Skip to comments.
Zero Tolerance Makes Zero Sense [VA and RI Parents get jail time for allowing underage drinking]
Washington Post ^
| Aug 9, 2005
| Radley Balko, CATO INSTITUTE
Posted on 08/12/2005 12:12:55 PM PDT by summer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: summer
I wonder if the author also supports underage sex-fests? It's obvious that morality is a taboo subject among the "elite thinkers" these days; they hate abstinence of any kind and only back the parents that make immoral decisions, while wresting all control from parents that want a say in things their children might be doing, like abortions for example.
41
posted on
08/12/2005 12:51:01 PM PDT
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: Al Gator
As did mine. All our parents were in league. I couldn't go anyones house that they didn't ask me if I'd had a few.
To lie was out of the question. It was better and easier to tell the truth.
With my dad, telling the truth was not only better and easier, it was also a good way to maintain good health and possession of your dental work.
42
posted on
08/12/2005 12:51:10 PM PDT
by
FMBass
(“Now that I’m sober I watch a lot of news” – Garofalo: From “Treason” by Coulter)
To: summer
Proms are the most overrated BS part of HS anyway. A waste of time and money with people who, with any luck, you'll never see again.
And what kind of testoserone deprived wimpoid wants to go to a party with adult suprevision? Unless of course you go back every week after that and demand they buy you another 30 pack.
43
posted on
08/12/2005 12:52:22 PM PDT
by
metesky
(This land was your land, this land is MY land; I bought the rights from a town selectman!)
To: flashbunny
Minors should be taught how to responsibly drink, not be kept from some forbidden fruit they think will make them cool and popular.
Yeah, I agree -- but, that is the obligation of the individual parent with their OWN kids. Not with others' kids. If you want to teach your kid how to drink at home, while having a meal, during a holiday celebration or something like that, that's your business. And I think that's fine. That's what all parents should do with THEIR OWN kids. Some kids find out at an early age they don't like drinking alcohol. And, they find that out at home with their own parents, not at someone else's home with someone else's parents.
44
posted on
08/12/2005 12:52:40 PM PDT
by
summer
To: trubluolyguy
RE your post #26 - Now, THERE's a good question...
45
posted on
08/12/2005 12:53:37 PM PDT
by
summer
To: summer
Agreed - but if the parents got together - all of them - and made that choice that alcohol would be allowed while supervised - then the state should not be involved in it.
46
posted on
08/12/2005 12:53:44 PM PDT
by
flashbunny
(Always remember to bring a towel!)
To: summer
Great message these parents are sending their kids, and other people's kids: You can't possibly have fun without drinking alcohol. The casual, unthinking acceptance of alcohol in our society is really scary. Statistically, 10% of these kids will go on to have serious problems with alcohol, but nobody seems to think's that a reason not to promote drinking as a normal healthy part of life. My children will never get that message from me, and they'll never see an adult drinking alcohol in their home, so they won't equate drinking alcohol with being "grown up".
To: Moose4
I'm worried about police being able to force entry into the houses just because of suspicion of underage drinking. If facilitating underage drinking is per se criminal, then why not advocate asset (house) forfeiture? That would be a HUGE deterrent.
48
posted on
08/12/2005 12:56:37 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: dawn53
The fact that the parents are breaking the law by serving alcohol to minors should be cause enough to land them in jail, IMHO. Why no take their house as well? It's a strong deterrent.
49
posted on
08/12/2005 12:57:56 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: flashbunny
No, I disagree. I still think what happens in your OWN home with your OWN kids is different than throwing a party for everyone else's kids. And, I think another poster was right - these parents are in essence saying to kids, it's impossible to have a good time without a drink. NOT a good message to send kids.
50
posted on
08/12/2005 12:58:13 PM PDT
by
summer
To: metesky
RE your post #43 - LOL...
51
posted on
08/12/2005 12:59:32 PM PDT
by
summer
To: summer
Back in the day I thought it was a good idea but now that I have a kid I see it differently. I don't want to see her screw up her life by having sex too early or getting knocked up. I know what happens when kids and booze mix. Hell, adults don't do such a good job either I find.
To: summer
So even if every parent agrees, and go along with it- the all knowing state can override their judgement and say a crime has been committed?
Apparently you trust the state to run children's lives better than responsible parents.
53
posted on
08/12/2005 1:01:12 PM PDT
by
flashbunny
(Always remember to bring a towel!)
To: trubluolyguy
What the HELL ever happened to parent being parents and NOT trying to be their KIDS' FRIENDS? And exactly how do you choose which laws to tell your child it's okay to break (or that you will help them break)?
54
posted on
08/12/2005 1:01:27 PM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: dakine
My mother chaired Project Graduation for my sister's class (1991, I think). The kids were locked in the gym, and had excellent games and kick-ass door prizes.
Did y'all get to roam the school, or were you confined to a smaller area? I've always thought it'd be way fun to be locked in the whole school overnight. You could play the biggest game EVER of hide-and-seek.
55
posted on
08/12/2005 1:02:12 PM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(Lord, I apologize . . . and be with the starving pygmies in New Guinea amen.)
To: summer
This is not a new pnenomenon . It is as old as alcohol itself. Some parents ween their offspring on booze,so we should not be surprised at a parent sponsored prom party. These parents seem to be smply replicating an experience they had at that age.
Not a good idea, particularly since it is against the law and it sends the wrong message to thousands of very impressionable youngsters.
I don't believe a 16 year is mature enough to handle the chemical changes which take place through drinking.
56
posted on
08/12/2005 1:02:45 PM PDT
by
jos65
To: atomicpossum
And exactly how do you choose which laws to tell your child it's okay to break That's based on the nature of the laws passed. Do you choose, a priori, that "if it's law, it must be good?"
57
posted on
08/12/2005 1:04:18 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Xenalyte
Hide and seek for HS graduation? Maybe for those on the short bus, but the rest of the dull normals are all trying to get laid.
58
posted on
08/12/2005 1:04:47 PM PDT
by
metesky
(This land was your land, this land is MY land; I bought the rights from a town selectman!)
To: FreeRadical
Oh, so cracking down on underage drinking is yet another example of big government cracking down on civil liberties?
Get a grip, bud.
To: flashbunny
Minors should be taught how to responsibly drink, not be kept from some forbidden fruit they think will make them cool and popular.
I agree with you. Most of the alcohol poisonings on college campuses every September are from kids who had never been exposed to alcohol before they were free from their parents. I drank in high school behind my parents back, but I think they knew what I was doing. But I never drove anywhere while drinking and I always spent the night where I was drinking.
Some Freepers act like they started life at 27 or something. Jeez.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson