Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Cities Urged to Adopt 'Congestion Tax'
The Washington Post ^ | Sunday, June 5, 2005; Page A15 | Terence Chea

Posted on 06/05/2005 2:36:22 PM PDT by echoBoomer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Paleo Conservative

"I think the Brithish are considering implementing a more intrusive and controversial toll system in all cars containing a GPS receiver to record distance time of day and location of all travel."

Details on the UK driving tax:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1416734/posts


21 posted on 06/05/2005 3:48:30 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me
Hell, for nine bucks I'd put a burning barrel of used motor oil in the back of my truck and show them what pollution really looks like!

LOL!


22 posted on 06/05/2005 3:48:55 PM PDT by Major_Risktaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Major_Risktaker

LOL....git-er-done!


23 posted on 06/05/2005 3:51:11 PM PDT by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Congestion is a problem of poor traffic management by the civic engineers.

Traffic engineers are either incompetent or sadistic. I'm not sure which. Maybe a mixture of both.

24 posted on 06/05/2005 4:22:21 PM PDT by umgud (FR, NASCAR, NRA, GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Traffic engineers are neither incompetent nor sadistic; the incompetent, sadistic politicians hamstring any reasonable efforts.


25 posted on 06/05/2005 4:37:22 PM PDT by dufekin (United States of America: a judicial tyranny, not a federal republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Uhhuh35
I remember job-shadowing a traffic engineer (many years ago). I asked him about several issues. His plan to reduce traffic congestion? Build better, wider, more numerous bridges. But city councilmen from neighborhoods without inadequate bridges would oppose it. Others would call the plan "racist" for their own provincial, almost incomprehensible reasons (especially because the engineer was a minority). The unionists would demand ridiculous wages and plentiful fund-consuming delays. The enviro-wackos would pout (and sue) about the bridges causing pollution (as if congestion wasn't polluting). The NIMBYs would raise ludicrous "preservationist" claims. The historic lobby would call the old, rotting bridges "historic." The mosquito-preservationists would demand habitat for the biting mosquito, which they call "endangered."

With all that opposition (and there's certain to be more), a new bridge costs a quarter-century legal battle (with a very real chance of losing at every turn) that a mere traffic engineer dare not provoke. Traffic engineers, therefore, seek out minor, hopefully invisible and non-controversial projects that make minor improvements or simple maintenance.
27 posted on 06/05/2005 5:10:21 PM PDT by dufekin (United States of America: a judicial tyranny, not a federal republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: weegee; Xenalyte

When I lived in Houston, I wouldn't drive on the loops at all unless it was at least a couple of hours before or after rush hour. On the other hand, the access roads were wonderful highway substitutes. I preferred waiting at the occasional red lights on the parallel access roads to parking on the inner or outer loop.

Thank goodness now Houston has mass transit. /sarc


28 posted on 06/05/2005 5:52:04 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (<-- sick of faux-conservatives who want federal government intervention for 'conservative things.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: The Grammar Police
That still doesn't mean that it's a bad idea.

Yeah it is a bad idea.

I prefer the solution of accommodating business to move from these congested areas, leaving behind the tax consumers. Result, the quick relief of congestion and the long term unintended consequences appear at the same time. Instant ghetto and urban decay.

31 posted on 06/05/2005 6:41:28 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The Grammar Police

You are a kook.


32 posted on 06/05/2005 6:42:14 PM PDT by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

I agree. As far as the cities are concerned, let them tax themselves out of existance. Giant ghettos is what will become of them.


33 posted on 06/05/2005 6:46:07 PM PDT by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: weegee
...traffic lights in this town are often 180 degrees out of phase. Go from one light to the next and wait.

I have noticed that in a lot of places across the Fruited Plain... There is an agenda behind it too... I am glad I moved to Southern Oregon...

San Franfreako won't be far behind London I read somewhere. Problem is, I think their over inflated real estate market is about to be hit by a major collapse.

Rail system? Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) is plagued by scandal, budget overruns, and crime. I don't live in Houston, but I'll bet you will see a lot of the same in the coming years...

34 posted on 06/05/2005 6:47:22 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer

Why a tax? stop immigation, and congestion disappears.


35 posted on 06/05/2005 6:51:23 PM PDT by SandyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingofQue
As far as the cities are concerned, let them tax themselves out of existence.

The unavoidable result of taxing the producers and payers, and paying the non producers.

The truth is that you can only tax producers, as they are the only ones that can pay. The secret to success is to not give away the revenue to the non producers, but to use it wisely and conservatively to build and maintain the infrastructure that all the producers use as a foundation to their production. This also encourages the non producers to go to work (or starve) as there is infrastructure to support a producing job for them.

Roads and bridges are one of the most ancient forms of economic infrastructure, and the lower the toll (or use cost) the larger the overall economic benefit.

36 posted on 06/05/2005 7:06:07 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
"We are the only city in the Western world where there's a notable shift from car use to public transport...

... consequently providing the city with the revenues from public transportation fares.

"We're going to get the money one way or the other," states the Communist Mayor of London.

37 posted on 06/05/2005 8:54:11 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Grammar Police

The problem with your simplistic analyses is that we are paying through the nose for politicians to represent us.
They should have been anticipating these psoblems years ago and spending highway money addordingly.
The fact that they have been using highway money for countless other social problems to make them look good and get reelected is, I believe, the heart of the matter.
They have recieved far more money needed to take care of their constitutients.
Now they want to charge more because they failed so far.
What we need is to clean house and elect people that will respect their oath of office.
Just about everything we do is taxed and they still want more.


38 posted on 06/05/2005 9:04:51 PM PDT by chuckwalla (the insanity, the lunacy these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
Liberals want to ban cars by taxing us out of them. When it comes to new ways of inconveniencing all of us, they give a whole new meaning to the expression, "deloverly."

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
39 posted on 06/06/2005 4:05:30 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"Congestion?" While we're on the subject, let's ban couples from having more than one child. Liberals will make China's draconian policy only a tad less severe by taxing every other child extra. In a few decades, no more congestion. Doubtless they'll find creative ways to make up for the lost revenue due to fewer people being around.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
40 posted on 06/06/2005 4:08:20 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson