Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court: Government can bar medical marijuana use
Reuters / Yahoo ^ | 6/6/05

Posted on 06/06/2005 8:18:49 AM PDT by Xbvalk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Really hate to think your suspicion is correct, but Scalia's reasoning on this dissent was decidedly below par. I am a big fan, Scalia has written dissents that will be cited for a generation to come, but this ain't one of them.


41 posted on 06/06/2005 4:25:50 PM PDT by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting
Amendment XVIII(18) was considered necessary to "prohibit the manufacture, sale or transportation of intoxicating liquors."

Very good point. I don't agree with Prohibition, but I will give them credit for going about it the correct way.

I'm waiting to hear that "saving money" is a violation of Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce. Not spending my money has one tremendous effect on both intrastate and interstate commerce.

Also, the fact that a banking corporation, likely interstate, uses it for loans and other things (which is how they get the money to pay you interest) has a significant effect on interstate commerce.

42 posted on 06/07/2005 6:44:06 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson