Skip to comments.
He grabbed girl's arm -- now he's a sex offender
Chicago Sun Times ^
| 7-1-2005
| Steve Patterson
Posted on 07/01/2005 7:45:06 AM PDT by Cagey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
1
posted on
07/01/2005 7:45:06 AM PDT
by
Cagey
To: Cagey
2
posted on
07/01/2005 7:46:56 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
To: Cagey
It's that pesky thought police thing happening again....
3
posted on
07/01/2005 7:47:17 AM PDT
by
rockrr
(Gregorovych Nyet!)
To: Cagey
4
posted on
07/01/2005 7:47:33 AM PDT
by
SouthernBoyupNorth
("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
To: Cagey
So if he just punched her in the face it would have been assault or sexual assault?
5
posted on
07/01/2005 7:48:23 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: frogjerk
What do you expect from Illinois?
6
posted on
07/01/2005 7:48:40 AM PDT
by
MarkeyD
(I really, really loathe liberals.)
To: Cagey
"But Cook County state's attorney spokesman Tom Stanton said Barnaby should have to register "because of the proclivity of offenders who restrain children to also commit sex acts or other crimes against them." BS!
7
posted on
07/01/2005 7:50:27 AM PDT
by
patriot_wes
(papal infallibility - a proud tradition since 1869)
To: Cagey
And this is why I'm against putting every one of them in the online database. It should be a case by case basis only.
Any senior in high school in a relationship with a sophomore is a sex offender in most states. Which means, I would guess, a sizable number of all of you are probably sex offenders. The laws have good intentions, but are poor in reality.
8
posted on
07/01/2005 7:50:36 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: Cagey
WHAT! If your going to charge him charge him with assualt. "illegal touching without permission" something like that
9
posted on
07/01/2005 7:51:27 AM PDT
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: Cagey
I was probably wearing a blue shirt. Many sex offenders own blue shirts, and often wear them before committing a crime. Since I am wearing a blue shirt today, I guess I need to register, too.
/stupid
10
posted on
07/01/2005 7:52:53 AM PDT
by
jtminton
(Help stop second hand rap!)
To: Cagey
11
posted on
07/01/2005 7:53:21 AM PDT
by
TheForceOfOne
(My tagline snapped the last time the MSM blew smoke up my ass. Now its gone forever.)
To: jtminton
I was probably wearing = HE was probably wearing
12
posted on
07/01/2005 7:53:41 AM PDT
by
jtminton
(Help stop second hand rap!)
To: Cagey
13
posted on
07/01/2005 7:55:36 AM PDT
by
pax_et_bonum
(Three guys walked into a bar. The fourth one ducked.)
To: mysterio
Which means, I would guess, a sizable number of all of you are probably sex offenders.That's a pretty wide brush your painting with there. Don't assume your behavior on everybody else...
14
posted on
07/01/2005 7:55:53 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
To: Cagey
Not surprising, a lot of the sex offender thing is a witch hunt.
15
posted on
07/01/2005 7:56:28 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(If you don't get the bible, how can you be a Christian?)
To: TheForceOfOne
Zero tolerance gone mad.Exactly. Zero tolerance without common sense is a road to hell...
16
posted on
07/01/2005 7:57:03 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
To: Cagey
You have got to be Sh*ting me!...
17
posted on
07/01/2005 7:58:02 AM PDT
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Cagey
18
posted on
07/01/2005 7:58:18 AM PDT
by
SeeRushToldU_So
(If you jog in a jogging suit, lounge in lounging pajamas,WHY would anyone want to wear a windbreaker)
To: frogjerk
I could see if the court had a bug up their butt to charge him with misdemeanor assault, but NOT for this!
19
posted on
07/01/2005 7:59:36 AM PDT
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: Cagey
It is rulings like this that will ultimately water down the protections that should be gained from the "sexual offenders" designation. I would think all those "I can't read his mind" and "proclivity to maybe" statements would be the basis for further appeals. Otherwise, males are all open to the would be rapist charge of the feminazi crowd. Should we all register? I'll bet they'd say yes!
I doubt he'd get a fair shake from SCOTUS. After all, so designating him as an offender is for "the common good" and who gives a damn about his individual rights. Not that court. The only hope he would have is if they wanted to demonstrate a move to the right to buck up the libs for their filibuster.
Hey, dude, next time just hit her with the car.
20
posted on
07/01/2005 7:59:48 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Same stuff, different democRAT [this tagline rated PG-13])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson