Posted on 07/12/2005 2:41:05 AM PDT by television is just wrong
Right, and there was no reason for the Congress to take testimony on this either.
You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?
if you want to believe that there are Soviet era nukes buried in yuor neighbours backyard, then go ahead. I saw a gallup poll that said 1/3 of americans believe in haunted houses.
I do not believe that there are Soviet nukes buried in the US and that Al Qaeda has the codes and that 1000s of Al Qaeda agents are in the US awaiting order to detonate those ancient nukes.
This will sound extreme, but it's not. Bush needs to have our farmers start poppy production. For the next few years we supply all the heroin to the world. We do it cheaper. An unintended consequence would be to pay off the national debt - undermine terrorists, and knock out funding for crime families.
You won't see a war in Iran. You will see a strike that eliminates Iran's nuke plant and possibly some critical parts of the fuel fabrication process. I don't think Israel has received the bunker busters we sold them yet.
Once those are staged. A bunch of Iran's facilities will go POOF soon after. Other than using our air and naval power to safeguard the Strait of Hormuz and eliminate any Iranian military asset that gets out of line., I think it's going to be a wham bam, eff you Iran.
If Iran wants to carry things further, it'll be death from above for their forces.
Guess they are discussing this tonight on Coast to Coast.
Looks like the loonies were coordinating their stories
Alex Jones? You're here?
Actually, I think you are wrong.
Every time the story comes out--there are incremental changes, additions--more detail; higher level of sources etc.
It's not the identical same story.
Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if they tried hard and succeeded at least partially in coordinating lots of mayhem around the globe at the same time they lite off nukes in the USA.
Being discussed on radio by George right now.
Why do you think this is "loonie"? You think a man with almost unlimited money can't buy nukes? You think a thousand pounds of something can't be smuggled into the US? ( By that reasoning we would not have a problem keeping marijuana out of the country. ) What do you have backing up your position?
But that would be too insensitive, too hostile, and would alienate the Islamopukes and give them a reason to hate us. After all, we are trying to be as sensitive and gentle as possible while we are fighting this war aren't we?
No I'm not comforted by it. What you should worry about is not that they already have a bomb here, but that they might bring one here. It's six of one, half dozen of the other as far as I am concerned, because either way we are dead.
RE: shelter at home.
My wife is at home. I work about 5 miles away.
You can't protect yourself 100%. You can do something, however. In our case, my wife is disabled; our plan is to shelter in place and then possibly move out when the danger has dropped. The shelter gives us that option.
I have followed these reports of Al Qaeda and the nukes for a few years now. They do take you to some really 'far-out' urls. I have always discounted most of the reports that tie into some conspiracy theory.
As of late, I followed up on one of these reports. What struck me with this particular one is the level of detail on seemingly inconsequential bits of information. That detail was not something that you would pick up on the internet. I personally know that those little facts are accurate. It added some verity to the source.
This could just be another yarn being spun with 1% fact and 99% imagination. It could even be deliberate dis-info. However, I watch the folks in the security business. A lot of folks seem awfully worried about something, and these are not folks at the political level.
In any case, for me, the latest report I found (not the one quoted here) added a stong piece of provenance to the idea of Al Qaeda and the nukes. I do think this should be taken seriously, but I certainly have not changed my lifestyle because of it.
It's a difficult problem. Rupublicans MUST be elected to the Presidence and the Congresional Majority, but the Mexican border MUST be secured. Bush has to walk a fine line, and he must succeed at both.
I think there will be a lot of hunkering down and moving out when perceived to be safer.
Personally, I believe that only sheltered under God's Almighty Arms is the only safety where that is obedient-to-His-instructions, voice in building and using a shelter or moving out at His Spirit's clear still-small-voice direction.
In any case, walking close to Him will be the only safety here and the only route to eternal life.
imho
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.