Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kansas radiator plant closing (More jobs lost to NAFTA)
The Centre Daily Times ^ | Mon, Jul. 25, 2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/26/2005 11:37:26 AM PDT by Willie Green

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: WHBates
The question is why he thought this to begin with? He was an insider on the outside. So much for a big brain.

A lot of people thought Y2K would be a huge mess. He wasn't the only one. He was the only one who could boost the money supply.

61 posted on 07/27/2005 10:10:04 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I'm sorry but that is BS. Nobody that worked in computers thought that there would be a huge mess (small problems, yes). He had to know this or his analyst needs to be fired. Sorry but that is a fact and everyone in the industry understood it.
62 posted on 07/27/2005 10:19:07 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: WHBates
I'm sorry but that is BS. Nobody that worked in computers thought that there would be a huge mess (small problems, yes).

Nobody thought there would be a problem? So what was all the billions and billions spent to fight the problem?

63 posted on 07/27/2005 10:24:39 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
"Nobody thought there would be a problem? So what was all the billions and billions spent to fight the problem?

Lots of folks made lots of money on the entire situation. In fact...... well never mind. There were lots of issues involved but bottom line is that it was a CYA issue that the FED covered and made vendors lots of money instead of costing them lots of money. LOL
64 posted on 07/27/2005 10:34:56 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: WHBates
Lots of folks made lots of money on the entire situation.

Lot's of money for no problem? Hmmmmm.

65 posted on 07/27/2005 10:40:36 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
"Lot's of money for no problem? Hmmmmm."

I'll bet the cost difference between the Y2K studies (great money) to actual problems found/resolved was big. Do you know the actual statistics?
66 posted on 07/27/2005 10:58:17 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: WHBates
" You really don't know what your talking about. LOL But I'm sure you think you do."

The process I described is exactly how I got my current job.
67 posted on 07/28/2005 7:04:18 AM PDT by Moral Hazard ("I believe the children are the future" - Whitney Houston; "Fight the future" - X-files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Are you trying to imply that the Fed uses the Discount Window as the primary means to adjust the money supply? That's not true today, and it especially wasn't true in 1999/2000.


68 posted on 07/28/2005 7:48:03 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Are you trying to imply that the Fed uses the Discount Window as the primary means to adjust the money supply?

No. The Fed adjusts the money supply by adjusting bank reserves.

The Federal Reserve uses open-market operations to either increase or decrease reserves. To increase reserves, the Federal Reserve buys U.S. Treasury securities by writing a check drawn on itself.

69 posted on 07/28/2005 7:55:09 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Well, we agree on that, but it takes us right back to where we were. The amount of reserves relative to the reserve requirement determines the funds rate. Banks with a bit more than the requirement will loan the excess and banks with a little less than the requirement will borrow.

The Fed can change the reserve requirement to influence the money supply but that's rarely done. Japan's central bank did that recently, but their funds rate was near zero.

70 posted on 07/28/2005 9:56:37 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson