Posted on 06/20/2005 10:35:27 AM PDT by TFFKAMM
I never heard that in Sunday School or in Jesuit high school.
However, if he literally meant "at least in their practice in some places", I guess anything is possible.
At least in their practice, a certain small Protestant group seemed to be raising Tammy Faye Baker to "co-redemtrix" whenever I channel-surfed past their cable TV station several years ago.
You have just identified a problem I'm having. I visit occasionally with my offspring and the repetitive music and hand clapping drives me up the wall. The "Minister of Music" thinks he's leading a Broadway musical or something. But AT LEAST the minister preaches against sin and points the parisioners toward Christ.
At my home church, the organ is powerful, we actually use a Hymnal and sing Hymns that I grew up on, but the preacher is so mealy-mouth it's pitiful.
I really wish I had the answer. I want the old Southern Baptist church I grew up in without all this "its-everybody's-fault-so-it's-nobody's-fault" feel-goodism. Our preacher is trying to get us out of the SBC and into the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship. In case you don't know what that is, one of its "leaders" is James Earl Carter hisself.
The old Southern Baptist way was for the believer to get into the true, God-written Word - and that provides plenty of intellectual challenge for anybody.
Thanks for the ping.
"Why, in today's churches, is the rigor of their theology inversely proportional to their musical talent and complexity?"
Why, indeed. We moved out-of-state recently and are having an awful time trying to find a church because of that very reason.
You should also try The Antiphonal Music of Giovanni Gabrieli (the absolute best album for brass ensemble EVER, bar none).
Good stuff.
Thanks!
good one ping
That stuff isn't 'hymnody'.
It's simpering drivel.
And Dan Schutte is a poofter.
I think Lewis was an Anglican
Ya... I got the point.
I should have also tried to answer your orginial question. Catholicism addresses spiritual and material matters seriously. Most other denominations seem to underemphasize one or the other. The Anglicans (and Epsicopalians) once fell into this category also but contemporary fashion seems to have knocked the spiritual out of them.
There's an Anglican subculture referred to as the "Anglo-Catholic" tendency, where they outdo pre-Vatican II Roman Catholicism in ritualism and eucharistic adoration. I've attended an Anglo-Catholic parish in San Francisco which is a wild combination of more-Catholic-than-the-Pope mystical liturgy, and highly unconventional parishioners (flaming gays and homeless people sitting next to stereotypical Episcopalian WASP oldsters...)
In my initial post, the noun used was "ooze."
I used 'hymnody' to clarify for our confused brother...but the term "ooze", I think, is more apropos.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.