Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WSJ: One Simple Rate - A flat tax would uleash a stupendous economic boom, by Steve Forbes
Wall Street Journal ^ | August 15, 2005 | STEVE FORBES

Posted on 08/15/2005 5:55:06 AM PDT by OESY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 541-560 next last
To: Mind-numbed Robot
CPAs will do what cobol programmers did.

My accountant will be just a busy as always, paying my 50 plus bills each week and tracking my business. Maybe a few less forms to file, but still has to report income of our employees to the SS office and still has to file and submit payments (much bigger payments I might add) to the tax collector. I would perfer the much smaller tax payments in exchange for the extra payroll forms.

81 posted on 08/15/2005 9:16:06 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
And advocates of the "Fair" tax will never tell you that the 16th Amendment will still be in place,

I am a Fair (no need for parentheses)Tax advocate and I will tell you that it is not as important as we think. First, even if the amendment were passed we have to be vigilant that it is not ignored as our present court system ignores the Constitution now. So, if we are going to have to monitor the law ignorers, or Constitution abusers, why not just monitor their adherence to the Fair Tax? You can rest assured the country would be much more alert to such abuse than they have been the creeping and hidden abuse of the past. Even with the Fair Tax there are still a lot of hidden taxes, like on our telephone bills, etc, that must be rooted out and eliminated.

The Fair Tax is no panacea, or fixer of all problems, but it is a damn good start in the right direction.

...and there has to be some type of agency to collect the revenues.

Much of that is already in place in the states. There would have to be additional federal agents to assist but not nearly what we have now in the IRS.

82 posted on 08/15/2005 9:17:41 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Reqe that again, D.C.. Subtitle A & B are the income tax provisions and the payroll tax provisions respectively ... and they ARE repealed by the FairTax - just as it says.

The bill also calls for the repeal of the 16th amendment as does this from the FairTax website:

http://www.fairtaxvolunteer.org/smart/faq-main.html#42


83 posted on 08/15/2005 9:26:05 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Our tax rate IS already "flat." I think we have something like two rates. Its the power Congress wields through the tax code that needs to be destroyed...


84 posted on 08/15/2005 9:27:34 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

Then they get to pay their 30% when they bring their new toys into the country.


85 posted on 08/15/2005 9:29:09 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Don't worry about us CPA's. We'll be fine.


86 posted on 08/15/2005 9:30:42 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: XRdsRev

You would receive .25% of the tax you collect as a fee under that Fair Tax.


87 posted on 08/15/2005 9:31:34 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
That can't be. The fair taxers have promised us their bill gets rid of all lobbyists.

We never said that. I'm sure there will be plenty on the spending side.

88 posted on 08/15/2005 9:33:00 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

"30% sales tax any time we go to the mall"

i don't know were i stand on this issue yet, i kinda like the flat tax too. however stupid statements like that are not helping any. the fact you come up with 30% shows you know better.

grow up.


89 posted on 08/15/2005 9:33:24 AM PDT by postaldave (dont ask me, i'm just a simple post birth, tissue mass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE
In either case I hope that businesses still would get tax write offs for expenses. If they do not, we will be hosed.You do. Every bit of your expenses are deductible. And every bit of your revenue is not taxed. Businesses don't pay the Fair Tax! Didn't you know that?
90 posted on 08/15/2005 9:35:38 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE

Even if you can't lower your prices, your clients will not have to pay with after tax dollars, so they can afford your services. I don't know what kind of business you are in, but if you are selling services to businesses they won't pay the Fair Tax.


91 posted on 08/15/2005 9:37:29 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Check the language of the Bill. It ain't in there. Repeals the Code, but not the Amendment. A different piece of legislation is being called on to do that, the HJ Res 61 I mentioned. Absent that, the LAW might be gone, but the power would remain. Replacing the law would be easy.

The Bill could "call" for the repeal of almost anything. They've had bills with numberous findings of facts that the Second Amendment is an "individual Right" and that is can't be "infringed". But I noticed that the BATFE is still in existance...

Unless it is part of the text of the Bill that contains the actual legal context, it ain't squat.

92 posted on 08/15/2005 9:38:55 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
The only weakness of the Fair Tax is it is still vulnerable to crooked and greedy politicians. If we get rid of those we could eliminate many, many problems.

Unfortunately I can think of no way to accomplish this that won't have the Secret Service/FBI knocking at JimRob's, and my, doors.

93 posted on 08/15/2005 9:47:00 AM PDT by Uncle Fud (Imagine the President calling fascism a "religion of peace" in 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
And advocates of the "Fair" tax will never tell you that the 16th Amendment will still be in place,...

We'll now you're just being dishonest. Here, I'll say it. "H.R. 25, the Fair Tax Act of 2005, does not repeal the 16th amendment. You can't repeal a constitutional amendment in a tax bill. You have to pass a constitutional amendment on its own, then have it ratified by the states. You can't do that in a tax bill. Also, you have to have something to replace the income tax with before you can repeal the amendment. However, the Fair Tax bill does completely repeal all sections of the tax code dealing with personal and corporate income taxes, estate taxes and payroll taxes. It also totally eliminates the Internal Revenue Service. It also calls for the destruction of all income tax returns filed previously." There ya go.

and there has to be some type of agency to collect the revenues.

The states will collect and enforce the tax revenues from the retailers. A much smaller agency than the IRS within Treasury will collect the taxes from the states. Individuals will most likely never deal with this agency. Individuals will never file a federal income tax return again.

94 posted on 08/15/2005 9:49:16 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl

Don't be "spooked". Get educated. www.fairtax.org


95 posted on 08/15/2005 9:51:03 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

You know, the Unabomber used less words than you do.


96 posted on 08/15/2005 9:52:16 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

If you can get the amendment AND the Fair Tax passed in the next year I'm all for it.


97 posted on 08/15/2005 9:56:08 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: blue_nova

They ought to eliminate paper money over $1. Just imagine, bank robbers trying tp haul out $30,000 in ones. It would also have the side benefit of making the "would you like fries with that" crowd learn how to count out change.


98 posted on 08/15/2005 9:58:08 AM PDT by P8riot (Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse; pigdog

I think we can all agree we want the 16th amendment repealed. We should demand that on Tuesday the Fair Tax is passed and on Wednesday the 16th amendment repeal is passed.


99 posted on 08/15/2005 10:00:20 AM PDT by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

Thanks, FRiend.

I have to admit that I really don't understand the knee-jerk opposition to the Fair Tax. It seems to me to be a win-win for everyone; except for the mega rich, and they hate ANY taxation on principle (why should MY tax dollars support the schools/roads/services for the great unwashed?)

I KNOW why the professional political class doesn't like it: it would take away their power to buy votes and set one class against another at election time.


100 posted on 08/15/2005 10:05:56 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 541-560 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson