Treasonous agenda of the Council on Foreign Relations

– Aurthur Schlesinger Jr., July / August '95 Foreign Affairs, CFR's flagship publication

Lou Dobb's show on June 9, 2005, was an eye popper and even Lou couldn't contain his shock:

Lou Dobbs, CNN Anchor: Good evening, everybody. Tonight, an astonishing proposal to expand our borders to incorporate Mexico and Canada and simultaneously further diminish U.S. sovereignty. Have our political elites gone mad? We'll have a special report. Blood ... Now, incredibly, a panel sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations wants the United States to focus not on the defense of our own borders, but rather create what effectively would be a common border that includes Mexico and Canada."

Christine Romans, CNN Correspondent (voice-over): On Capitol Hill, testimony calling for Americans to start thinking like citizens of North America and treat the U.S., Mexico and Canada like one big country.

For constitutionalists like myself, this is treason talk and Lou Dobbs should be thanked by the American people for exposing this evil plan. The fact that it is even being discussed in the U.S. Congress is putrid. The Council on Foreign Relations is an organization whose mission is to redefine American policy and slide this republic into a one-world government – a nightmare beyond what most Americans can't even imagine. Rear Adm. Chester Ward was a member of the CFR for 16 years and later warned the American people as to the true intentions of this treasonous operation:

The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common – they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world-banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government.

The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education and mass communication media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation's right to know machinery – the news media – usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities.

The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high-level decisions for converting the United States from a sovereign constitutional republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship.

Who are some of the past and present members of this anti-American operation? Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, Porter Goss, Alan Greenspan, John Bolton, Paul Wolfowitz, Gen. Richard B. Myers, Henry Hyde, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, George Bush Sr., Sandra Day O'Connor, George Soros, Christopher Dodd, Diane Feinstein, Gerald Ford, Bill Frist, Newt Gingrich, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Katherine Harris, Teresa Heinz, Antonia Hernandez – President of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Gen. John P. Jumper – current Air Force chief of staff, Joseph Lieberman, John McCain, Rupert Murdock, David Rockefeller, Diane Sawyer and Tony Snow.

Popular "conservative" radio talk-show hosts attack anyone who dares to suggest the provable agenda of organizations like the CFR or United Nations. Better to attack the messenger than the message. Most popular mouthpieces on radio or television today have never spent one minute doing the research I have over the past 15 years. Perhaps Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., who specialized in this field was nothing more than a kook when he warned, "The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system and make the U.S. an official part of it." Before any American decides to poo-poo the CFR and their diabolical agenda, they might wish to read some of the writings by Barry Goldwater on this issue.

Our beloved republic is being wrested away from we the people by sitting presidents and Congresses since 1913. It is being done right out in the open, and yet, the American people don't seem to be taking their freedom or liberty seriously because they continue to vote back the same scoundrels, crooks, communists, socialists and sellouts into office. America is under attack by forces who wish to destroy this republic, our way of life, our independence, our lives, liberty and freedoms.

Before you can fight an enemy, you must know who your enemy is and the game-plan. If you play the game, the game will play you. I encourage every American to do the hard research and in November 2006 – clean out Congress, our state legislatures and any other elected office where the current incumbent is violating their oath of office and betraying our republic.

The thing that astonishes me, when one examines the events over the last 100 years, how is that with the brightest minds of the whole world in every conceivable postiion of power and authority, and at all levels of society - Harvard, Yale, Carnegie, Rhodes, Oxford, Princeton, etc. - result in the entire world stumbling from one social crises, catastrophe to another? The laws of chance alone suggest that things would be gotten right at least once. But instead, what I see instead is the travesty of an ongoing train-wreck over the last 100 years. How could things be gotten that wrong and so often? Unless its not an accident.

The legal definition of conspiracy is: two or more persons acting in concert to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action even so the conspirators are not aware of the conspiracy, nor others engaged with the same objective in mind. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design, even so the conspirators are not aware of the existance of such, leaders and organizers, or each other, nor even its goals. In the United States courts of law, a charge of conspiracy is extremely onerus one. Heaven help you if you aren't aware that you're part of one. A fundamental premis in this regard is that ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it. By extension this applies to conspiracies also.

So the question remains, is there a conspiracy to implement pan-global government? I present the analogy of a disassembled firearm, the pieces of which are on a table. A blindfolded person examines the pieces and has to say what's on the table. I postulate that any reasonable person could state there are sufficient pieces on the table to assemble a gun. There's a book that's long out of print. Its called None Dare Call it Treason. The by-line is: because if profit is the reason, then noe dare call it treason.

In that book the author, Gary Allen, writes on page 12:

I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies....but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

Xclintoon's most lasting academic impression [as an undergraduate at Georgetown University] seems to have been a required freshman course, Development of Civilization, a survey of European history taught by Carroll Quigley, one of Georgetown's more colorful professors, who was known to conclude his lectures on classical political theory by flamboyantly tossing Plato's Republic or some other masterpiece out the second-story classroom window.

Quigley knowingly explained the connections between money, technology, class, and political power... A consultant to the space program, the Pentagon, and the Smithsonian... he extolled the way both the Democrats and the Republicans, while maintaining a democratic illusion for popular consumption, were fundamentally subservient to powerful special interests.

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies... is a foolish idea. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. The policies that are vital and necessary for America are no longer subjects of significant disagreement, but are disputable only in detail, procedure, priority, or method."

That sentiment was echoed by Zbigniew Brzenski, in a 1974 Foreign Affairs issue, intimating that an end run around national sovereignty was essential and to be accomplished through identical means, "whereby if the people ever decided to vote the rascals out, there'd be no difference to the rascals they voted in".

A fellow student of Bill Clinton, Harold Snider, said Clinton found Quigley "fascinating, electrifying, and brilliant."

Carrol Quigley, wrote a seminal book on the goals, objectives and methods of the Council of Foreign Relations Tragedy and Hope (A history of the World in Our Time).

In it, the same quote by Gary Allen can be found on page 950. However, two telling sentances are missing from the above quote: "This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so." The above network must remain a secret in order for the quote to have any value toward proving that there is a conspiracy. Once the secretive network is revealed, the above quote loses much of its appeal as a proof text for the existence of a conspiracy. Even more telling is the previous paragraph:

The radical Right version of these events as written up by John T. Flynn, Freda Utley, and others, was even more remote from the truth than were Budenz’s or Bentley’s versions, although it had a tremendous impact on American opinion and American relations with other countries in the years 1947-1955. This radical Right fairy tale, which is now an accepted folk myth in many groups in America, pictured the recent history of the United States, in regard to domestic reform and in foreign affairs, as a well-organized plot by extreme Left-wing elements, operating from the White House itself and controlling all the chief avenues of publicity in the United States, to destroy the American way of life, based on private enterprise, laissez faire, and isolationism, in behalf of alien ideologies of Russian Socialism and British cosmopolitanism (or internationalism). This plot, if we are to believe the myth, worked through such avenues of publicity as The New York Times and the Harold Tribune, the Christian Science Monitor and the Washington Post, the Atlantic Monthly and Harper’s Magazine and had at its core the wild-eyed and bushy-haired theoreticians of Socialist Harvard and the London School of Economics. It was determined to bring the United States into World War II on the side of England (Roosevelt's first love) and Soviet Russia (his second love) in order to destroy every finer element of American life and, as part of this consciously planned scheme, invited Japan to attack Pearl Harbor, and destroyed Chiang Kai-shek, all the while undermining America’s real strength by excessive spending and unbalanced budgets.

Carroll Quigley would later destroy the plates to Tragedy and Hope. When Quigley found out that he could not keep the radical right (VRWC) from deliberately distorting this and many other citations in Tragedy and Hope, he decided that the only way to prevent the conspiracy theorists from distorting his work was to deny them their ammunition. In so doing, his plan backfired. The radical Right, as he called them, claims to this day that the book was suppressed by the New World Order.

[ No outrage...Even on Free Republic...It was just a few years ago, right here on FR that many members decried the notion that the CFR even exhisted.. ]

True.. but thats because of the Alex Jones's and like that..
The perfect cover for compiracy is a whole bunch them that are mostly Moonbat ravings..

This has been played with a master hand.. By whom.?. Well god knows there are a bunch of "them" to "'blame".. To think this being carried out by idiots flys in the face of pure genius.. Very well done...

All to nought with a revolution though.. That is the ONLY thing that they stay up at night about.. The U.S. gov't, the Msm and MsP, Hollywood, and maybe even CABLE are involved.. in all this.. Nothing this intricate happens willy nilly..

The INTERNET.?.. Well the internet is mainly just a bunch of b!itching.. as we do here.. Notice the Dan Rather expose' solved nothing.. cBS has Moonbats coming out their ears.. there is no lack of moonbats.. Nothing was solved.. cBS was even allowed to INVESTIGATE themselves by the FCC which is headed by Colin Powells son.. The FCC having a budget of more than 300 million dollars.. WHY?.. What do they Do?..

The whole thing smacks of compiracy.. even multi-convoluted compiracys.. Been following this for years here.. many compiracys are silly some are not.. How would a "sheep" know..

It comes to stop though when the sheeple STAMPEDE....
A lot of wolves will get trampled, sheep too, sheep dogs too, but its the only way the flock will survive.. How will you know whos a sheep.?. Who's in the stampede.. even then some stampeders are just running..

By the way, it was just too convient for me that John F'ing Kerry ran against George Bush of all the democrat contenders.. George might have lost otherwise..

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"