Skip to comments.
DNA of Voles May Hint at Why Some Fathers Shirk Duties
NY Times ^
| June 10, 2005
| NICHOLAS WADE
Posted on 06/10/2005 4:18:16 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
http://www.sciencemag.org/ The vole story isn't available unless you subscribe.

Larry J. Young/Yerkes National Primate Research Center
Prairie voles on gels of their DNA, a possible clue to their home life.
1
posted on
06/10/2005 4:18:16 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
2
posted on
06/10/2005 4:20:40 PM PDT
by
m87339
(Squawk: "Plane is rough on Autoland" Response: "Autoland not installed on this equipment")
To: longtermmemmory; shaggy eel; Fiddlstix; Alia
...another animal-based proposal for eugenics from feminazis and the NY Times.
3
posted on
06/10/2005 4:23:00 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: neverdem
"Voles, not to be confused with the burrowing, hill-making mole..."
I'm guessing that only a NYT reader would make that mistake.
4
posted on
06/10/2005 4:23:45 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: neverdem
Oh, sure. It's all
GENETICS and we don't have any control over our actions.
More junk science from the Slimes.
5
posted on
06/10/2005 4:27:11 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
6
posted on
06/10/2005 4:27:11 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
So should women seek men with the longest possible DNA ...Should I say it?
7
posted on
06/10/2005 4:28:21 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Leftists would have no standards at all)
To: neverdem
This article says a whole lot of nothing.
Choices are not genetic. Yet another attempt to explain away bad behavior because of genetics.
8
posted on
06/10/2005 4:28:54 PM PDT
by
Conservatrix
("He who stands for nothing will fall for anything.")
To: neverdem
9
posted on
06/10/2005 4:31:30 PM PDT
by
aomagrat
(Where weapons are not allowed, it is best to carry weapons.)
To: Texas Eagle
10
posted on
06/10/2005 4:35:54 PM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: familyop
lol. Remember during the 70s, the big pick up line was: What's your sign? (astrologic). It's possible the new pick-up sign of the 2000s is being geared towards: What's your gene read-out say... Show me your genes, and I'll show you mine... (heavy breathing)
Let's see if our "genes" are compatible.
Oh sorry, can't date you, I'm a level 18, and you're a level.. 11. Bye!
"Although our genetic composites make out well in re compatibility -- Venus conjunct Jupiter. I mean. Gene 3 conjunct your Gene 13 means our child will never be socially adept; no children for us. Let's take a pledge of compatibility!
Scientology dating sounds so boring to me.
11
posted on
06/10/2005 4:44:28 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: neverdem
So should women seek men with the longest possible DNA control regionJa Vole...(excuse my German)
12
posted on
06/10/2005 4:53:03 PM PDT
by
sourcery
("Compelling State Interest" is the refuge of judicial activist traitors against the Constitution)
To: aomagrat
20th Century Vole Pictures
presents
A Man with 2 Buttocks
13
posted on
06/10/2005 4:53:46 PM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
To: neverdem
14
posted on
06/10/2005 4:54:50 PM PDT
by
ken21
(if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
To: familyop
seems like a publish or perish BS article. Produce a PC hypothesis and then pray for the power of PC to yield funding when in competition with feminist (garbage) studies departments.
To: neverdem
Kill anything that is related to a mole, sounds like mole or looks like mole. The little bastards are a menace.
16
posted on
06/10/2005 5:23:23 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: neverdem
I fail to see the connection between what a rodent does and what a human does.
I can just imagine the uproar if someone wrote an article posing the comparison of women and some bird that is constantly squawking.
17
posted on
06/10/2005 5:32:17 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(FACT: You can get more reliable information in a beauty shop, than from the media)
To: neverdem
Evolutionary Psychology junkscience alert.
To: microgood
Evolutionary Psychology junkscience alert. I disagree. This could prove to be quite vole-atile. The literature will be vole-uminous, and will impact our theories of human vole-ition.
Is there an e-vole-ution ping list?
To: neverdem
20
posted on
06/10/2005 7:45:03 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Deep Throat(s) -- top level FBI officials playing cub reporters for fools.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson