Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Treasonous agenda of the Trilateral Commission
World Net Daily ^ | 06.24.05 | Devvy Kidd

Posted on 07/02/2005 5:28:30 PM PDT by Coleus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
To: Torie

21 posted on 07/02/2005 6:10:09 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

What are the three sides of the trilateral commission?


22 posted on 07/02/2005 6:11:51 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

23 posted on 07/02/2005 6:17:35 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

See, there really is an answer:

Western Europe, North America (USA and Canada), and Japan


24 posted on 07/02/2005 6:17:36 PM PDT by Coleus (God doesn't like moderates, Rev 3:15-16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Japan aka Japan Inc., North America aka Rockefellers/Kissinger/Neocons and Europe aka Rothschilds. Connect the dots.
25 posted on 07/02/2005 6:18:33 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I've been getting the vibe from WND more and more lately. Worse, I'm starting to believe that WND is intentionally playing fast and loose with the truth.


26 posted on 07/02/2005 6:19:06 PM PDT by Melas (Lives in state of disbelief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

What are the three sides of the trilateral commission?

The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North America (United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these core democratic industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system. Originally established for three years, our work has been renewed for successive triennia (three-year periods), most recently for a triennium to be completed in 2006.

When the first triennium of the Trilateral Commission was launched in 1973, the most immediate purpose was to draw together—at a time of considerable friction among governments—the highest level unofficial group possible to look together at the key common problems facing our three areas. At a deeper level, there was a sense that the United States was no longer in such a singular leadership position as it had been in earlier post-World War II years, and that a more shared form of leadership—including Europe and Japan in particular—would be needed for the international system to navigate successfully the major challenges of the coming years.

Two strong convictions guide our thinking for the 2004-2006 triennium. First, the Trilateral Commission remains as important as ever in helping our countries fulfill their shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system and, second, its framework needs to be widened to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group, and Mexican members have been added to the North American Group. The European Group continues to widen in line with the enlargement of the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium our practice of inviting a number of participants from other key areas.

The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s is deepening into “globalization.” The need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) remain the primary anchors of the wider international system, has not diminished but, if anything, intensified. At the same time, their leadership must change to take into account the dramatic transformation of the international system. As relations with other countries become more mature—and power more diffuse—the leadership tasks of the original Trilateral countries need to be carried out with others to an increasing extent.

The members of the Trilateral Commission are about 350 distinguished leaders in business, media, academia, public service (excluding current national Cabinet Ministers), labor unions, and other non-governmental organizations from the three regions. The regional Chairmen, Deputy Chairmen, and Directors constitute the leadership of the Trilateral Commission, along with an Executive Committee including about 40 other members.

The annual meeting of Trilateral Commission members rotates among the three regions. It was held in Washington in 2005, Warsaw in 2004, and Seoul in 2003. The 2006 plenary will be held in Tokyo. The agendas for these meetings have addressed a wide range of issues, an indication of how broadly we see the partnership among our countries. Presentations from these meetings have been published in the Commission's (Trialogue) series and/or posted under Recent Activity on this web site.

The project work of the Trilateral Commission generally involves teams of authors from our three regions working together for a year or so on draft reports which are discussed in draft form in the annual meeting and then published. The authors typically consult with many others in the course of their work. The task force reports (Triangle Papers) to the Trilateral Commission have covered a wide range of topics.

The regional groups within the Trilateral Commission carry on some activities of their own. The European Group, with its secretariat based in Paris, has an annual weekend meeting each fall. The North American Group, with its secretariat based in Washington D.C. began North American regional meetings in 2002 and occasionally gathers with a special speaker for a dinner or luncheon event. The new Pacific Asian Group, with its secretariat based in Tokyo, began regional meetings in 2000. Each region carries on its own fund-raising to provide the financial support needed for the Trilateral Commission’s work.


27 posted on 07/02/2005 6:19:50 PM PDT by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Have you ever visited cfr.org? They are very open about their intentions.


28 posted on 07/02/2005 6:21:00 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: antisocial

I have actually attended some of the CFR meetings. Truth be told, I am the man behind the curtain.


29 posted on 07/02/2005 6:24:06 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Don't take this stuff to lightly.


30 posted on 07/02/2005 6:24:40 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: beaver fever

Triennia, Triangle papers. A pattern is emerging. Something geometric.


31 posted on 07/02/2005 6:32:30 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

They definitely have a fetish for the number three.

Reminds me of War of the Worlds; three eyes, three fingers, three legs......makes ya think.

But seriously they were the Avante Garde cavalry for Globalization and still are the....Puppet Masters.

(Removing Tin Foil Hat Now)


32 posted on 07/02/2005 6:38:19 PM PDT by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

This attack on the Trilateral Commission is idiotic.


33 posted on 07/02/2005 6:38:53 PM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Global free trade will force the poor of the rich countries to subsidize the rich in poor countries. What GATT means is that our national wealth, accumulated over centuries, will be transferred from a developed country like Britain to developing countries like Communist China, now building its first oceangoing navy in 500 years.

Mr. Goldsmith (and the author) must have missed Adam Smith's classic work, The Wealth of the Nations. It made some really good arguments against merchantilism.

34 posted on 07/02/2005 6:39:39 PM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar

merchantilism=mercantilism.


35 posted on 07/02/2005 6:41:01 PM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Torie

36 posted on 07/02/2005 6:44:42 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

It would be notable to collect up all the data on the Trilaterists, the One Worlders, the IMFers, World Bankers, Multinationalists, put it all into a current perspective and determine what direction our global economy and politics are really headed. Are there any collaborators out there for such a project?


37 posted on 07/02/2005 6:48:19 PM PDT by carpetblogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

The trilateralists ruined my lawn! Its true, they had a secret meeting with those slobs, the Bilderbergers and the Knights of Templar. The bastards did donuts on my lawn, and peed all over my flowerbed.

It had to be them, because it was dark, and I couldn't make out their faces, but I know a conspiracy when I see one, there was a black helicopter too! It was black, because it was dark.

Devvy Kidd is a nut, another silly tax protester.


38 posted on 07/02/2005 6:49:31 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Intelligent design is neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaver fever

This global stuff started long ago. It probably started in the good old USA like everything else of modern times. The global civil society has done a few things of some use such as international copyright recognition, but mostly it is incoherent and accomplishes less than a box of squirrels. It is a venue for meeting equivalents from other places and sharing concerns and vague apprehensions. Does Bono instruct the TLC how to perpetuate class distinctions?


39 posted on 07/02/2005 6:50:02 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Wow, I'm impressed!


40 posted on 07/02/2005 6:50:16 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson