Posted on 06/06/2005 8:42:41 AM PDT by Che Chihuahua
Are you on hallucinogens? Where did I say that?
You are an example of a totalitarian statist mascarading as a republican.
"But the JBT's do get to confiscate a lot of money and stuff without due process and they get to keep it all."
Civil asset forfeiture alone is an excellent reason to oppose this purported "war on drugs." All you folks in favor of this kind of unconstitutional property seizure without due process should take a drive out I-10 in a high-dollar vehicle with FL or NY tags, and see what happens, particularly in Louisiana.
I wouldn't stand by that, either. You're not weighing all the costs and benefits of the WOD if you think it "costs" more to keep drugs illegal. In terms of money alone you've got to factor in all the expenditures of drug enforcement at the state, local and federal level. You've got to factor in the costs of building and maintaining prisons. You've also got to factor intangible costs such as the lost production for those who are incarcerated. The costs to legalize are far smaller than the costs to maintain the war on drugs.
I didn't say you said it. It was a question. Obviously if I were a drug user, I would want them legalized.
ROTFL! Are you saying that Bush is a totalitarian statist? Was Reagan?
So, are you saying that you are a child molester? Just a question. Are you? That's what you are saying?
"That's what you are saying?"
Some people just want to register their disapproval of certain activities in any way possible, regardless of the consequences. It's a sort of simplistic mindset, that says "I'm agin' it, and if you ain't, I'm agin' you too."
Boston Tea Party? That was a different America. There will never be another revolution in this country. Three genrations have fallen for the shiznits. The masses are unknowingly part of it.
Marijuana is not a narcotic.
Nicotine could be classified as such, however, as some of the alkaloids bind weakly to Mu reptors in the brain (the pre-requisite for a drug to be classified pharmacologically as a "narcotic").
Marijuana is not a narcotic.
Nicotine could be classified as such, however, as some of the alkaloids bind weakly to Mu reptors in the brain (the pre-requisite for a drug to be classified pharmacologically as a "narcotic").
Alcohol is aruably the 'hardest' drug known to man. It does more physical damage to the body, and produces more profound intoxication and uncoordination than most other drugs.
There is no such thing as a "hard" drug. The hardness or softness of a drug depends on the user.
My pot smoking collegues can easily wait to get home to adminster their drug, while my tobacco smoking collegues start obsessing and craving well before lunch.
Alcohol is aruably the 'hardest' drug known to man. It does more physical damage to the body, and produces more profound intoxication and uncoordination than most other drugs.
There is no such thing as a "hard" drug. The hardness or softness of a drug depends on the user.
My pot smoking collegues can easily wait to get home to adminster their drug, while my tobacco smoking collegues start obsessing and craving well before lunch.
Alcohol is aruably the 'hardest' drug known to man. It does more physical damage to the body, and produces more profound intoxication and uncoordination than most other drugs.
There is no such thing as a "hard" drug. The hardness or softness of a drug depends on the user.
My pot smoking collegues can easily wait to get home to adminster their drug, while my tobacco smoking collegues start obsessing and craving well before lunch.
Alcohol is aruably the 'hardest' drug known to man. It does more physical damage to the body, and produces more profound intoxication and uncoordination than most other drugs.
There is no such thing as a "hard" drug. The hardness or softness of a drug depends on the user.
My pot smoking collegues can easily wait to get home to adminster their drug, while my tobacco smoking collegues start obsessing and craving well before lunch.
Alcohol is aruably the 'hardest' drug known to man. It does more physical damage to the body, and produces more profound intoxication and uncoordination than most other drugs.
There is no such thing as a "hard" drug. The hardness or softness of a drug depends on the user.
My pot smoking collegues can easily wait to get home to adminster their drug, while my tobacco smoking collegues start obsessing and craving well before lunch.
Alcohol is aruably the 'hardest' drug known to man. It does more physical damage to the body, and produces more profound intoxication and uncoordination than most other drugs.
There is no such thing as a "hard" drug. The hardness or softness of a drug depends on the user.
My pot smoking collegues can easily wait to get home to adminster their drug, while my tobacco smoking collegues start obsessing and craving well before lunch.
Alcohol is aruably the 'hardest' drug known to man. It does more physical damage to the body, and produces more profound intoxication and uncoordination than most other drugs.
There is no such thing as a "hard" drug. The hardness or softness of a drug depends on the user.
My pot smoking collegues can easily wait to get home to adminster their drug, while my tobacco smoking collegues start obsessing and craving well before lunch.
Alcohol is aruably the 'hardest' drug known to man. It does more physical damage to the body, and produces more profound intoxication and uncoordination than most other drugs.
There is no such thing as a "hard" drug. The hardness or softness of a drug depends on the user.
My pot smoking collegues can easily wait to get home to adminster their drug, while my tobacco smoking collegues start obsessing and craving well before lunch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.