[CHARLITE]

If the only thing they can find "wrong" with John G. Roberts, Jr. is the "nostalgic" style of his children's clothing, then Judge Roberts should be approved by acclamation tomorrow morning.

I thought the two children looked adorable!....but the Post's critic, Robin Givhan, used a buzz word - "NOSTALGIC" - by which she hoped to conjure up "reactionary," "old fashioned," "retrogressive" (as in "turn back the clock of social progress"), and maybe "repressive" or "oppressive" by association. Again I say, how tacky can a would-be journalist be?

[HereInTheHeartland]

"Post fashion writer Robin Givhan complained about “the nostalgic costuming of the children”

Another example of someone who hates traditional family oriented values.
These people want to destroy our culture and replace it with a socialistic, homosexual, co-habitating, etc. culture.

[Liberty Valance]

Good Grief!
This was at the WHITE HOUSE!
The BUSH White House
http://www.evilconservativeblog.com/files/whitehouse.htm

[Jagman]

I think going for the juggler is entirely appropriate for children...

[AD from SpringBay]

It must have stunned the Post to discover some people dress their children to look like children and not like the latest iterations of MTV's mook and slut.

[timestax]

POSTSCUM

[MarkL]

Maybe it was the lack of facial piercings and tatoos, as well as the little girl not wearing a halter top or belly tee with the words "Hottie" or "Porn Star" on it is what makes them oh so "last week!"

Mark

[EDINVA]

why, that little girl is already four years old and she wasn't showing her navel! Bet she doesn't even have a piercing or tattoo. Clearly reactionary!

[k2blader]

Who made the kids into a spectacle in the first place?