Posted on 07/20/2005 9:13:07 AM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
Of course he is. You see, FReeper friendly is a reknowned biologist with thousands of peer-reviewed articles.
friendly has extensively investigated each of the 400 scientists in question and is so vastly superior in scientific knowledge that friendly can easily label them incompetent.
friendly is no idiot, insulting people just because friendly disagrees with them. That would be moronic.
Lovely day...someone from my Alma Mater is on that list.
Darwinian Evolution is deficient. It fails to explain those that live among us, look very similar to us, but have not developed the same rational thought processes. They call themselves Democrats.
(From the ritual account given by the Pawnee Indian,
Four Rings, to Dr. Melvin Gilmore.)
Mother Corn caused movement. She gave life.
Life being given we moved towards the surface:
We shall stand erect as men!
The being is become human! He is a person!
To personal form is added strength:
Form and intelligence united, we are ready to corn forth
But Mother Corn warns us that the Earth is still in flood.
Now Mother Corn proclaims that the flood is gone, and the Earth--now green.
Mother Corn commands that the people ascend to the surface.
Mother Corn has gathered them together, they move half way to the surface;
Mother Corn leads them near to the surface of the Earth;
Mother Corn brings them to the surface. The first light appears!
Mother Corn leads them forth. They have emerged to the waist.
They step forth to the surface of the Earth.
Now all have come forth; and Mother Corn leads them from the East towards the West.
Mother Corn leads them to the place of their habitation. . . .
All is completed All is perfect!
H.B. Alexander, The World's Rim
Do you still have the link to the NCSE resource that shows the mischaracterization of the question posed to these scientists?
Alas, rack of rationality is no barrier to breeding, which is all that is required to be "fit."
Indeed, it may be the opposite.
But if they agree with you, they wouldn't be incompetent, would they?
Evolutionists, on the other hand, have a list of ~54,000.IOW, the 400 creationist scientists are a mere .74% of the total set of scientists (~ 54,400)?
400, WOW!!
A few million more and that will be a significant number.
Oh goodie. I guess this means we can expect to start seeing the peer-reviewed academic theses covering the empirical, physical, experimental and predictive details of ID any day now that the Theory of Evolution has been formally dismissed. I await them eagerly!
Seventy biologists down, several hundred thousand to go.
So it's all a numbers game. When enough scientists are brave enough to come over to the other side, then the debate will heat up.
"IOW, the 400 creationist scientists are a mere ...."
Well 3 times I went through that article and didn't see any reference to creationist "scientists" Can you please point that out, my eyes must be failing me today?
This thread and announcement is about numbers.
However, there are people on this very site that would believe this crap.
will read later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.