Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge's actions speak louder than words (Emilio Garza)
My San Antonio ^ | 07/03/2005 | Maro Robbins

Posted on 07/07/2005 10:32:52 AM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Criminal Number 18F

"Benjamin Cardozo was a celebrated legal scholar and jurist, and his family did hail from Portugal, but he was a Sephardic Jew (and proud of it). Numerous Jewish legal scholarships, etc., bear his name, including the Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University."

Plus Benjamin Cardozo was also appointed to the Supreme Court by Republican President - Herbert Hoover.


21 posted on 07/07/2005 1:16:41 PM PDT by JackTom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: inquest

Your opinion, mine is that the SCOTUS made new law, hence my use of the term law rather than precedent.


22 posted on 07/07/2005 1:17:25 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: inquest

You are correct. He need not have voted for something he believed unconstitutional despite a prior Supreme Court ruling.

In fact, I recall reading a thread here on this forum of a Judge who did just that, and his ruling was never challenged or overturned (likely because he got it right). Wish I could remember more detail then that about the case, but apparently it has happened, at least once.

If the Supreme Court gets it wrong, it should be a Judges' duty to uphold the Constitution, not the erroneous decision.

Not bashing Garza here, but there is precedent for this sort of thing. It's called sticking your neck out for what you believe in.





23 posted on 07/07/2005 1:28:25 PM PDT by planekT (The Supreme Can of Worms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: planekT
If the Supreme Court gets it wrong, it should be a Judges' duty to uphold the Constitution, not the erroneous decision.

Nicely put. I couldn't agree more.

24 posted on 07/07/2005 1:43:28 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Thanks. I enjoy your posts and think that you are a true patriot.


25 posted on 07/07/2005 1:54:30 PM PDT by planekT (The Supreme Can of Worms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: planekT
Wow. Thanks for that.

Keep up the good fight. ;-)

26 posted on 07/07/2005 1:57:42 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Your opinion, mine is that the SCOTUS made new law, hence my use of the term law rather than precedent.

I'm going by Garza's own opinion, which is that SCOTUS's precedent conflicted with the Constitution (i.e., the law). But he upheld the precedent anyway. By his own admission, therefore, he violated his oath.

27 posted on 07/07/2005 5:05:49 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: planekT
In fact, I recall reading a thread here on this forum of a Judge who did just that, and his ruling was never challenged or overturned (likely because he got it right). Wish I could remember more detail then that about the case, but apparently it has happened, at least once.

I think I know what you're referring to, though all I remember is that it had to do with the Japanese internment during WWII. At the time, SCOTUS upheld it, but in the '80s, a lower court said it was unconstitutional, and SCOTUS never overruled that decision.

28 posted on 07/07/2005 5:08:37 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JackTom
Plus Benjamin Cardozo was also appointed to the Supreme Court by Republican President - Herbert Hoover.

Yep. Whom Cardozo had opposed for election. Cardozo was basically closer to Republicans on foreign policy and business, but he could not stand the anti-Semites who were at that time powerful in the Republican Party.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

29 posted on 07/07/2005 5:11:10 PM PDT by Criminal Number 18F (Support and avenge our fallen operators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This thread is once again relevant.
30 posted on 09/06/2005 7:46:59 AM PDT by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson