Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stalin's Palace Still Glares at Warsaw
BBC ^ | 22 July 2005 | Staff

Posted on 07/22/2005 3:59:27 AM PDT by Our_Man_In_Gough_Island

Warsaw's Stalin-era skyscraper, the Palace of Culture and Science, is 50 years old on Friday. But the gift from Josef Stalin to then communist Poland is also one of the country's most controversial buildings, the BBC's Adam Easton reports.

It was a gift that nobody wanted. For decades it was hated because it was the symbol of Soviet domination of the country.

It was designed by Russian architect Lev Rudniev in classic socialist realist style. Inside, it is full of marble and ornate chandeliers, but outside its stone-clad walls are home to dozens of statues of muscle-bound worker heroes with chiselled cheekbones clutching enormous hammers.

It is certainly not to everyone's taste.

"The Palace of Culture is not handsome. It's very ugly," says Warsaw's chief architect Michal Borowski, who has his office in the building.

"But it is here and it's a part of our city. You could ask is Warsaw a nice city? No, Warsaw is not a very nice city. But it is an interesting city."

Concert greats

In 1952, Russian workers were brought in to build the palace. There were so many, Polish workers had to build a makeshift "friendship" settlement of wooden cottages to house them.

We don't remember the communist times, it's only a building. Maybe it's a symbol of communism but we don't see it that way

Young Warsaw resident

A 3.3-hectare area of war-torn Warsaw was cleared to make way for the structure which contains 40 million bricks. It was completed in lightning speed and handed over to the people on 22 July, 1955.

Inside its 43 storeys there are 3,200 rooms. It was here the communists used to hold their party congresses. But it was also home to a swimming pool, a theatre, a museum and a 2,800-seat concert hall.

Over the years, stars like Marlene Dietrich, Ella Fitzgerald and a youthful Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones performed there.

Despite the recent addition of modern skyscrapers nearby, it still dominates the city skyline. Its outline can be seen from 15km (nine miles) away.

WARSAW'S CULTURE PALACE

Opened: 22 July 1955 Height: 231 metres to spire tip Contains 40 million bricks Took three years to complete 3,288 rooms on 43 floors 16 Russians died during construction

When communism collapsed in 1989, many Varsovians thought the palace should too. That is exactly what happened in the popular Polish film Rozmowy kontrolowane (Controlled Conversations) when the main character pulled the flush of a toilet in the palace.

But attitudes have softened in the last 15 years. The political symbolism has faded. Most of the city's inhabitants, like Michal Borowski, grew up with it.

"When I was very, very young I used to go there. I learnt to play table tennis; I learnt swimming, even dancing there. During Christmas holidays thousands of children used to go there and get small gifts like three oranges, which were rare at that time," Mr Borowski said.

Mr Borowski wants to develop the area around the palace and plans to construct a modern art museum, a music theatre, shops and apartment blocks.

Sentimental value

In fact, many of the capital's younger residents - too young to remember communism - actually like it.

"It's got some sentimental value for me because my university courses used to be here. It's got a certain style. I don't like walls of glass. It's a Warsaw landmark so I think it should stay," said one.

"I like it. The architecture is funny. You don't see this style anymore. We don't remember the communist times, it's only a building. Maybe it's a symbol of communism but we don't see it that way," said another.

"I think it now has a position similar to the Eiffel Tower in Paris. It's a part of the city and it should stay. It reminds me of the Empire State Building. So, if it's used in New York, why not Warsaw?" said another woman.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: architecture; poland; skyscraper; warsaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: dfwgator

Actually many of these buildings were bult by German POW's.


46 posted on 07/25/2005 1:53:11 AM PDT by K. Smirnov (Do not let the sands of time get into your lunch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Our_Man_In_Gough_Island
Boston has it's own ugly skyscrapers that would have been more at home in Moscow at the time they were built...


47 posted on 07/25/2005 2:20:52 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Need a Waffle House in Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
In fact, up until recently we had very few of those in Moscow. (mainly Le Corbusier's). So, please do not get confused.

The so-called "Stalin skyscrapers" are way nicer than those plain square-on-top-of-rectangle buildings you posted. You may dislike the ideology that produced these wedding-cake buildings, but they do look nice. Well, they do look nice if you watch them in reality vs. on some blurry JPEG size of a matchbox.

I can understand Poles disliking the building, AFAIK from visiting Poland, their old-town architecture is totally different. And if this building reminds them of Stalin, well that is their right to dislike it.

Personally I would be very much against demolishing those "Stalin skyscrapers" in Moscow. They are beautiful, especially at the summertime, early in the morning.

This is Moscow State University.


48 posted on 07/25/2005 7:21:01 AM PDT by K. Smirnov (Do not let the sands of time get into your lunch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: K. Smirnov
Well I must say that the buildings look much more impressive in your pictures. I would like to see more building of that type in America. Unfortunately, no corporation would pay that much extra to erect buildings with such fine detail. That's why we have all those cookie-cutter boxes going up. Got to keep costs down and keep those shareholders happy!

There are some stunning skyscrapers over here. The Chrysler Building and the Empire State Building to name a couple. But they just don't build them like that anymore.

49 posted on 07/25/2005 1:17:57 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Need a Waffle House in Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson