Posted on 06/26/2005 10:07:04 AM PDT by Josh in PA
In effect , as one of 100 Senators who are a part of our govt., she does run our country. I did not get out of his comments an endorsement to be Pres.
To prevent duplicates, please do not alter the heading. Thanks.
I agree. He would have said the same thing about
Laura if the BushES had been on the platform with him.
I prefer it was the Clintons. With their moraltrack
record, they need all the sympathy pull they can get.
Hillary and Bill know that they will have to appeal to the "religious right" for Hillary to win in 2008.
That was what this fiasco with Graham was all about. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out the Clintons. You just have to be smart enough not to let yourself get sucked into their trap.
dittos.
Billy Graham IS suffering from Alzheimer disease. He takes the Clintons at face value, and we all have seen how charming they can be if you take them at face value.
I really hate that his son, handlers, etc. have allowed the Clintons to use Graham and his final crusade to push Hillary's Pres. run forward. Doubtless, it will sell to some people.
vaudine
There is a difference between private reconcilliation and public endorsement...Billy has been around enough to know the difference.
Because of what these two, Bill and Hillary, support...Graham should have never offered such a public endorsement. He knows better.
He may be more forgiving because of his advanced age...but these two can still cause trouble and for the future he should be quietly forgiving but publicly taking them to task for what they represent...regardless of how "nice" they are.
Many white collar criminals and schisters are the nicest people you ever met. Billy is old enough to know this too.
Quip. ....as in wisecrack, joke, jest.
........ just like the church burnings that he said he remembered as a kid. (not)
;-)
They both have something on common -
none are ashamed of taking other peoples money for their own use..
"his wife to run the country."
Run it into a communist h*ll!
see post # 29 .........
;-)
The problem with making such a jest...is it will be spun until it no longer is a just a jest and becomes an endorsement, because that's exactly what the liberal media wants.
They do it all the time, negatively, in regard to conservative speakers.
The press are masters at avoiding context and manipulating context when it works to their advantage and serves their interests.
I doubt it.. Graham is an admitted Socialist(Democrat) and fighter of the "Social Injustice" caused by free enterprise.
He would vote for Hillary.
Both of these old coots can just bite me.
That was my first thought as well.
During the Clinton years and after it came out Clinton was getting regular Lewinsky's in the oval office - Billy Graham also said it wasn't Billy's fault as a virily, attractive, yound man that all those nasty, vile, sister's of Eve and Jezebal's threw themselves at him.
Okay, Billy Graham didn't call them Jezebal's or sisters of Eve - but he did blame Cinton's female problems on the victims for throwing themselves at him. Billy G.'s message pretty much seems to boil down to 'if you're rich, powerful and attractive' you can pretty much do what you want and still enter the Kingdom.' It is a shame that he sucked all those people in with such a message. We can ALL be saved, but not if we blame our sins and failings on someone else.
SORRY virily = virile; yound = young - I apologize for the misspellings.
The "religious right" will never be sucked into the Clinton's trap. Some "Religious" people might.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.