Skip to comments.
Rove Reportedly Held Phone Talk on C.I.A. Officer
NY Times ^
| July, 15, 2005
| DAVID JOHNSTON
Posted on 07/14/2005 8:27:58 PM PDT by freedrudge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-225 next last
To: Dems_R_Losers
No, its Miller. And she sourced this little bit of nonsense too.
61
posted on
07/14/2005 8:51:17 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Fledermaus
No, it means "we are making this crap up as we go along".Fake but accurate, right???
62
posted on
07/14/2005 8:51:40 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(If the WMD intelligence was so bad, why does Valerie Plame still have a job?)
To: freedrudge
ATTENTION WORLD!!!
I AM OFFICIALLY OUTING JETHRO BODINE!!!
SUPER SECRET DOUBLE OUGHT SPY!!!
63
posted on
07/14/2005 8:52:01 PM PDT
by
socal_parrot
(Tina Delgado is alive! ALIVE!)
To: Dems_R_Losers; All
It's Tenet. And he was fired. So guess what, folks, the President did keep his word, he did fire the real leaker.Anyone up to going over to the psych ward (DU) to sample the mood?
64
posted on
07/14/2005 8:52:12 PM PDT
by
CFC__VRWC
("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
To: All
...someone who has been officially briefed on the matter said Thursday. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now that's funny. I don't care who you are that's funny right there.
65
posted on
07/14/2005 8:52:16 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
To: HawaiianGecko
No, I saw no humor in that statement...just amazement the NY Times actually thinks that BS will sell!
66
posted on
07/14/2005 8:52:17 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Right now I can't decide which political party is trying to commit suicide faster.)
To: John Valentine
So, Novak was Roves's source, not the other way round! That's how I read it.
To: Pukin Dog
You really think Judy Miller talks to Bob Novak? I doubt it. He is a columnist for a rival paper. Why would she blab to him about her biggest source in the CIA?
68
posted on
07/14/2005 8:53:16 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(If the WMD intelligence was so bad, why does Valerie Plame still have a job?)
To: alnick
'How does Novak or the NYT get Rove being a source for Novak when Novak called Rove and told Rove about Plame? Because Rove said he'd heard the same rumor? '
"He LIED to US! He preyed on our FEARS!!"
69
posted on
07/14/2005 8:53:26 PM PDT
by
bitt
('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
To: Mo1
"In addition to focusing new attention on Mr. Rove and whether he can survive the political fallout, the revelation is sure to create new partisan pressure on Mr. Bush."
I see the language about the Supreme Court pick. But I'm stunned the NYT can spin this like it puts more pressure on Rove rather than vice versa. Pravda.
I expect we'll see all sorts of people were talking about Mrs. Wilson.
Also, I think these are leaks from the Rove camp that the desperate NYT tried to spin as harmful to Rove. I don't recall a NYT article that so strived to tell the readers how to think about the information reported.
70
posted on
07/14/2005 8:53:41 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: hole_n_one
I can't WAIT to hear Novak's response to this bullshit article.
71
posted on
07/14/2005 8:54:28 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(If the WMD intelligence was so bad, why does Valerie Plame still have a job?)
To: Carling
Maybe tomorrow we will see again on Drudge
NOT GUILTY NOT GUILTY NOT GUILTY
72
posted on
07/14/2005 8:54:29 PM PDT
by
freedrudge
(fan of drudge)
To: Carling
Nope. This article completely backs up what Rove said. He talked about someone who was not a covert agent when asked.
I'm puzzled by some of the posts on this thread. This article says one thing to me: Case closed.
73
posted on
07/14/2005 8:54:47 PM PDT
by
Dr.Hilarious
(If Al Qaeda took over the judiciary and mainstream media, would we know the difference?)
To: Dems_R_Losers
Oh, I guess they are now going to try to nail Rove for saying he never talked to Novak at all, but I don't recall him ever saying that.Doesn't matter. The Left doesn't care about what is actually said or the actual facts. For them it's about what they THINK was said and what they BELIEVE to be the facts. And, of course, they always know their lies are reality.
74
posted on
07/14/2005 8:55:03 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Right now I can't decide which political party is trying to commit suicide faster.)
To: hole_n_one
The Dummies are freaking over this article because they know this shows that Rove WASN'T the source. Rove didn't leak anything--he was approached by reporters. He wasn't shopping the info; the information was leaked to him.
This article shows why Rove isn't a target of the investigation. He didn't leak.
To: Shermy
I don't recall a NYT article that so strived to tell the readers how to think about the information reported. Ultimate desperation. There is a plaintive "Pleeeeeaaaaase? Just this once?" between the lines.
76
posted on
07/14/2005 8:56:13 PM PDT
by
JennysCool
(Be good, and you will be lonesome. - Mark Twain)
To: Dems_R_Losers
"Why would she blab to him about her biggest source in the CIA?"
Miller wasn't Novak's source. But she may have spoke to other reporters and officials. Why? To brag about her knowledge perhaps, or to serve a source wishing to get the information out.
77
posted on
07/14/2005 8:56:22 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Dems_R_Losers
78
posted on
07/14/2005 8:56:29 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Right now I can't decide which political party is trying to commit suicide faster.)
To: freedrudge
So, exactly why does this amount to "news fit to print." Novak testified to the grand jury long ago, and Rove's lawyer says he has been notified by the prosecutor that Rove is not a target of the investigation. And Novak called Rove, not the other way around. What does this add to where we were yesterday morning? Redundancy. Nothing more. How the NYT gets away with masquarading this as news mystifies me; and gets a whirling siren and giant RED headlines from Matt Drudge to pump it, to boot!
79
posted on
07/14/2005 8:56:31 PM PDT
by
n-tres-ted
(Remember November!)
To: Fledermaus
Exactly - it isn't the truth of the matter that counts, it's the seriousness of the accusations.
Somehow I thought the New York Times might hew to a higher standard, after the Dan Rather debacle. Silly me!
80
posted on
07/14/2005 8:56:42 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(If the WMD intelligence was so bad, why does Valerie Plame still have a job?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-225 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson