"His perfection comes, because He made the right choices."

Who could have tempted Him? What could God do that would be considered a sin? A sin against whom?

"There's no such thing as original sin"

Then we are all born innocent. :) That was my original (pun not intended) point. Glad I could turn ya around! :)


478 posted on 08/22/2005 2:21:55 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
I know that that's how Christians interpret Genesis 3. My point is that it is hardly a "literal" interpretation of the text.

I, myself, am a theistic evolutionist; I am persuaded by the evidence supporting the theory of evolution, and have no problem reconciling that theory with my belief that God created us. The chief objectors to the TOE seem to be people who claim that it conflicts with a "literal" reading of Genesis, while simultaneously reading the text in a non-literal way.

479 posted on 08/22/2005 2:22:38 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
"So having the knowledge of Good and Evil and knowing what sin is would have made Adam and Eve BETTER than God? How?"

Where'd God get His instructions and apples from?

"Who could have tempted Him?

Did you forget, God was a man.

" What could God do that would be considered a sin?"

He could be like Allah, or actually been the one to conjure up original sin.

" A sin against whom?"

Other folks.

480 posted on 08/22/2005 2:36:55 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-511 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson