Skip to comments.
Judith Miller, TWA 800 and the Death of Press Freedom
NewsMax ^
| 7/6/05
| James D. Sanders
Posted on 07/05/2005 5:57:37 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 next last
To: SubMareener
Based on talking with several of the principals on the missile shoot-down side, and reading a lot about this, I came to the conclusion that the Xlintoon administration knew about it ahead of time, and thought they could stop it. They planned to catch the terrorists before they could launch, and get really good press for the "law enforcement" approach to fighting terrorists. Something went wrong, and they simply had to watch TWA 800 being shot down.That is the first I have heard this particular angle. Interesting. It certainly makes more sense than a coverup by the Navy that could not survive leaks.
101
posted on
07/05/2005 9:26:26 PM PDT
by
mitchbert
(Facts Are Stubborn Things .)
To: Ramius; Alberta's Child
Stats on the Stinger AAM (which are very available to terrorists):
"Light to carry and easy to operate, the FIM-92 Stinger is a passive infrared homing/seek surface-to-air missile, shoulder-fired by a single operator and designed to attack aircraft at a range of up to 15,700 feet (4,800 m) and at heights from 600 to 12,500 feet (3,800 m)."
As for the actual height of TWA800 when it was hit, didn't the gub'ment give us that info? Didn't they confiscate the tower tapes and radar records?
Lastly, all the people below the level of career bureaucrat are just evidence gatherers. The decision-makers who interpret all the evidence and make conclusions are relatively few, and are *ahem* career-oriented.
Oh, and one more thing. Terrorists don't always claim their deeds publicly, especially when they are working for, say, another head of state. In return for support, the terrorists sometimes act as a 'go-between'. They may pass a 'message' from one head of state to another privately, then back it up with a warning if the response is not acceptable. All with plausible denial.
102
posted on
07/05/2005 10:21:26 PM PDT
by
compuguru
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: kylaka
No terrorist organization ever took credit for it, which is the reason they commit these acts.... for publicity. It was most likely a government SNAFU. You make a good point. No respectable terrorist is going to bring down a 747 and let the NTSB, FBI, CIA, Navy and everyone else involved in the investigation credit a mechanical fault instead of the terrorist's action.
On the other hand, what if it was the terrorists themselves who screwed up?
I believe there's a strong case can be made that they shot down the wrong plane.
An El Al 747, also bound for Paris and then to Tel Aviv, was scheduled to take off about the same time as TWA 800 did, but was delayed because of traffic. If you were a terrorist planning to take out an airliner full of people, wouldn't an Israeli craft be a juicier target than a lowly TWA?
(Can't always trust those airline schedules anyway.)
To: Arizona Carolyn
I recall that George Will also listed TWA-800 among the terrorist attacks occurring during Clinton's reign on a TV program.
Not that George Will would be an authority on such things, but you have to wonder where he got the idea.
To: pineconeland
Consider the bombing of our Marine barracks in Lebanon.
No response
First World Trade Center bombing.
No response
Embassy bombings.
No response
USS Cole bombing
No response
It was a lot more than the downing of TWA 800 that was ignored.
105
posted on
07/06/2005 2:52:40 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
To: Peach
If Klinton ever acknowledged attacks on our country he would have had to respond and that was definitely not on his agenda.
Biting his lip and shedding false tears was more his style, unless of course, he was biting the lip of his rape victim.
106
posted on
07/06/2005 2:54:34 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
To: Arizona Carolyn
...the plane crashed on Long Island and all the NTSB personnel were new. I then found out everyone involved in the TWA 800 investigation had "retired." I did not know that either. I thought I'd read a lot about TWA 800, but I've learned several things on this thread.
107
posted on
07/06/2005 3:37:49 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: Peach
What do you thinking the odds are that abc or any of the affiliates would have a tape of that show with steffy saying the plane was shot down?
108
posted on
07/06/2005 3:43:41 AM PDT
by
rodguy911
(Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
To: rodguy911
That tape would never see the light of day, Rodguy911. I'd bet my house.
109
posted on
07/06/2005 4:11:42 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: Republic; Richard Poe; Jim Robinson; kristinn; Carl/NewsMax; Clinton Is Scum
.
Thank you for your support, Republic.
Please also see my ALOHA RONNIE posts here:
# 39
# 59
# 69
# 84
# 89
...as HILLARY is now pushing hard for Federal Regulations that would impose Media Editorial GateKeepers
on Internet news & Forums, as in ...no more Freerepublic.com, over.
I reckon it's now our turn..?
.
110
posted on
07/06/2005 5:42:35 AM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: Seadog Bytes
.
It gets worse, sb.
See ALOHA RONNIE Post #110
AR
.
111
posted on
07/06/2005 6:00:51 AM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: Ramius
"Everybody seems to just accept that the missiles available to terrorists couldn't reasonably reach the 13,000 feet of the plane. Maybe there's something wrong that *that* part of the story."
Isn't the 13,000 ft. altitude a contested statistic?
Years ago I read an article that mentioned a specific model of Swedish made SAM that could easily have done even that 13,000 ft. task. Since then I have tried searching in Jane's (www.janes.com) for more information but old stuff there requires a subscription to access.
To: OldFriend
.
http://www.RickRescorla.com
Lifesaving Hero:
1965 Battle of IA DRANG
1993 Bombing of World Trade Center
2001 Airstrikes on Word Trade Center
RICK RESCORLA - R.I.P.
.
113
posted on
07/06/2005 6:37:11 AM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: Criminal Number 18F
People like it to be a conspiracy because that ties up all the loose ends I don't. I suspect a conspiracy somewhere because of the nonsense of the official explanation.
114
posted on
07/06/2005 6:40:45 AM PDT
by
jammer
To: wagglebee
We now know the FBI and CIA knew they witnessed missile-fire, according to documents recently unearthed through the Freedom of Information Act. The truth about Flight 800 will never come out. Clinton was President then, and lied about the reason the plane went down. He'll be protected no matter if ten more flight 800s happen.One has to wonder why it is that so many people protect Clinton - Republicans as well as Democrats.
115
posted on
07/06/2005 6:46:27 AM PDT
by
swampfox98
(Michael Reagan: "It's time to stop the flood.")
To: swampfox98
FBI files. Like the STASI in East Germany.
116
posted on
07/06/2005 7:08:57 AM PDT
by
RinaseaofDs
(The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.)
To: Criminal Number 18F
Please post the assertions in the article you find to be false or misleading, otherwise your argument is purely ad hominem and lacks the weight it might otherwise deserve.
It would also be helpful for each false or misleading assertion if you could provide a more plausible explanation.
Thanks in advance,
117
posted on
07/06/2005 7:19:44 AM PDT
by
Triple
(All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
To: Alberta's Child
so was christ arrested.
did that invalidate him?
118
posted on
07/06/2005 7:26:00 AM PDT
by
ken21
(it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
To: Criminal Number 18F
done in 27 - thanks
So you agree with the center tanks explosion and the 'zoom climb' video that the CIA produced?
Do you also discount all the eye witnesses? (to a missile)
What was the residue that tested as rocket fuel, seat glue?
119
posted on
07/06/2005 7:27:44 AM PDT
by
Triple
(All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
i have no idea of where the truth lies here.
1. the links that criminal presents to caltech etc above are impressive. i read the summaries. but i'm not a chemist or physicist, nor have i the time to read all of the data.
2. if one accepts criminal's solution above, then i ask, what does he have to say about the eye witnesses, and especially those with photographs, whose accounts are at variance with the official solution?
i heard some of these eye witnesses on the radio immediately after the accident.
120
posted on
07/06/2005 7:30:53 AM PDT
by
ken21
(it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson