Posted on 07/17/2005 12:05:52 PM PDT by Graybeard58
lol Sure. Have you discovered you were wrong in saying that the "guest workers" would have to apply for permanent residence from their home country yet? Or is that another fact youre choosing to ignore?
Swamp-Stick just pulls numbers out of thin air.
He constantly does that. Good job calling him out.
Regards
>"We have translators in hospitals, social services, police stations, schools etc. All required by law"<
Hey HT,
I appreciate your info. I look to you for the straight scoop! :)
Wasn't there a requirement that the HHS recently tried (unsuccessfully) to implement with hospitals, and doctors , requiring them to provide Hispanic translators, Espanol documents and etc?
I seem to recall reading something about that.
>"It's been an hour now since I posed the question to bayourod AGAIN. You have posted since I last asked you to provide documentation for your statement that 20% of Marines are hispanic."<
thanks HT.
I'm going to see if I can find that info.
An executive order? Good grief.
No way most doctors offices and hospitals can afford that.
Ridiculous.
Thanks for the info and link in #126. My next question to him, if he ever answered the first one was just how he defined hispanic. My dictionary defines it the same as you did - Spanish speaking of any nationality.
These people who are getting all worked up about the plight of the poor illegal aliens need to take a trip to the southwest U.S, and see the abject poverty of American Indians living on reservations. I recently returned from Arizona & New Mexico and I haven't seen that kind of poverty since rural Mississippi in the 60s.
Those are pretty impressive numbers and bear out what one sees on news out of Iraq. My guess would be that most of the "Hispanics" would be Mexicans.
And, to further clarify my position on this issue, my lifelong experience with working with and living with Mexican immigrants has been very positive.
That said, nothing justifies the absolute mess that constitutes our border and immigration agencies.
>"Those are pretty impressive numbers and bear out what one sees on news out of Iraq. My guess would be that most of the "Hispanics" would be Mexicans."<
- My guess would be, that most of the Hispanics in our military would be: *Americans.*
:^)
Regards
Delivery Room Translators Needed With Rise In Immigrant Births
Report Says Almost 1 In 4 U.S. Births Is To Foreign-Born Mother
POSTED: 6:42 am EDT July 18, 2005
UTICA, N.Y. -- The man from Bosnia was just not understanding. His wife was in labor at a central New York hospital and the doctor was trying to explain in English the need for a Caesarean section.
Horrified, the man translated incorrectly and told his wife the baby was dead, and it would have to be cut out of her. The woman went into shock. Though the baby was healthy, she couldn't take care of it for a week.
Almost one in four American births is now to a foreign-born mother, according to a recent report by the Center for Immigration Studies. The result, medical experts and advocates say, is a growing pressure on American health care centers to not only deliver babies, but deliver them in more languages than one.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 says hospitals that get federal money must provide interpreter services. It just doesn't say how. Most hospitals reach out with phone-based interpretation services. But critics say the phone has limitations, especially during childbirth.
"What, are they going to pass the receiver back and forth while the doctor is catching the baby?" asked Dr. Francesca Gany, director of the Center for Immigrant Health at the New York University School of Medicine. "Health care facilities are definitely feeling the heat."
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations is studying the link between medical error and interpretation issues, Gany said. And the National Health Law Program is looking at how small health care providers can offer language services. A report by the Washington-based Institute of Medicine said 56 percent of such providers surveyed had received no language training.
Though studies are underway, there are no national numbers for access to, or use of, interpreter services in health care. But there are some telling samples.
Cost is a barrier and most hospitals told the New Jersey survey that reimbursement for translation services is needed. A 2002 study by the National Association of Children's Hospitals found interpreting costs at 22 hospitals ranged from $1,800 to $847,000 per year.
http://www.local10.com/health/4734650/detail.html
>"My next question to him, if he ever answered the first one was just how he defined hispanic"<
I'm sure 'ol Swamp-Stick's view is that a Hispanic is exclusively of Mexican decent.
He's (by his own statements) in the resteraunt business.
Funny thing is, inspte of all his multi-cultural hoopla, Palillo Del Pantano (Swamp Stick, in Spanish) doesn't speak a word of Espanol...Not a lick. Zilch, nada, *cero*.
Isn't that odd?
Bookmarked
Thanks, HT
Small businesses will be hurt by such a program, as they currently pay illegals less than minimum wage. If they are legalized, labor costs will skyrocket.
No matter how many times you utter that nonsense, it doesn't change the fact that you are resorting to despicable liberal tactics in an attempt to slime good people.
The illegal status of the workers is what enables the business to pay sub-minimum wages. With the workers legalized, smaller businesses such as restaurants will definitely be affected negatively.
;^D
RE: >"So your laziness to understand another must be codified into law?"<
Usted me demando era perezoso, porque deseo Ingles como lengua oficial para este país. Bien, usted ha estado traduciendo estos postes, usted idiota multi-cultural del jihad?
Pero usted no habla una palabra del espanol, le hace, usted farsante!
;^D
Quite a few aren't.
But your point is acknowledged. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.