Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Isn't Sandy Berger Going to Jail?
National Ledger ^ | June 30, 2005 | Tom Fitton

Posted on 06/30/2005 9:53:59 PM PDT by yoe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
Read the whole article then contact your congressmen and senators about this - it is unconscionable to let this man only pay a fine...demand he receive jail time and demand to know just what is being covered up. Is Bill Clinton getting away with his dereliction of duty again? It would seem so.
1 posted on 06/30/2005 9:53:59 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe

Becuz Bill Clinton is buddy buddy with GBush1 and like a son to Barbara Bush.

wouldn't want to sully the Office of POTUS now, would we?


2 posted on 06/30/2005 9:56:17 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Q:Why Isn't Sandy Berger Going to Jail?

A: He's a Democrat.

3 posted on 06/30/2005 9:56:35 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

....uh, because he's one of the Special People?


4 posted on 06/30/2005 9:57:22 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
The answer is in the article: Clinton.

No one connected with that administration can do any wrong.

5 posted on 06/30/2005 9:57:29 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (The Democrats have the right mascot; everyone knows what comes out of an ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yoe

"Is Bill Clinton getting away with his dereliction of duty again?"

Duh!


6 posted on 06/30/2005 9:57:42 PM PDT by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and Our Armed Forces!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Why Isn't Sandy Berger Going to Jail?

Because Hillary still has all of those files. If Berger was really in danger of going to jail, he would be dead already.

7 posted on 06/30/2005 10:00:05 PM PDT by streetpreacher (If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Why?

Because the Bush Administration and the "Justice" Department don't give a damn what politically-connected higher-ups do. They let Sh$%head and Mrs. Sh#%head skate completely, and will do the same for all their underlings.

It's the Big Government types scratching each other's back. Simple.

The Bushes and the Sh#%heads are very buddy-buddy; that's all there is to it.

8 posted on 06/30/2005 10:00:26 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
"Q:Why Isn't Sandy Berger Going to Jail?"

Q: Why isn't the media all over this.

A: It's a Democrat breaking the law.

9 posted on 06/30/2005 10:00:45 PM PDT by malia (President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yoe

This is the first I heard of ol' Fat Sandy Burglar pleadin' guilty...
The press sure buried this story.

And we still don't know what he ripped off, why and for whom...

Now for that, I would give him a lighter sentence but without a complete confession, I'd have to see what he looked like in an orange jumpsuit.

Semper Fi,
Kelly


10 posted on 06/30/2005 10:01:22 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malia

yup.


11 posted on 06/30/2005 10:01:27 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
The Bushes and the Sh#%heads are very buddy-buddy; that's all there is to it.

BTTT

12 posted on 06/30/2005 10:02:30 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yoe

He's too fat to fit in a cell?


13 posted on 06/30/2005 10:02:37 PM PDT by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
What galls me is the temporary removal of his security clearance......!
14 posted on 06/30/2005 10:03:39 PM PDT by Jay Howard Smith (Retired(25yrs)Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Duah!!!! He's a Liberal Democrat who has been on his knees to the First Felon, don't ya' know...


15 posted on 06/30/2005 10:04:56 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuzzy122

If we could morph Bush's testicular fortitude and Clinton's ability to get away with fecal matter, we would have the perfect president


16 posted on 06/30/2005 10:09:01 PM PDT by When do we get liberated?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Because as long as your a RAT you can stuff highly classified documents in your socks ,and down your pants and walk out the door every day of the week!.........If a Republican ever dared do that, they'd not only be tarred and feathered by the MSM, they would get 35 years to life in San Quinton.You can take that to the bank!
17 posted on 06/30/2005 10:18:49 PM PDT by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I saw where J Watch filed a request for the DC Bar to investigate Berger's case for possible sanction.

But why did the DC Bar NOT initiate its own probe/review?

And this guy's getting his security clearance suspended only temporarily ?

This is the same great American who was a registered foreign agent for Communist China when Clinton hired him.

The comparative case in the article reminds me of the Clinton Impeachment, where the female M.D., J.D., federal employee was sent to prison for doing the same thing (on the job sex) Clinton did.


18 posted on 06/30/2005 10:19:14 PM PDT by CharlieChan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

The following was on Rep Tom Davis' (RINO-VA) website almost a year ago. He has yet to call the promised hearings.
_________________________________

reform.house.gov

Government Reform
Contact: David Marin (202) 225-5074


Davis to Investigate Berger Allegations



Washington, Jul 21 -


House Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis (R-VA) announced today that the Committee intends to investigate allegations that former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger, in preparation for 9-11 Commission hearings, took highly sensitive terrorism documents from a secure reading room at the National Archives.

The Government Reform Committee, which has jurisdiction over the National Archives, is the primary investigative committee in the House of Representatives.

“These allegations are deeply troubling, and it’s our constitutional responsibility to find out what happened and why,” Davis said. “It boggles the mind to imagine how a former national security advisor walked off with this kind of material in his pants, or wherever on his body he carried it. At best, we’re looking at tremendously irresponsible handling of highly classified information – some of which, I understand, has not yet been located.

“At worst, his actions suggest an intentional effort to keep critical information away from the Commission and the American public. We are now left wondering whether the Commission, set to release its report tomorrow, had access to all of the information it needed to fully do its job. The American people’s faith in our review of 9-11, in our war on terror, in our transparency, is literally at stake in this investigation. It is my hope that Mr. Berger cooperates fully with the Justice Department as its investigation proceeds. Meanwhile, as we continue to afford him the presumption of innocence he deserves, we will fulfill our duty to the American people to get to the bottom of this disturbing breach of trust and protocol.”



19 posted on 06/30/2005 10:19:59 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

read later bump


20 posted on 06/30/2005 10:20:24 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson