Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andrew Sullivan: Money bleeds Hollywood of its movie magic
The Sunday Times ^ | July 24, 2005 | Andrew Sullivan

Posted on 07/23/2005 4:31:17 PM PDT by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last
To: Chewbacca

"The problem with Hollywood is the worthless Writer's Guild union is so full of idiots that do not have any creative imagination in their heads they have to constantly ruin older and better films with a newer version that isn't worth the trip to the theater to see."

This 20-plus-year Writers Guild union member might suggest that your assessment is a mite harsh. Writers have never driven the business. I am one of thousands of produced writers who have taken time off from paying gigs and written new, original scripts that were met with, "Wonderful! But no one will ever make it" (too different, off-center, "controversial," etc.).

I am not speaking of the great wide public that stands back and hurls invective at everything Hollywood without really considering how the business works. I am speaking of professional writers in the industry. They know how to do a producable script. But subject matter, or approach, or whatever aced out that original. The lack of "creative imagination" you mention should probably be tempered with that in mind.

As for their tendency to "constantly ruin older and better films with a newer version that isn't worth the trip to the theater to see" (syntax notwithstanding): They neither "ruin" nor "improve." They get hired to jump onboard a train that has already left the station--studio, and likely producer, director and even a star or two are already on board. By then, the writer is just a high-paid typist. Rhetorical: Why would any of the men and women who turn out the above-mentioned "original" scripts choose to work on something that, usually, was already done better 20, 30, 40 or 50 years ago?


81 posted on 07/24/2005 3:46:52 PM PDT by John Robertson (JohnRobertson supports John Roberts wholeheartedly! (how could he not?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
the acting rarely gets beyond movie-of-the-week quality.

The answer in a nutshell. Superannuated adolescents are incapable of doing a convincing job of acting in adult roles. If actors were judged by developmental age, none of them would be allowed to work without their parents' consent.

82 posted on 07/24/2005 4:06:02 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
That sounds like it might make sense, but can you lead us to a reliable source for the figures?

Sorry.

83 posted on 07/24/2005 4:10:48 PM PDT by aculeus (Ceci n'est pas une tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson