Posted on 08/20/2005 8:00:43 PM PDT by 4lifeandliberty
They probably have a policy for posting material of significance to the community and even a table for distributing other material.
I'd get a copy of their policy and then attempt to accomplish what you hope to through their own policies.
So this guy did it on purpose ~ big deal ~ folks taking out the books were not forced to read the stuff.
I view such things as just part of the process of having public lending libraries. Obviously the Head Librarian at that particular library is a fascist pig, eh?!
Parental supervision is a better control than having the state tell me what I, as an adult, may access off of the internet.
I am not surprised. As I said, the letter was not unexpected. This, however, won't stop me from opposing sin wherever it rears it's head even if it is in a public library.
softwarecreator wrote:
"Although your cause may be noble, do you feel like that is the right place for you to put your "information" when it is clearly stated that you cannot do so?"
My reply:
The short answer is yes.
cyborg wrote:
"Some people get a little obsessed about saving people from the consequences of their choices."
My response:
You've got that right. I even heard of a man who let himself be nailed to a tree to save people from the consequencse of their sin. Talk about obsessive!
I don't equate mere human beings with God.
The filters are in place for children only and as an adult you would have complete access.
softwarecreator wrote:
"I agree with you. No one can debate that the guy's cause is a good one, but ...
Hanging around in library bathrooms kinda makes you a bit creepy, you know? If I went into a bathroom and some guy, who was obviously hanging out there, came around the corner trying to "hand" me something, he would be requiring medical attention real fast."
Let's stick to reality here. No one was every hanging out in a bathroom passing out literature. A piece of literature was found on the bathroom sink.
jude24 wrote:
"Why should you have the right to distribute your fliers in library books? Should that right be extended to Planned Parenthood as well?
And, as regards internet pornography, who appointed you the judge of what others should or should not be able to access? Bearing in mind, I write this a pro-lifer who considers pornography dangerous to the mind. But neither you nor I have the authority to tell anyone else what they can research."
"Now thou son of man, wilt thou judge, wilt thou judge the bloody city? yea, thou shalt shew her all her abominations." Ezek. 22:2
I know I would take offense, and do, to people trying to push their personal agendas on me. I just wonder if you would have a problem with the Pro-Abortion zeolots sticking brochures at you.
Well, unless it grew out of the procelain, you had to have been hanging around there to put it on the sink. And let's not pretend that you just happened to need to use the facilities and just happen to have a brochure with you, because that is too far fetched. As I said before ... creepy.
Cvengr wrote:
"Our King doesn't direct us to disobey legitimate authority. Neither does our action as do-gooder's elevate or promote a Christian way of life. We all have opportunities to witness and are commanded to do so, but that witness needs to lead one to Him on His grounds."
I assume you are opposed to smuggling Bibles into closed (by the lawful Authorities) Countries also. How about preaching even when the lawful authority forbids it?
One book had detailed conversations of teenage boys boasting of their sexual escapades. This went on for several pages.
When my daughter came out, I made her read some of the material in the book. "Did you know that was in there?" I asked. She denied any knowledge.
We drove back to the library and I tore the book in half and put it in the return slot.
Two wrights made an airplane.
Good for you.
I'd go to the city council and get the policy changed. They pay the money for the libary budget.
National governance is one of four divine istitutions established by God. It is designed for believer and unbeliever alike for responsible behavior within the world.
The other three institutions include human dominion or volition, marriage, and family.
We have received the Great Commission to communicate the gospel to the world.
If one attempts to use the Great Commission as justification to disobey authority, one may want to be sure that they are not disobeying the will of God by disobeying legitimate authority designed to govern believer and unbeliever alike.
There are many occasions when a do-gooder falls into a trap of legalism or ultra-conservatism, ignoring the chaos they cause in their wake when they act self-righteously while not filled with the spirit.
More tactfully, there may be tests ongoing in the plan of God, where such an unbelieving nation plays a different role in the history of mankind, e.g. as an example for the angelic domain. In such a situation, a Crusader rushing forward in direct disobedience to legitimate authority merely places him in an act of disobedience to the institutions God has established. Such an action might even prolong the national disobedience or harden hearts further from turning to the Lord.
On the opposite realm of possibility, there might be systems of governance wherein illegitimate actions have given temporary power to some persons opposing the will of God, in which one might appeal to a higher legitimate authority and successfully win, thereby having legitimate authority to deliver Bibles and preach accordingly to particular unbelievers it sought to reach earlier.
The object of fulfilling the Great Commission does not supercede the believer's walk with the Lord. If an apparant paradox arises, our priority is to remain in fellowship with Him through Christ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.