Posted on 06/16/2005 6:53:51 AM PDT by rhema
Oftentimes the hospital is an interested party in this. IIRC, in the Karen Ann Quinlan case, her mother (she was unmarried) and the hospital both went to court for an order to allow her respirator to be removed, as neither wanted to be guilty of murder.
As far as the "one flesh" - that may be Biblically correct but in the secular world you are two separate entities.
So if I go into a PVS and my wife decides to pull the tube I've been murdered by her?
Get off it already. You're just upset because people now know you *aren't* a conservative.
BROKEN COVENANT = NO RIGHTS.
It looks like someone knows they are on the losing side of the debate and changes the subject rather than answer the question :)
Perhaps you should move to a Muslim country where husbands are more than free to do whatever they please with their property, I mean, their wives, no questions asked.
Exactly.
I go into a PVS. My wife tries therapy but I don't respond. She pulls the tube, which is what I've told her I want. Years later she meets someone new and starts a new family.
Except that the government didn't let her pull the tube. I don't want my wife to be trapped in limbo forever.
The only ones losing the debate are the ones arguing in favor of state-sanctioned murder.
See tagline.
Try and answer the question this time: If I go into a PVS and my wife pulls the tube, according to my wishes, was I murdered?
Please do a search on misdiagnosis PVS and be careful of wording of any documents to be sure what you want is what you are actually asking for. A diagnosis of PVS is really only an opinion of the particular Dr who may have his own agenda. Diagnosing PVS is not like a Dr saying you have a broken arm or tests show you are diabetic. It is a very subjective diagnosis.
The issues around the Terri situation are so much more complicated than just the issue of husband/wife or even PVS. Like any other issue that attracts a lot of attention there are some who are "out there" who were involved on both sides.
Ideally these choices should remain with the family; the problem arises when the family can not work it out. I have told my husband if I am ever in the same condition Terri was to please keep away anyone with an agenda of death, get me the best possible care and do whatever he feels is right under the circumstances-including removal of life support. but under NO condition is he to ever allow me to dehydrate to death.
What a lot of people missed was the fear this brought out in disabled people, that a probate judge could make a decision to end their life...until I found out about Terri I did NOT realize that type of decision could be made by others without the patient having a signed legal document saying that was their wish. I had a big problem with the verbal, she said she didn't want to live like this...I had a lot of other issues but that one is front and center with me.
I will have to disagree when you say Republicans were on the wrong side of this issue- which Republicans? Judge Greer is a Republican as is Senator King and many others who fought against saving Terri. Some Republicans fought to save her but so did some Democrats.
We will have to disagree on this, but that's ok- I do think the Politicians and officials who tried to stop this were right to do so and I hope they would do the same for me.
You must be Catholic because I believe that faith in Jesus Christ is what gets you into Heaven.
You seem to feel that a marriage contract gives you the right, even, the obligation to kill your spouse if she is not in 100% perfect operating order.
I never said that and I never implied it. If my wife were to tell me that she'd want to stay alive not matter how damaged or destroyed her brain or body is then I would use all my power to fight for that.
What I am saying is that the marriage contract should determine where the authority in making the decision comes from. Not from the government, not from a judge, and not even from the family.
Your wife is free to pull your plug and then marry someone else because she did not break the covenant. She is allowed to marry after you die.
She is not free to pull your plug after she has committed adultery while you are still alive because she has broken the covenant by committing adultery.
If you can't understand that simple reasoning...please ask your wife to pull the plug NOW.
I am Catholic and as for the rest of your argument, What's the point in repating my answer? NO! A marriage vow does not give you the right to murder your spouse.
Suppose my family and the government and a bunch of internet activists stopped my wife from pulling the plug? Her choices then become to either not move on with her life (unnaccetable to me) until a decades-long legal battle is resolved, or to "break" the marriage covenant. I'd want her to take the second option.
So if I were in a PVS, my wife shouldn't be allowed to remove the tube? Even though earlier in the thread you had conceded that she could if I had a living will?
Alright, just you. You're allowed to murder your wife anytime you want for whatever reason. And just cause it's you no one will say it wrong. OK?
Barb, you said in post #62 of this thread that people should be allowed to make living wills. Suppose in the exact case above my wife and I had a living will. Then she wouldn't be murdering me if I were in a PVS?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.