Posted on 06/25/2005 6:33:07 AM PDT by Pokey78
I was already very clear on where you stood by what you said.
Well .. since your conversation has desolved into name calling .. our conversation is over.
I have confidence in about 1/3 of the voters of the country to do the right thing; I understand that about 1/3 are hard-core America haters who would love nothing more than see a Communist government, wit no private property rights, and no free speech. (this is the Democrat base). I have lost confidence in the other 1/3, those who are the soft middle and who are basically squishes, might go one way, might go the other. So, basically whenever there is an election, the Demonrats will have a chance as you just cannot trust the middle 1/3 to do the right thing. They are why the Demonrats are even around anymore. The Dims should have died a quiet unlamented death as a political party many years ago.
When you call me a typical arrogant elitist liberal (and by extension "dim" and "an idiot") you think that's fine but when I return the favor by calling you a self-righteous hypocrite you depart in a huff because I've descended into name-calling.
I wish I could say this was typical of conservative behavior...but it isn't. It's typical of the self-righteous and the unconscious.
bttt
Yeah, it's so easy to confuse a Clinton c***s***er (Wesley Clark, Lib!) with a real general.
For libs like you who don't even know the first name of your softie "war hero", maybe there is no difference.
You are laughable.
As far as I can tell the difference between a real general and a "softie" - in your mind - is his politics.
For libs like you who don't even know the first name of your softie "war hero", maybe there is no difference.
I didn't remember his name because he's not my hero and has never been important to me. You can't see that because you can't think.
By the way, hypocrite, if you have such trust in the average man why is it that people of your political persuasion are so adamant about making sure this is a republic rather than a democracy? Why so much emphasis on checks and balances? The founders were also clear about the need to restrain populist passions and lusts.
from Rumsfeld: Insurgency Could Last for Years
Another c**ks****r, liberal, "softie"? You know that thing on top of your neck is actually good for something. You ought to at least try using it.
You lack of coherent thought and your complete inability to grasp what is being "argued" about is unworthy of any further response, liberal.
Don't address me again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.