Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Congress mulls press shield law as reporter wallows in jail
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 7/20/05 | AFP - Washington

Posted on 07/20/2005 9:54:44 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Judith Miller is wallowing?

pigs wallow..


Judith Miller of the New York Times, seen here 06 July 2005, will mark two weeks of time served for refusing to divulge her source in a legal showdown which has mushroomed into a bona fide scandal, centering on White House political guru Karl Rove(AFP/File/Paul J. Richards)


Time Magazine journalist Matthew Cooper speaks during a hearing on reporters' shield legislation at the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC July 20, 2005. The Bush administration on July 20 opposed federal legislation to protect journalists from having to reveal confidential sources because it would create 'serious impediments' to law enforcement and fighting terrorism. Photo by Yuri Gripas/Reuters

Hey, Senator? Where's MY Subway sandwich?

1 posted on 07/20/2005 9:54:44 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Time magazine journalist Matthew Cooper speaks to the press 06 July 2005 after leaving court in Washington, DC. Cooper revealed that he first learned from top White House official Karl Rove that the wife of an ambassador who criticized the Bush administration worked at the CIA.(AFP/File/Mandel Ngan)

"Yes. It's all coming back to me now."


2 posted on 07/20/2005 9:57:42 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Senators? What, Barbara Boxer, John Kerry, Edward Kennedy? DOA legislation walking...


3 posted on 07/20/2005 9:58:19 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

4 posted on 07/20/2005 9:58:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Anti-leak legislation?

Is Leaky leahy co-sponsoring it?


5 posted on 07/20/2005 10:01:09 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Something notably missing in this, that we got so used to in the 90's.

How many times has this White House claimed "Executive Privilege" in this, or any other "scandal".

Bubba and the Beast tied up every request for months.


6 posted on 07/20/2005 10:03:58 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It would be an outrage to put reporters - who as a class have been outrageously irresponsible over the past 70 years as I personally can document, and likely since the institution of the profession - above the law. Media is not the fourth branch of government; it would be suicidal for the GOP to grant, de facto, this status.
7 posted on 07/20/2005 10:04:31 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Abortion kills liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
She is expected to serve at least until the mandate of the grand jury expires in October, and supporters fear expanded criminal contempt proceedings could follow.

The court is not fooling around. They're saying if she doesn't spill the beans, her contempt could go criminal. My bet is she'll talk.
Leaking Plame wasn't a crime, so there's really something going on I'd love to know about. Darn! What crime are they tracking? ARG!

I don't think a bill to save reporters if they've committed a crime or they're covering up a crime will pass. That would make them above the laws the rest of us have to follow.

8 posted on 07/20/2005 10:05:37 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

What if she is not protecting a government source?

What if she is protecting another member of the media?


9 posted on 07/20/2005 10:05:38 PM PDT by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

It's someone the Rats and the MSM really, really don't want known.

The suspense is killing me!


10 posted on 07/20/2005 10:08:20 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: digger48
It's someone the Rats and the MSM really, really don't want known.

Yeah. They're protecting her. If it were about Rove, they'd be screaming "Off with her head!"

11 posted on 07/20/2005 10:11:59 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

---"The food has not agreed with her and we have been trying to impress on her that she needs to eat. We have been hammering that in."---

Is it true her lawyers are trying to get her transferred to Gitmo? :^)


12 posted on 07/20/2005 10:13:42 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
---"The food has not agreed with her and we have been trying to impress on her that she needs to eat. We have been hammering that in."---

Knowing you're going to be a target of the Arkansas Chinese Mafia when you get out can be a pretty upsetting thing.

13 posted on 07/20/2005 10:16:08 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
What if she is protecting another member of the media?

That's the secret she is protecting. I have heard the tv boobs use the phrase, "Some people are saying..." and I believe it is to cover what is conversational in the break room at the station. They try to make it sound as if they have had real clandestine interviews with shadowy informants instead of Chet the weather guy.

14 posted on 07/20/2005 10:17:43 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

LOL..

It sounds pretty good.

I hear a bunch of leftie hollywood stars and food connoisseurs are trying to get reservations there as well. ;-)


15 posted on 07/20/2005 10:17:45 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I've got a lot to say about reporters - who claim some sacred shield-right holding them above and beyond the rest of us - and most of it centers on variations of where they can go and what they can kiss on the long road there.
16 posted on 07/20/2005 10:20:55 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Every evil which liberals imagine Judaism and Christianity to be, islam is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I am against this until we are sure that we understand what happened here. The possibility exists that a rogue unit in the CIA decided to conduct its very own foreign policy that was at odds with that of the elected government. In doing this, they appear to have leaked substantial quantities of classified information to reporters.

The leaks continue; today Walter Pincus of the Washington Post tells us about the contents of a classified State Department memo.

If we have rogue elements in the CIA, they are a threat to our ability to govern ourselves. They need to be exposed, not further hidden.


17 posted on 07/20/2005 10:24:16 PM PDT by Nick Danger (www.iranfree.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Who is Judith Miller covering up for? That's the question.


18 posted on 07/20/2005 10:24:40 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Who is Judith Miller covering up for? That's the question.

Maybe she's covering up for herself. She's the leak.


19 posted on 07/20/2005 10:31:39 PM PDT by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
According to Mary Madalin(?) today on FOX, the WH didn't know who Wilson was, who sent him, why he went there, and why he reported his findings to the press.

Remember, the uranium mines in Africa are controlled by the U.N., France, and Germany - all anti-Bush, just like Wilson.
My guess is he didn't go there to find information. Wilson went there to deliver information.

20 posted on 07/20/2005 10:32:51 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson