Purple Heart Recipient Needs Assistance - (inside IRS contact by Kerry targets SwiftBoat vet!)

US OBSERVER.COM ^ | JULY 11, 2005 | Edward Snook,Editor in Chief, US-Observer

[CHARLITE]

Help if you can.

Thanks

Char

[misty4jc]

OMG how awful!! I'll write for sure! That POS kerry...get over it LOSER.

[Echo Talon]

Sounds like Kerry should spend more time trying to get a message and less time trying to get revenge.

[bitt]

Lying traitor going after a Swiftie ping!

[nopardons]

Damn Kerry! Just WHO does he think he is...Clinton?

[Tribune7]

bump

[bitt]

E-mails to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, may be sent to

AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.

E-mails will be forwarded to the responsible Department of Justice component for appropriate handling. Before sending e-mail, please read our Privacy Policy for details about how we handle personal information.

If you know the specific organization or official you wish to contact, please indicate such in your message or check the Component Contact Information Page to contact them directly.

Please include your mailing address in the event that the Department replies via United States Postal Service.

[infidel29]

This is a very Clintonesque attack for sKerry, can't fight the truth, so attack in an underhanded way to discredit the enemy.

Why not just file libel and slander charges Kerry you jack-ass? Oh, because he was telling the truth? Or is it because a trial would make the offical records public domain?

[Fred Hayek]

Is Kevin Ryan a Clinton appointment?

[elfman2]

"According to a confidential source, “There is no question that Kerry contacted an IRS confidant of his to attempt to place Peck in an unfavorable light and therefore make himself more appealing in his political world.”

The following day a grand jury indictment was handed down on Peck and on March 25, 2004 CID agent Karen Fazio arrested him. According to a federal prosecutor, the direction to indict came straight from Washington and although there is no known evidence of wrongdoing or IRS audit conducted, the case is being pursued and Peck has been in limbo since that time with little or no success in obtaining the evidence that was used to indict him. He was told the case is circumstantial and evidently it is secret as well. "

This sounds too preposterous to be believed. My instincts tell me that there’s much more to this story if any of it is true.

[PistolPaknMama]

Kerry is lower than a dog turd on a shoe.

Bump so I can find this thread tomorrow.

[Ladysmith]

Bump for action.

[MindBender26]

This is the Anderson Ark Scam. Google for lots more info.

"The United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California and the IRS-Criminal Investigation Division announced that Edward R. Peck, of Prescott, Arizona, formerly of Santa Rosa, California was arrested yesterday following his recent indictment for alleged income tax violations. Mr. Peck was indicted March 16, 2004, by a federal grand jury in San Francisco for seven counts of making and subscribing to false returns or other documents in violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(1).

According to the indictment, Mr. Peck is alleged to have willfully and knowingly filed individual income tax returns for the years 1998, 1999, and 2000 claiming fictitious losses in the respective amounts of $550,501; $4,702; and $99,987 from an entity known as Surfwood Venture. Defendant Peck is also alleged to have falsely reported to the IRS that he had no interest in or signature or other authority over a financial account in a foreign country.

Also according to the indictment, Mr. Peck is alleged to have willfully and knowingly filed U. S. Partnership returns for the years 1998, 1999, and 2000 claiming fictitious losses in the respective amounts of $579,475; $4,950; and $105,250.

Finally, the indictment charges that Mr. Peck filed a false Application of Tentative Refund (Form 1045) for the calendar year 1998 with the IRS. This document, as is true of all tax returns, was signed under penalty of perjury and was false in that it claimed carryback net operating deductions of $225,809 for 1996 and $427,540 for 1997. Defendant Peck is alleged to have known that no net operating losses existed and that there were no decreases in his taxes for 1996 and 1997.

IT ALSO DOESN"T PASS THE SMELL TEST. KERRY LOST!

[MindBender26]

Sorry, but if you Google "Anderson Ark" you will see that this was a huge scam and Mr. Peck was way in over his head.

[Archon of the East]

This sounds too preposterous to be believed. My instincts tell me that there’s much more to this story if any of it is true.

I would tend to agree, lets hope this is not true. Regardless the abolishment of the IRS would be a welcome reform because we do know that this type of underhandedness does happen.

[datura]

All anyone has to do now if they face the IRS is use the Branson case - the IRS IS ILLEGAL!!!!

[elfman2]

Thanks, Also this story’s over 2 months old, and next to nothing on Google other than this Observer story that wonders all over the place before it gets to the point.

I initially missed that this is not from the “UK” Observer. Looks like the US Observer is just a blog.

[nopardons]

Thanks for the advice. :-)