Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

" [...] removable gold or silver teeth caps"...?

Is this on the level? I mean, seriously...? :)

1 posted on 07/03/2005 1:59:32 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Those caps sound pretty disgusting to me too. I've never liked seeing baggy pants either. The only ones who did that when I was growing up where the "pillow people."
I have seen some conservatives be hesitant to have government intervene too much in controlling what people wear though.


2 posted on 07/03/2005 2:06:27 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

As a "fixer" of broken jewelry this freeper can say first hand "yes it is"!!

I had a customer that had a "cap", (10kt) that covered both his front top middle teeth. From him NOT taking the darn things out when he ate, he wore thru the bottom of the cap, making it loose the strength to stay on his teeth.

....I had to solder those dang things THREE DIFFERENT TIMES !!.....( and not that it makes much of a difference, but this person was white, TRYING to be "hip-hop" like "Lil' Jon".....)


3 posted on 07/03/2005 2:18:33 AM PDT by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Well, since any church is the arbiter of morals for only its membership, perhaps a better start would be prohibiting visible underwear and precious-metals dental work on its congregation.

Me, I think they'd get farther with the former than the latter. A gold tooth is far less offensive to me than airbrushed Dragon Lady fingernails bearing 76ers logos.

I mean, you can't accidentally stab me with your teeth, no matter how hard you try.


4 posted on 07/03/2005 2:23:39 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Bring it, boyeeeees, 'cause after we're done, Skynyrd will still suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I live in Jacksonville.. if this passes, Churches will burn. Thats not a threat, I'm just sure there's enough anger at the constant way the Southern Baptist Church tries to run the city that it would snap the second something so blatantly racist got passed...


You already can't wear hats in the mall because they got away with the bandanna ban, so they went for backwards hats, and then all hats...

9/10 Clubs and bars get shut down or denied a liquor liscense because of proximity to a church...

I seriously wish they WOULD push their limits on something like this and watch the political backlash bury their cause..


6 posted on 07/03/2005 2:36:02 AM PDT by kaotic133
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

When I was a teenager adults didn’t like to see DA haircuts, T-shirts (with cigarette pack rolled up in sleeve) worn as outer garb, blue jeans, or side burns, “saying they promote a thuggish image”.


7 posted on 07/03/2005 2:38:42 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Get rid of them invisible tatt
oos above all.


9 posted on 07/03/2005 2:51:17 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
A church has asked for a citywide ban on low-hanging pants and gold-capped teeth, saying they promote a thuggish image.

Where are the parents?

10 posted on 07/03/2005 3:07:33 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I like the idea of wearing you pants low and showing your underwear and the cap backwards too. It lets you know immediately who not to hire and points out the idiots quickly. Its like wearing a sign that says " Look at me , I am stupid".


12 posted on 07/03/2005 3:29:24 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Evidently! I saw a tidbit on the news last night.

http://www.news4jax.com/news/4679057/detail.html

I say just sneak up behind them and pull their pants down. Coppertone tan police...LOL



17 posted on 07/03/2005 4:03:30 AM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< OurFlorida.true.ws Impeach Judge Greer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

A Baptist church? Big surprise.


18 posted on 07/03/2005 4:26:45 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
failed to ban exposed underwear.

Maybe we can ban just certain people from wearing exposed underwear.


19 posted on 07/03/2005 4:30:44 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I don't like baggy pants or gold teeth either.

So let's ban them.

Do people really think this will make a difference in how the kids turn out? What brilliant lawmakers we have. How about banning lousy parenting instead? Or maybe banning people who refuse to blame lousy parenting and look to banning irrelevant symbols instead?


23 posted on 07/03/2005 5:09:22 AM PDT by Toskrin (Socialism is communism a little bit at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
a citywide ban on low-hanging pants and gold-capped teeth

LOL! My now deceased father would have been arrested if such a law existed here.......

26 posted on 07/03/2005 5:17:38 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Too many idiots, too little time to deal with them all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

That's a very silly proposal.


34 posted on 07/03/2005 5:43:08 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. Math 23:25


35 posted on 07/03/2005 5:52:01 AM PDT by The Lumster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

First they came for the BLING.


36 posted on 07/03/2005 5:56:17 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Yeah, there was a kid at the high school where I used to work who had caps for part of the top teeth--stretching from canine tooth to canine tooth, with the canines being very sharp. The caps were removable, appeared to be gold, and he was smugly pleased with them. I asked some other people at school about this and was told that the kid was a known 'gang banger'.

Apparently there are a variety of looks depending on which gang is involved, and it can include wearing a lot of red clothing, or blue, (imagine wearing a set of red sweat clothes in 90 degree weather), wearing caps backwards or to one side, tying shoelaces to one side--all sorts of silly looking things, depending on which gang is represented.

It got sufficiently bad that the administration banned caps, was careful about clothing colors, and even suspended, or so I heard, pep rallies due to concerns about gangs. It appears to be a growing problem.

37 posted on 07/03/2005 5:57:14 AM PDT by Marty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

"A church has asked for a citywide ban on low-hanging pants and gold-capped teeth"

Kent-doggie: Read our lips. Repeat after me: That ain't news. You ain't a reporter. Stop typing,turn off the computer, and go outside and play.


39 posted on 07/03/2005 6:25:13 AM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

The only thing offensive to me is the government trying to tell people how they can wear their teeth and clothes. Anyone who doesn't see this as gross violation of idividual rights in not a conservative, or a libertarian for that matter. If you don't like the way someone looks, look the other way and leave them alone.


44 posted on 07/03/2005 6:56:14 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

How about this for a novel solution. The city can confiscate the offending 'property' for a public benefit.


47 posted on 07/03/2005 9:10:40 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson