Posted on 07/30/2005 2:00:35 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
Sounds like those bureaucrats at Census don't write nearly as well as those at the first constitutional convention.
True. But considering the editing skills I used on my post, I'm glad it was you to mention it, and not me... ;)
I am not impressed with the quality of the planning that comes out of any level of our gov'ts. IMHO they don't know what they are doing, and what they have done so far is a joke. That they want to know every bit of data about what we have, where we are, and what we watch on TV serves some purpose, commerce, probably, but it doesn't give a clue about what we could be if they didn't restrict us so harshly in the area of land ownership, subsurface rights, etc. We are not even allowed to own land in outer space. Unreal.
I mkae a lot of typos myself. And that is after proofreading.
No different from a policeman asking for your papers. This is just a group of policemen nicely asking for lots of your papers. If they don't know your race, they won't know who the usual suspects are supposed to be.
This has been going on for about 200 years or so. There are some histories of the census on the net. The government needs (wants, would like, hopes, is afraid) to know how many people are in an ares in order to allocate resources such as fire, police, hospitals, schools, welfare offices, BATF agents, EPA offices, etc. Demographics change more often than every ten years.
The US Constitution requires an enumeration every 10 years. This idea that you must provide a f*****g .gov drone whatever he/she/it demands is absolute and unadulterated BS, as isn't 'required' by law as they claim. All they are entitled to is how many people are extant in the USA. They are not entitled to know how much you pay for a given commodity, nor are they authorized by the US Constitution (the only law that matters!!!) to ask how much fiat money you are given by your employer in an off-year census questionaire.
I'll defend this nation with the very last drop of blood in my veins. But this government? Let it defend itself. It has violated in nearly every way the very document that brought it into existance.
You could always mail it back one page at a time for 24 weeks. If they call to complain, just adopt a seasoned-citizen tone of voice and say, "I'M A VERY BUSY MAN!"
Don't worry- he's personally too busy going around the country designating locations for community centers.
We've decided, Resident will fill it out. It was addressed to him, we can't legally open his mail.
NO WAY I would fill that thing out.
Let them come and arrest your address, then teach them how to write a coherent sentence.
OMG! You will surely be sent to the government's secret torture facility. You will NEVER see your loved ones again. Gitmo is Disneyland compared to where YOU will be sent.
Prayers for you and your family.
There are other opinions. There was such an outcry at the proposed Constitution that they were forced to modify some of it, and add the Bill of Rights, especially the Second Amend, even before it was adopted. Even with that, there is latitude for the assumption of unlimited power. Patrick Henry was extremely torqued off about the whole deal and wondered why they were writing a new constitution in the first place.
I am afraid you don't understand that either. Our government has three coequal branches, Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary with a series of checks and balances to keep any one from becoming all powerful. Supreme Court Justices can be impeached by the Congress. Their rulings can be overturned by acts of Congress. The Executive can ignore them. The entire court can be eliminated by a constitutional amendment.
The idea that the court's rulings can't be overturned because they become precedent is a myth pushed by the left to keep their unconstitutional court rulings in place.
Mainly because I see that we are excluded from owning land in outer space, and I am in Alaska where only one percent of the land and none of the subsurface rights are in private hands. You have corporate ownership and gov't ownership for the 99%. Things sure have changed in the land of milk and honey since 200 years ago when they couldn't even give land away fast enough.
Under what circumstances? As to impeachment, that is limited to treason and criminal activity.
The bottom line is, the constitution was passed without some of the opposing views by the 56 representatives. I guess some weren't persuasive in their arguments to make a different constitution. Whether or not someone didn't like it at that time, isn't relevant today. The Constitution is our country's law. If it's not spelt out in the constitution, it's up for grabs as a state issue. Something totally lacking at the federal level today. They weren't very persuasive in their arguments back then to convince them the 2nd Amendment was a bad idea. I think it's a fabulous idea. It's one right we have to overthrow oppressive governments. Our framers saw what happened to them in England. Many countries are going through it today. FMCDH.
And that's why when my STATE shows up with a STATE Trooper and a STATE court order directing my compliance, I might consider filling it out -- since my STATE does determine such things as where roads and schools get built (not the Federal government).
Of course my state hasn't quite slid that far off the deep end yet, but the Massachusetts annexation continues unabated so who knows...
Why did the feds usurp Alaska's state property rights? Maybe this all happened before Alaska was a state. I'm not familar with that part of your history. But, the feds shouldn't be in the land owning business. A parcel here and there for parks is one thing. Owning 99% of a state is a whole different issue. What are you all doing about it?
Question 13-C: "How well does this person speak English?"
My response- better than you can write it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.