Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drinking age still debated
JS Online ^ | July 17, 2005 | RAQUEL RUTLEDGE

Posted on 07/18/2005 10:19:10 AM PDT by Last Dakotan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: MeanWestTexan

That solution would be completely and utterly worthless, and it ignores reality.

The reality is, that kids do drink, and while it causes some trouble on it's own, it causes even more because it's illegal.

Kids that are kicking ass at school arn't going to be the ones with the problems, and the other ones will drink anyway.


61 posted on 07/18/2005 12:29:52 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: bummerdude
Boycott Chevron-Texaco, buy Exxon-Mobil !

Why?
62 posted on 07/18/2005 12:31:46 PM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1365615/posts


63 posted on 07/18/2005 12:33:22 PM PDT by bummerdude (Boycott Chevron-Texaco, buy Exxon-Mobil !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bummerdude

I see. I boycott all companies with hyphenated names. Pick one name and be done with it.


64 posted on 07/18/2005 12:39:03 PM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan

I saw Abbie Hoffman (Steal This Book) speak at my college years ago and even though he was a liberal, he spoke an awful lot of sense on some topics. He said that if people from 18 to 21 didn't become informed and start voting, they were going to lose the right. He said that it was obvious that they didn't vote because if they did, they'd be able to drink.

Just as an aside, he also said that you should always try to get your news from multiple sources so that you get the true story.


65 posted on 07/18/2005 12:44:15 PM PDT by Family Guy (I disagree with what you said, but I'll defend to the death your right to shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
The 21 drinking age mandate killed a number of Good Ideas at the state level. Several midwestern states had lower legal ages for beer and wine versus spirits, or lower ages for their own residents (to address the blood border problem).

Having differential ages made sense, but ran up against expanding federalism. I recall that Wisconsin had a different drinking age for its own residents for a few months, until some FIB of an Illinoisian challenged it in the courts under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Reagan was from California, which has always had a very puritanical cultural attitude about alcohol.

66 posted on 07/18/2005 12:46:50 PM PDT by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan

Feds have no rights in anyones business unless I need my boots polished and my butt wiped.


67 posted on 07/18/2005 12:48:47 PM PDT by Porterville (Don't make me go Bushi on your a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
12th-graders who reported consuming alcohol in the last 30 days dropped to 48% in 2004 from 66% in 1985

Slackers.....

68 posted on 07/18/2005 12:50:07 PM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HolgerDansk
Reagan was from California, which has always had a very puritanical cultural attitude about alcohol.

I was stationed both in Illinois and in California back in the mid-70's. In Illinois, one could buy beer and wine at 19 years old. You had to be 21 in California to drink anything. I agree with you that about states back then who had different drinking ages for beer and wine versus spirits, it made good sense.

rochester_veteran
69 posted on 07/18/2005 12:59:50 PM PDT by rochester_veteran (born and raised in rachacha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

"In many states, Texas included, a parent or legal guardian can legally supply alcohol to their own minor child, including at restaurants. (I believe this also works for spouses.)"

In other states that is considered child abuse and endangering the welfare of a minor.


70 posted on 07/18/2005 1:31:41 PM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Family Guy

No suprise Hoffman had some good ideas.

Classic Liberals are what we call "conservatives" today.


71 posted on 07/18/2005 1:39:38 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran
I agree with you that about states back then who had different drinking ages for beer and wine versus spirits, it made good sense.

That was one of the ideas of federalism. Different states coud try different things.

72 posted on 07/18/2005 2:26:11 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Classic Liberals are what we call "conservatives" today.

That makes sense. It reminds me of something Zel Miller said (paraphrasing), "I didn't leave the Democratic party. They left me."

73 posted on 07/19/2005 10:46:10 AM PDT by Family Guy (I disagree with what you said, but I'll defend to the death your right to shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson