Skip to comments.
The Bush Speech Snippets that will Sink the Dems (and that no one is talking about)
The White House ^
| 6/28/2005
| George W. Bush
Posted on 06/29/2005 5:43:50 PM PDT by EarlyBird
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
My ears perked up when I heard these snippets during the live speech last night. These are masterful phrases guaranteed to stir American patriotism that were interspersed into Bush's Ft. Bragg speech.
That these snippets come on the heels of Rowe's ridicule of the Democrat response to 9/11 is not accidental.
The numerous references to 9/11 not only further served to stoke resolve in America, they also purposely blinded the Democrats of the potency of the these speech snippets.
The Democrats are so outraged over the 9/11 references that they are completely missing how Bush just dealt them body blow after body blow with these stealthily placed phrases.
1
posted on
06/29/2005 5:43:51 PM PDT
by
EarlyBird
To: EarlyBird; FairOpinion
Thanks to FairOpinion who posted the complete transcript of the speech.
2
posted on
06/29/2005 5:44:45 PM PDT
by
EarlyBird
To: EarlyBird
I am convinced that, had the Democrats supported the Global War on Terror, President George W. Bush would have let them live on as a political party. However, they have been acting like Traitors, so they will have to be destroyed as a political force in this country. The same goes for their running dogs, (yes I know it is a ChiCom phrase, but that is called irony), in the main stream media.
3
posted on
06/29/2005 5:54:10 PM PDT
by
SubMareener
(Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
To: EarlyBird
4
posted on
06/29/2005 5:55:33 PM PDT
by
perfect stranger
("Hell Bent for Election" by Warburg)
To: EarlyBird
To: SubMareener
I am convinced that, had the Democrats supported the Global War on Terror, President George W. Bush would have let them live on as a political party. However, they have been acting like Traitors, so they will have to be destroyed as a political force in this country. The same goes for their running dogs, (yes I know it is a ChiCom phrase, but that is called irony), in the main stream media. I think you are right. The Rove speech signaled that the gloves have now (finally) come off. I look for more of this to come.
6
posted on
06/29/2005 5:57:13 PM PDT
by
EarlyBird
To: SubMareener
Running dogs, I like it, but should I drop the "bathhouse boys" title that I give to the MSM?
To: Wayback Machine
Ooh! Ooh! I got one:
"I truly am not that concerned about him (bin Laden)" ---War President, 3/13/02
TROLL
To: EarlyBird
The MSM is going apoplectic [as are their Democrat comrades] about the President's 5 references to 911. The substance of his speech MEANS nothing to them. They ignore everything he said trying to invoke a backlash against the President by pounding on his "INSENSITIVITY".
Further PROOF that ROVE was correct about LIBERALS.
10
posted on
06/29/2005 6:01:01 PM PDT
by
PISANO
(We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
To: EarlyBird
The political Left is going to go on living in its pacifist fantasyland, no matter what anyone says. The time has come to ignore these people, and get on with serious business.
To: Wayback Machine
When you have something constructive to say, I might pay attention to you.
To: Wayback Machine
ZOT!
You, my trolling friend, are not long for this thread.
13
posted on
06/29/2005 6:04:29 PM PDT
by
Chuck54
(Someone please ping me when Barak Obama utters an original thought.)
To: Chuck54
It's already been banned, zotted/whatever.
To: Wayback Machine
I bet you still have a JF'nK bumper sticker on your car. I pity you and your pathetic journey through life.
15
posted on
06/29/2005 6:06:39 PM PDT
by
tarzantheapeman
(Democrats - How can we stab America in the back today?)
To: Common Tator
There are two questions I ask after every presidential speech. Whose support was the president trying to garner, and what did he say to try to persuade them. Bush is IMO successfully garnering disaffected Democrats. The Democrat leadership has positioned themselves so far out of the American mainstream, that Bush only has to sound like any other patriotic president to make them look like veritable traitors. He doesn't even have to mention the name of their party. Everyone knows who he's talking about.
The traditional Democrat rank and file won't be able to remain loyal to their party much longer.
To: PilloryHillary
Thanks. My very first time in ahead of the zot. Life is good. :)
17
posted on
06/29/2005 6:08:01 PM PDT
by
Chuck54
(Someone please ping me when Barak Obama utters an original thought.)
To: PilloryHillary
That's 2 in the past 2 hours... They recently banned a General Bragg too.
18
posted on
06/29/2005 6:09:31 PM PDT
by
RedBeaconNY
(Peace is not absence of war.)
To: EarlyBird

The liberal insurgents Will be defeated !
19
posted on
06/29/2005 6:10:35 PM PDT
by
John Lenin
(Liberalism: Where defeat is victory)
To: EarlyBird
The President needs to speak to the people more often. When he is silent and leaves the field to the other guys, support across the country waivers according to the polls.
It doesn't always have to be great, or be an event, he just needs to be George W. Bush. The MSM can't spin that away.
20
posted on
06/29/2005 6:10:58 PM PDT
by
Bernard
(It seems the only guilty people in this country are the soldiers who guard terrorists at Gitmo.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson