Skip to comments.
Judge Overturns Rape Conviction Because Jurors Found Alleged Confession Note in Pants~~UNREAL!!
Tampa Bay online ^
| Jun 29, 2005
| The Associated Press
Posted on 06/29/2005 12:39:43 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Oh good, a rapist running free.
2
posted on
06/29/2005 12:41:44 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
His own confession sets him free! Only in America!
3
posted on
06/29/2005 12:41:44 PM PDT
by
Knute
(W- Still the President!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
His own confession sets him free! Only in America!
4
posted on
06/29/2005 12:42:14 PM PDT
by
Knute
(W- Still the President!)
To: Knute
5
posted on
06/29/2005 12:43:19 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Since the document had not been entered into evidence during trial, its discovery during deliberations tainted the jury, I sure hope they enter it into evidence for a second trial. I think if I were his lawyer, I'd get him to plea bargain.
6
posted on
06/29/2005 12:43:49 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm curious if the confession will be entered into evidence in the new trial.
7
posted on
06/29/2005 12:43:52 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Absurd! Maybe Circuit Judge Diane Goodstein ought to find herself in a dark alley with the rapist.
8
posted on
06/29/2005 12:44:20 PM PDT
by
SeaBiscuit
(God Bless all who defend America and the rest can go to hell.)
To: Knute
How do they know the jury was "tainted." Doesn't the rest of the evidence convict him. Retry the case.
9
posted on
06/29/2005 12:44:24 PM PDT
by
nikos1121
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I actually agree with this decision IF the note influenced the jury. There has to be an opportunity for the defense to evaluate any evidence. What if he didn't write it? It wouldn't be unheard of for someone to plant incriminating evidence.
Damned If I Know
10
posted on
06/29/2005 12:44:46 PM PDT
by
sharktrager
(My life is like a box of chocolates, but someone took all the good ones.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Circuit Judge Diane Goodstein"--clintoonian idiot?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It was the correct decision. The prosecution should have entered that note into evidence. They're the ones who screwed up, not the court. The jury rendered a verdict based on evidence the defense never had a chance to exclude in court. So the judge made the right call in setting aside the defendant's conviction.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
12
posted on
06/29/2005 12:45:12 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I am so glad I am not a criminal defense lawyer who would have to try to make such an argument.
13
posted on
06/29/2005 12:45:12 PM PDT
by
Fierce Allegiance
(Happy 12th birthday to my little Queen Nosilla!)
To: Knute
Yep..and btw, the sky is falling. Genius.
14
posted on
06/29/2005 12:45:56 PM PDT
by
Windsong
(FighterPilot)
To: goldstategop
Technically correct, definitely wrong.
15
posted on
06/29/2005 12:46:10 PM PDT
by
Fierce Allegiance
(Happy 12th birthday to my little Queen Nosilla!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm curious what evidentiary value the pants were SUPPOSED to have.
16
posted on
06/29/2005 12:48:16 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is inexcusably outrageous. On so many levels. Beginning with the police who obviously didn't search the guy's pant pockets.
17
posted on
06/29/2005 12:48:51 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: Dog Gone
I've no idea, I just post this stuff.....LOL!
To: AppyPappy
I don't believe he's free. He's in jail, pending re-trial, where he will certainly be convicted when the note is properly put into evidence.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
As much as I hate to see this rapist go free, this is the right decision on the judge's part. That note could have been written by anyone and stuffed in the pants. There is no way to know if it was a real confession or not. I would not want to be on trial and have someone "find" a confession while in the jury room and hang me for it. This is no different than "finding" a bunch of ballots as happened in washington state.
20
posted on
06/29/2005 12:51:26 PM PDT
by
calex59
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson