Posted on 07/30/2005 5:55:36 AM PDT by Uncledave
I'm an agnostic, but I will not shrink from the logical consequences of rejecting religion.
The Gipper was staunchly pro-life. Is Rudy pro-life?
I'll point out for the record what you already well know my dear: the Gipper gameplan succeeded because of CONTENT, not strategy. A pro-abortion, anti-gun Ronald Reagan would have failed, and barely been noticed by history at all.
The red states are not going to vote for Hillery except Florida or Ohio. It is this simple the democrats are going to put her up she will win one of those states and all the blue states thus she wins. Even if she won florida which is a very good possibility Rudy will win New York which will offset the florida loss he will also Carry Pa which will upset the numbers even more. The democrats have done the math.
"Wow my posts have no hate at all they are realistic and of course you can't see past the blinder of yout irrationality to see that your belief system has been marginalized and that if you base your politics on your religious conveictions you are going to lose it is that simple. You will make the republican party losers because you can't shut your mouth for one election cycle "
Did you graduate from high school? Your reading comprehension isn't very good....I said in my last post that I'm not religious. Of course, I didn't expect you to read my post and understand it's implications because I know you're a knuckle dragging idiot.
You say your posts have no hate at all, yet in the link below you compare the "Religious right" to the taliban.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1453719/posts?page=122#122
You keep repeating your points "if you would just shut up for one election cycle"......it also shows you're opposed to the first amendment.
You really are stupid! I encounter a lot of idiots on this site but as of late, you take the cake.
"Rudy is a guy who focuses on the big issues of daily life, the main one being security. This is what we need for now and the forseeable future. Many may disagree on some of his "social" positions, but they really aren't that important in the scope of what a President is charged to do."
Amen. It astounds me that when we're facing the greatest threat in the history of our nation, so many people won't even consider the one guy who we know will take it to the bastards and never back down no matter what the left wing throws at him.
-ccm
I see the reality of the situation we live in an increasingly non-religious society if we want to salvage the religious values we have to do what democrats are really good at and reframe the debate. We can't use religion as the frame any longer it doesn't fly any longer.
It's an asinine quote. I won't dignify it with a response.
That'll be enough name calling, please.
"You can stick to pure conservative candidates and lose the next election allowing the Democrats to regroup and survive or crush them in this country and force them into several smaller parties."
Guess which one they'll choose.
It flies where I live.
Yes thats a great quote from me. If the religious right wants to start annoucing religious litmus tests for Republican candidates then the Republicans are lost and we might as well let the democrats run the country.
Name calling? Like calling the American religious right the "Taliban?
yeah it is.....
The left will love Rudy.
"Name calling? Like calling the American religious right the "Taliban?"
Exactly. Only an DUmmie would make a comparison like that, that *is* a leftist talking point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.