Skip to comments.
IBM Wins $850M Settlement From Microsoft
First Coast News ^
| 7/1/05
| AP
Posted on 07/01/2005 10:04:24 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
It's really a bite sometimes to find an AP story on a site which can be posted here.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It warms the cockles of my heart to know that all these awards against Microshaft for business misbehaviors are continued to be paid by me and millions of other software purchasers and legitimate software users.
2
posted on
07/01/2005 10:22:49 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: Publius6961
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
4
posted on
07/01/2005 10:28:06 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Publius6961
It warms the cockles of my heart to know that all these awards against Microshaft for business misbehaviors are continued to be paid by me and millions of other software purchasers and legitimate software users. Something you might want to consider the next time you put together a PO with Microsoft's name on it. Your choice, my friend.
5
posted on
07/01/2005 10:32:21 AM PDT
by
kezekiel
We're entering what I think is the final stage of this process.Maybe this round, but this is the Microsoft way of competing.
6
posted on
07/01/2005 10:36:46 AM PDT
by
D-fendr
To: Publius6961
It warms the cockles of my heart to know that all these awards against Microshaft for business misbehaviors are continued to be paid by me and millions of other software purchasers and legitimate software users. Well, since MS makes most of its money selling software the only money it can use to pay these debts to others they have stuck it to is the money they make selling software. What do you think they should do, print their own? Maybe they can start a side business doing something else and use that money to pay for their criminal acts, would that be better?
7
posted on
07/01/2005 10:50:09 AM PDT
by
calex59
To: ShadowAce
Good. Everyone who's violated anyone's rights or property in the IT industry needs to pay up. The sooner the better.
To: D-fendr
Maybe this round, but this is the Microsoft way of competing. Which is exactly what I don't like about them. Why can't Microsoft complete on the merits of their products and prices rather than strong-arm tactics. No, Microsoft isn't technically a monopoly but those are exactly the sorts of tactics that make a monopoly a bad thing for consumers.
To: All
no mention of the monopoly declaration?
I wonder if the government will try and take the settlement money because it is "punishment" and would serve society to have the government control the distribution of monies for punishment. (/sarcasm off)
To: Question_Assumptions
Is that the fault of Microsoft or the fault of the user?
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Is that the fault of Microsoft or the fault of the user? Is what the fault of Microsoft or the user?
To: Question_Assumptions
Which is exactly what I don't like about them. Why can't Microsoft complete on the merits of their products and prices rather than strong-arm tactics. No, Microsoft isn't technically a monopoly but those are exactly the sorts of tactics that make a monopoly a bad thing for consumers.
You do realize that this settlement covers behavior from a decade ago, right?
13
posted on
07/01/2005 11:48:04 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: Golden Eagle
Good. Everyone who's violated anyone's rights or property in the IT industry needs to pay up. The sooner the better. Are you trying to edge SCO's wholly unproven claims into this discussion?
To: calex59
I wonder how much gross sales IBM would need to generate 850mill in profit.
15
posted on
07/01/2005 11:58:17 AM PDT
by
txhurl
To: Bush2000
You do realize that this settlement covers behavior from a decade ago, right? Of course. And? In some regards, the damage has already been done. In other regards, I'm not entirely conviced that Microsoft still doesn't have an anticompetative attitude. Please note that I do think that Microsoft could compete in several areas based on quality and price but they won't. For example, I have no doubt that MS Office for Linux would sell just as well as the Mac version of Office does, if not better.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
And the irony of this story is that IBM turned around and sold its PC hardware business to the Chinese ...
17
posted on
07/01/2005 12:17:47 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: Question_Assumptions
Of course. And?
Your comments would lead the average reader to conclude that you think this behavior is ongoing:
"Why can't Microsoft complete on the merits of their products and prices rather than strong-arm tactics."
So, I ask you: What strong-arm tactics is Microsoft currently using?
18
posted on
07/01/2005 12:20:15 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: Question_Assumptions
Please note that I do think that Microsoft could compete in several areas based on quality and price but they won't. For example, I have no doubt that MS Office for Linux would sell just as well as the Mac version of Office does, if not better.
Uhhhhhhhh ... there is no market for MS Office for Linux. Dog, chase tail.
19
posted on
07/01/2005 12:21:04 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: antiRepublicrat
Are you saying IBM should get a free pass if they illegally used Unix code in Linux? Should anybody, if they did?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson