Skip to comments.
Harris camp feels 'a stab in the back'
The Hill ^
| June 29, 2005
| Bob Cusack
Posted on 06/29/2005 4:58:34 PM PDT by RWR8189
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
With poll numbers like the ones I've seen recently, Harris looks like a weak candidate.
1
posted on
06/29/2005 4:58:37 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
To: RWR8189
No good deed goes unpunished.
Governing by polls and interfering with primaries reminds me of the Bill Clinton adminstration.
2
posted on
06/29/2005 5:01:44 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
To: dubyaismypresident
Sending the strongest candidate to meet the challenger sounds like good politics to me.
3
posted on
06/29/2005 5:03:28 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
(I Will Sit on My Hands in 2008 Instead of Voting for McCain)(No Money for the NRSC)
To: RWR8189
This is not coming from the Harris campaign officials or the candidate herself. Her "backers" (the only individuals the article mentions) should shut up - their commentary makes her look weak, unsupported, etc. They are doing her no favors.
To: RWR8189
Sending the strongest candidate to meet the challenger sounds like good politics to me.They can't get jack done with 55 should we assume they could with 58?
The voters for Toomey, Salier, Cain, Fletcher, et al. are not ammused.
At least in 08 there won't be Senatorial primary treachery
5
posted on
06/29/2005 5:05:52 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
To: dubyaismypresident
Making it to 60 is not out of the question.
6
posted on
06/29/2005 5:07:39 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
(I Will Sit on My Hands in 2008 Instead of Voting for McCain)(No Money for the NRSC)
To: RWR8189
It's unimaginable that the White House folks and the National Republican Senatorial Committee would be so disloyal to Katherine Harris, especially after all she has done for the Bush family and the Republican Party," I'd be careful loosely tossing around comments like this. We wouldn't want people to think that Harris abused her position as Secretary Of State in order to give Bush the win, instead of simply following the law.
-PJ
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: RWR8189
The Rules apply...

9
posted on
06/29/2005 5:09:58 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: RWR8189
There is nothing like a good primary to get a good candidate.
10
posted on
06/29/2005 5:10:01 PM PDT
by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: RWR8189
Making it to 60 is not out of the question.So, 60 would include Chaffee and Snowe and McCain. So it really would be 60 conservative votes at all. Maybe the administration should think about finding finding a real replacement for Nelson in Nebraska instead of chosing sides in Florida.
Judging from your tagline, I don't really think we are that far apart.
11
posted on
06/29/2005 5:10:35 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
To: RWR8189
That's not what I saw. State wide poll in Florida last week had Harris leading ALL Republicans no matter who was listed and only 6 points behind Nelson.
12
posted on
06/29/2005 5:10:45 PM PDT
by
skimbell
To: Dont Question
Post of the day! Good job.
13
posted on
06/29/2005 5:11:03 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
To: RWR8189
No good deed goes unpunished.
No F-up goes unrewarded.
14
posted on
06/29/2005 5:13:23 PM PDT
by
iconoclast
(Conservative, not partisan..)
To: My2Cents
Is that you with Katherine...hubba hubba
15
posted on
06/29/2005 5:13:29 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
To: skimbell
16
posted on
06/29/2005 5:16:50 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
(I Will Sit on My Hands in 2008 Instead of Voting for McCain)(No Money for the NRSC)
To: RWR8189
Katherine
is a strong candidate.
I supported her for the House and I will support her Senate run.
I like her.
17
posted on
06/29/2005 5:22:03 PM PDT
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: dubyaismypresident
60 votes means being able to invoke cloture on things like tax reform and social security.
It means the marginilization of the Democrats even more.
And 2006 is probably is the last push to 60 for a long time.
In 2008 we have to defend many more seats, and we may be in a country going through "Bush fatigue"
18
posted on
06/29/2005 5:22:43 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
(I Will Sit on My Hands in 2008 Instead of Voting for McCain)(No Money for the NRSC)
To: RWR8189
60 votes means being able to invoke cloture on things like tax reform and social security. Ha! Snowe and Chafee are already against personal accounts.
As for 2006 send a few bucks to Mark Kennedy in Minnesota and tell Liddy Dole to get on the stick and find us a candidate in Nebraska.
19
posted on
06/29/2005 5:25:28 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
To: RWR8189
"Bush fatigue"? Only when I'm dead.
20
posted on
06/29/2005 5:29:13 PM PDT
by
listenhillary
(FR is infiltrated with defeatists, socialists, pessimists, and fools all with intent to destroy us)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson